IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences
{"title":"In Memoriam Tatjana Turanskyj, 1967–2021","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/fgs.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article uses a case study approach to analyze current German practice with respect to women’s film heritage. A sketch of the contemporary German film-archival landscape is followed by a brief survey of women’s film in the curatorial program of the Deutsche Kinemathek, focusing specifically on the 2019 Berlinale Retrospective Selbstbestimmt: Perspektiven von Filmemacherinnen (Self-determined: Perspectives from women filmmakers). National film heritage practice is compared with approaches across feminist institutions and projects, including festivals, feminist and queer archives, and one-off events; approaches from both contexts are then situated in relation to the place of films by women in federal digitization policy and practice. Analysis of two short films returns the focus to the notion of a self-determined film history underpinning the 2019 retrospective; tensions are explored between the feminist teleology that term implies and a curatorial practice of intersectional gender performance that is evident in many of the feminist initiatives discussed.","PeriodicalId":53717,"journal":{"name":"Feminist German Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 117 - 118 - 140 - 141 - 159 - 160 - 181 - 182 - 201 - 26 - 27 - 53 - 54 - 72 - 73 - 97 - 98 - ix"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist German Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fgs.2022.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文采用个案研究的方法,分析了当前德国女性电影遗产的实践。在对当代德国电影档案景观进行概述之后,在德国电影资料馆的策展项目中对女性电影进行了简要调查,特别关注2019年柏林电影节回顾展:Perspektiven von Filmemacherinnen(自我决定:女性电影人的视角)。国家电影遗产实践与女权主义机构和项目的方法进行了比较,包括电影节,女权主义者和酷儿档案,以及一次性事件;然后,这两种背景下的方法都与女性电影在联邦数字化政策和实践中的地位有关。对两部短片的分析将焦点带回2019年回顾展的自我决定的电影史概念;该术语所暗示的女权主义目的论与在讨论的许多女权主义倡议中显而易见的交叉性别表现的策展实践之间的紧张关系进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Memoriam Tatjana Turanskyj, 1967–2021
Abstract:This article uses a case study approach to analyze current German practice with respect to women’s film heritage. A sketch of the contemporary German film-archival landscape is followed by a brief survey of women’s film in the curatorial program of the Deutsche Kinemathek, focusing specifically on the 2019 Berlinale Retrospective Selbstbestimmt: Perspektiven von Filmemacherinnen (Self-determined: Perspectives from women filmmakers). National film heritage practice is compared with approaches across feminist institutions and projects, including festivals, feminist and queer archives, and one-off events; approaches from both contexts are then situated in relation to the place of films by women in federal digitization policy and practice. Analysis of two short films returns the focus to the notion of a self-determined film history underpinning the 2019 retrospective; tensions are explored between the feminist teleology that term implies and a curatorial practice of intersectional gender performance that is evident in many of the feminist initiatives discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist German Studies
Feminist German Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信