《财富》500强公司的品牌激励社交媒体活动的有效性

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS
M. Razi, J. M. Tarn, A. Mumuni
{"title":"《财富》500强公司的品牌激励社交媒体活动的有效性","authors":"M. Razi, J. M. Tarn, A. Mumuni","doi":"10.1108/AJB-07-2017-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to determine how best to build online advocates for a food company’s brand based on data available from the brand’s Facebook pages. Specific research objectives are to study examine whether incentivizing actions such as “liking,” sharing or commenting on a brand’s Facebook impacts the brand community’s sentiment and engagement with the brand, and whether such engagement is different for different actions (e.g. liking vs sharing).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo achieve the objectives of this research, sentiment analysis is performed on Facebook insight data from a Fortune 500 company, consisting of fans’ comments, shares and “likes” for promotional and fan posts pertaining to one of its brands. Paired samples t-tests are performed to assess differences in sentiment and engagement before and after each promotional post.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results do not support a strong impact of promotional posts on overall sentiment. However, there is evidence in support of a positive impact of the campaigns on overall wall-level engagement with the brand. Moreover, the levels of engagement are not the same for all promotional posts. Rather, some posts resulted in much higher engagement levels than others, suggesting that not all incentivized campaigns are created equal.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study used the data from only one of company’s many brands. Therefore, similar studies on other brands are warranted.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSocial networking sites are increasing in numbers, and more and more businesses are embracing social networks and/or blogs as part of their marketing platforms. Many companies offer coupons and incentives on social media to entice customers to engage with their social media platforms as well as buy products. The study results provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of different kinds of social media promotional campaigns, and can help managers decide which campaigns to implement to achieve specific objectives.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research adds to the literature in two ways. First, it contributes to the limited literature on the effectiveness of incentivized social media campaign. Second, it contributes to the social media analytics literature by demonstrating how sentiment analysis can be used along with other statistical procedures to make sense of qualitative social media data.\n","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of incentivized social media campaigns for a Fortune 500 company’s brand\",\"authors\":\"M. Razi, J. M. Tarn, A. Mumuni\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AJB-07-2017-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to determine how best to build online advocates for a food company’s brand based on data available from the brand’s Facebook pages. Specific research objectives are to study examine whether incentivizing actions such as “liking,” sharing or commenting on a brand’s Facebook impacts the brand community’s sentiment and engagement with the brand, and whether such engagement is different for different actions (e.g. liking vs sharing).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTo achieve the objectives of this research, sentiment analysis is performed on Facebook insight data from a Fortune 500 company, consisting of fans’ comments, shares and “likes” for promotional and fan posts pertaining to one of its brands. Paired samples t-tests are performed to assess differences in sentiment and engagement before and after each promotional post.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results do not support a strong impact of promotional posts on overall sentiment. However, there is evidence in support of a positive impact of the campaigns on overall wall-level engagement with the brand. Moreover, the levels of engagement are not the same for all promotional posts. Rather, some posts resulted in much higher engagement levels than others, suggesting that not all incentivized campaigns are created equal.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study used the data from only one of company’s many brands. Therefore, similar studies on other brands are warranted.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nSocial networking sites are increasing in numbers, and more and more businesses are embracing social networks and/or blogs as part of their marketing platforms. Many companies offer coupons and incentives on social media to entice customers to engage with their social media platforms as well as buy products. The study results provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of different kinds of social media promotional campaigns, and can help managers decide which campaigns to implement to achieve specific objectives.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research adds to the literature in two ways. First, it contributes to the limited literature on the effectiveness of incentivized social media campaign. Second, it contributes to the social media analytics literature by demonstrating how sentiment analysis can be used along with other statistical procedures to make sense of qualitative social media data.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Business\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-07-2017-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-07-2017-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是根据食品公司Facebook页面上的数据,确定如何最好地为该品牌建立在线拥护者。具体的研究目标是研究诸如“点赞”、分享或评论品牌Facebook等激励行为是否会影响品牌社区的情绪和对品牌的参与,以及这种参与是否因不同的行为而不同(例如点赞与分享)。设计/方法/方法为了实现本研究的目标,我们对一家财富500强公司的Facebook洞察数据进行了情感分析,这些数据包括粉丝对其品牌的宣传和粉丝帖子的评论、分享和“喜欢”。配对样本t检验进行评估的情绪和参与的差异之前和之后的每一个促销帖子。研究结果并不支持宣传帖子对整体情绪的强烈影响。然而,有证据表明,这些活动对品牌的整体参与度产生了积极影响。此外,并不是所有的宣传文章的参与度都是一样的。相反,有些帖子的参与度比其他帖子高得多,这表明并非所有的激励活动都是平等的。研究的局限性/启示该研究使用的数据仅来自该公司众多品牌中的一个。因此,有必要对其他品牌进行类似的研究。实际意义社会网络站点的数量在不断增加,越来越多的企业将社会网络和/或博客作为其营销平台的一部分。许多公司在社交媒体上提供优惠券和奖励,以吸引客户参与他们的社交媒体平台并购买产品。研究结果为不同类型的社交媒体促销活动的有效性提供了有价值的见解,并可以帮助管理人员决定实施哪些活动来实现特定的目标。原创性/价值这项研究在两个方面为文献提供了补充。首先,它导致了关于激励性社交媒体活动有效性的文献有限。其次,它通过展示情感分析如何与其他统计程序一起使用来理解定性社交媒体数据,从而为社交媒体分析文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of incentivized social media campaigns for a Fortune 500 company’s brand
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine how best to build online advocates for a food company’s brand based on data available from the brand’s Facebook pages. Specific research objectives are to study examine whether incentivizing actions such as “liking,” sharing or commenting on a brand’s Facebook impacts the brand community’s sentiment and engagement with the brand, and whether such engagement is different for different actions (e.g. liking vs sharing). Design/methodology/approach To achieve the objectives of this research, sentiment analysis is performed on Facebook insight data from a Fortune 500 company, consisting of fans’ comments, shares and “likes” for promotional and fan posts pertaining to one of its brands. Paired samples t-tests are performed to assess differences in sentiment and engagement before and after each promotional post. Findings The results do not support a strong impact of promotional posts on overall sentiment. However, there is evidence in support of a positive impact of the campaigns on overall wall-level engagement with the brand. Moreover, the levels of engagement are not the same for all promotional posts. Rather, some posts resulted in much higher engagement levels than others, suggesting that not all incentivized campaigns are created equal. Research limitations/implications The study used the data from only one of company’s many brands. Therefore, similar studies on other brands are warranted. Practical implications Social networking sites are increasing in numbers, and more and more businesses are embracing social networks and/or blogs as part of their marketing platforms. Many companies offer coupons and incentives on social media to entice customers to engage with their social media platforms as well as buy products. The study results provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of different kinds of social media promotional campaigns, and can help managers decide which campaigns to implement to achieve specific objectives. Originality/value This research adds to the literature in two ways. First, it contributes to the limited literature on the effectiveness of incentivized social media campaign. Second, it contributes to the social media analytics literature by demonstrating how sentiment analysis can be used along with other statistical procedures to make sense of qualitative social media data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信