COVID-19大流行期间一线临床医生关注的问题:一项定性调查

Rachel Vanderkruik, Helen R. Mizrach, Sydney Crute, Cayley C. Bliss, L. Sylvia, L. Traeger, Daniel L. Hall, C. Luberto, Joanna M. Streck, Amelia M. Stanton, Nevita George, Sara E Looby, D. Mehta, G. Fricchione, E. Park
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间一线临床医生关注的问题:一项定性调查","authors":"Rachel Vanderkruik, Helen R. Mizrach, Sydney Crute, Cayley C. Bliss, L. Sylvia, L. Traeger, Daniel L. Hall, C. Luberto, Joanna M. Streck, Amelia M. Stanton, Nevita George, Sara E Looby, D. Mehta, G. Fricchione, E. Park","doi":"10.5430/JHA.V10N2P21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained healthcare systems worldwide, placing a high psychological burden on frontline clinicians. There is an urgent need to better understand their stressors and determine if stressors differ by clinical role. The present study assessed the concerns among frontline clinicians across a large healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform the development of tailored supportive services. Methods: From March – June 2020, frontline clinicians across the Mass General Brigham healthcare system were invited to register for an adapted mind-body resiliency group program. Clinicians completed preand post-program assessments asking them to report their COVID-19-related concerns. Qualitative data were analyzed in aggregate and by clinical role using content analysis to identify overarching domains. Results: Frontline clinicians’ concerns fall within seven domains: concerns for self, patients, family members, staff, existential concerns, systems-level concerns, and job-level concerns. Concerns for self and existential concerns were most commonly reported across clinical roles. Long-term care clinicians were highly concerned about patients’ wellbeing while rehabilitation therapists were highly concerned about their family members’ health. Across groups, nurse practitioners and physician assistants more often reported job-level concerns. Concerns for staff and systems level concerns were less frequently reported across clinical roles. Conclusions: Frontline clinicians share common pandemic-related concerns, but nuances exist among the concerns most frequently reported across clinical roles. Interventions that offer stress management and resiliency training may be helpful for addressing pandemic-related concerns overall. Future research should determine if tailored support services by clinical role may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"41 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontline clinician concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Vanderkruik, Helen R. Mizrach, Sydney Crute, Cayley C. Bliss, L. Sylvia, L. Traeger, Daniel L. Hall, C. Luberto, Joanna M. Streck, Amelia M. Stanton, Nevita George, Sara E Looby, D. Mehta, G. Fricchione, E. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/JHA.V10N2P21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained healthcare systems worldwide, placing a high psychological burden on frontline clinicians. There is an urgent need to better understand their stressors and determine if stressors differ by clinical role. The present study assessed the concerns among frontline clinicians across a large healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform the development of tailored supportive services. Methods: From March – June 2020, frontline clinicians across the Mass General Brigham healthcare system were invited to register for an adapted mind-body resiliency group program. Clinicians completed preand post-program assessments asking them to report their COVID-19-related concerns. Qualitative data were analyzed in aggregate and by clinical role using content analysis to identify overarching domains. Results: Frontline clinicians’ concerns fall within seven domains: concerns for self, patients, family members, staff, existential concerns, systems-level concerns, and job-level concerns. Concerns for self and existential concerns were most commonly reported across clinical roles. Long-term care clinicians were highly concerned about patients’ wellbeing while rehabilitation therapists were highly concerned about their family members’ health. Across groups, nurse practitioners and physician assistants more often reported job-level concerns. Concerns for staff and systems level concerns were less frequently reported across clinical roles. Conclusions: Frontline clinicians share common pandemic-related concerns, but nuances exist among the concerns most frequently reported across clinical roles. Interventions that offer stress management and resiliency training may be helpful for addressing pandemic-related concerns overall. Future research should determine if tailored support services by clinical role may be warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/JHA.V10N2P21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JHA.V10N2P21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给全球卫生系统带来了压力,给一线临床医生带来了沉重的心理负担。迫切需要更好地了解他们的压力源,并确定压力源是否因临床作用而不同。本研究评估了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间大型医疗保健系统一线临床医生的担忧,为量身定制的支持服务的开发提供信息。方法:从2020年3月至6月,邀请麻省总医院布里格姆医疗保健系统的一线临床医生注册一个适应性身心弹性小组项目。临床医生完成了项目前和项目后的评估,要求他们报告与covid -19相关的担忧。定性数据进行了总体分析,并通过临床角色使用内容分析来确定总体领域。结果:一线临床医生的关注点分为七个领域:对自我、患者、家庭成员、员工的关注、存在性关注、系统层面的关注和工作层面的关注。对自我和存在的关注是临床角色中最常见的。长期护理临床医生高度关注患者的健康,而康复治疗师高度关注其家庭成员的健康。在各个群体中,执业护士和医师助理更多地报告了工作层面的担忧。在临床角色中,对员工和系统级别的关注较少被报道。结论:一线临床医生有共同的大流行相关担忧,但在临床角色中最常报告的担忧之间存在细微差别。提供压力管理和复原力培训的干预措施可能有助于全面解决与大流行病有关的问题。未来的研究应确定是否有必要根据临床角色提供量身定制的支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontline clinician concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained healthcare systems worldwide, placing a high psychological burden on frontline clinicians. There is an urgent need to better understand their stressors and determine if stressors differ by clinical role. The present study assessed the concerns among frontline clinicians across a large healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform the development of tailored supportive services. Methods: From March – June 2020, frontline clinicians across the Mass General Brigham healthcare system were invited to register for an adapted mind-body resiliency group program. Clinicians completed preand post-program assessments asking them to report their COVID-19-related concerns. Qualitative data were analyzed in aggregate and by clinical role using content analysis to identify overarching domains. Results: Frontline clinicians’ concerns fall within seven domains: concerns for self, patients, family members, staff, existential concerns, systems-level concerns, and job-level concerns. Concerns for self and existential concerns were most commonly reported across clinical roles. Long-term care clinicians were highly concerned about patients’ wellbeing while rehabilitation therapists were highly concerned about their family members’ health. Across groups, nurse practitioners and physician assistants more often reported job-level concerns. Concerns for staff and systems level concerns were less frequently reported across clinical roles. Conclusions: Frontline clinicians share common pandemic-related concerns, but nuances exist among the concerns most frequently reported across clinical roles. Interventions that offer stress management and resiliency training may be helpful for addressing pandemic-related concerns overall. Future research should determine if tailored support services by clinical role may be warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信