商队和狂欢节:运动中的表现研究

TDR news Pub Date : 1995-01-23 DOI:10.2307/1146488
D. Conquergood
{"title":"商队和狂欢节:运动中的表现研究","authors":"D. Conquergood","doi":"10.2307/1146488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peggy Phelan has presented us with a challenging exercise: to identify a key issue, a pressing point of intersection between our local institution and the more expansive future of the field-and, she has enjoined us to be brief. I offer the following principle more as a catalyst for opening conversation than a proposition for closing down controversy. The starting point for discussion that I affirm is this: Performance is an essentially contested concept. I borrow this idea from Strine, Long, and Hopkins' fine metadisciplinary essay, \"Research in Interpretation and Performance Studies: Trends, Issues, Priorities\" (I99o).' Thinking about performance as an \"essentially contested concept\" locates disagreement and difference as generative points of departure and coalition for its unfolding meanings and affiliations. Any attempt to define and stabilize performance will be bound up in disagreement, and this disagreement is itself part of its meaning:","PeriodicalId":85611,"journal":{"name":"TDR news","volume":"42 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"127","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Caravans and Carnivals: Performance Studies in Motion\",\"authors\":\"D. Conquergood\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1146488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peggy Phelan has presented us with a challenging exercise: to identify a key issue, a pressing point of intersection between our local institution and the more expansive future of the field-and, she has enjoined us to be brief. I offer the following principle more as a catalyst for opening conversation than a proposition for closing down controversy. The starting point for discussion that I affirm is this: Performance is an essentially contested concept. I borrow this idea from Strine, Long, and Hopkins' fine metadisciplinary essay, \\\"Research in Interpretation and Performance Studies: Trends, Issues, Priorities\\\" (I99o).' Thinking about performance as an \\\"essentially contested concept\\\" locates disagreement and difference as generative points of departure and coalition for its unfolding meanings and affiliations. Any attempt to define and stabilize performance will be bound up in disagreement, and this disagreement is itself part of its meaning:\",\"PeriodicalId\":85611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TDR news\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"127\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TDR news\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1146488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TDR news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1146488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

摘要

佩吉·费兰(Peggy Phelan)给我们提出了一个具有挑战性的问题:找出一个关键问题,一个我们当地机构与该领域更广阔的未来之间的紧迫交叉点——她要求我们简短。我提出以下原则,更多的是作为开启对话的催化剂,而不是作为结束争议的建议。我肯定讨论的出发点是:性能本质上是一个有争议的概念。我从Strine, Long和Hopkins的一篇优秀的元学科论文中借用了这个想法,“口译和表演研究的研究:趋势,问题,优先事项”(1990)。将表演视为一个“本质上有争议的概念”,将分歧和差异定位为其展开意义和从属关系的生成点和出发点。任何定义和稳定业绩的尝试都将陷入分歧,而这种分歧本身就是其意义的一部分:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of Caravans and Carnivals: Performance Studies in Motion
Peggy Phelan has presented us with a challenging exercise: to identify a key issue, a pressing point of intersection between our local institution and the more expansive future of the field-and, she has enjoined us to be brief. I offer the following principle more as a catalyst for opening conversation than a proposition for closing down controversy. The starting point for discussion that I affirm is this: Performance is an essentially contested concept. I borrow this idea from Strine, Long, and Hopkins' fine metadisciplinary essay, "Research in Interpretation and Performance Studies: Trends, Issues, Priorities" (I99o).' Thinking about performance as an "essentially contested concept" locates disagreement and difference as generative points of departure and coalition for its unfolding meanings and affiliations. Any attempt to define and stabilize performance will be bound up in disagreement, and this disagreement is itself part of its meaning:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信