信任妇女:一个进步的基督教关于生育正义的论点

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar
{"title":"信任妇女:一个进步的基督教关于生育正义的论点","authors":"Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar","doi":"10.1080/13558358.2023.2181658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"traditions are necessary for social change, but new visions and languages have to be created as well (113f f.). In addition, Grelle’s attention to Gramsci’s understanding of “ideal interests” in chapter 6 is worth noting (122 ff.). Gramsci challenges orthodox Marxism’s reductionist focus on material interests showing that human life is driven by ideals as well. Moreover, this humanist emphasis allows Grelle to criticize overly suspicious approaches that denigrate human rights as “bourgeois freedoms.” Instead, Grelle stresses the importance of these freedoms in the struggle for justice of subaltern groups. With Gramsci, Grelle criticizes the denigration of certain ideas due to their “sectional” origin. Rather, he offers a compelling argument to see how these ideals can go beyond sectional interests and be universalized for the enhancement of all human life (127–28). What the reader misses in this fine book is some engagement with social movements of Gramscian inspiration. It is unfortunate that Grelle only mentions liberation theology once and in passing (64). To take an example, Gustavo Gutiérrez was deeply influenced by Gramsci and José Carlos Mariátegui’s creative, humanist interpretation of Marxism, an interpretation that he retrieved critically in the development of his theology. Closer attention to this and other concrete appropriations of Gramsci could have enriched the book greatly, especially in its constructive section.","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust women: a progressive Christian argument for reproductive justice\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13558358.2023.2181658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"traditions are necessary for social change, but new visions and languages have to be created as well (113f f.). In addition, Grelle’s attention to Gramsci’s understanding of “ideal interests” in chapter 6 is worth noting (122 ff.). Gramsci challenges orthodox Marxism’s reductionist focus on material interests showing that human life is driven by ideals as well. Moreover, this humanist emphasis allows Grelle to criticize overly suspicious approaches that denigrate human rights as “bourgeois freedoms.” Instead, Grelle stresses the importance of these freedoms in the struggle for justice of subaltern groups. With Gramsci, Grelle criticizes the denigration of certain ideas due to their “sectional” origin. Rather, he offers a compelling argument to see how these ideals can go beyond sectional interests and be universalized for the enhancement of all human life (127–28). What the reader misses in this fine book is some engagement with social movements of Gramscian inspiration. It is unfortunate that Grelle only mentions liberation theology once and in passing (64). To take an example, Gustavo Gutiérrez was deeply influenced by Gramsci and José Carlos Mariátegui’s creative, humanist interpretation of Marxism, an interpretation that he retrieved critically in the development of his theology. Closer attention to this and other concrete appropriations of Gramsci could have enriched the book greatly, especially in its constructive section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2023.2181658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2023.2181658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

传统是社会变革的必要条件,但也必须创造新的愿景和语言。此外,格莱勒在第6章对葛兰西对“理想利益”的理解的关注值得注意(122页后)。葛兰西挑战了正统马克思主义对物质利益的简化论,表明人类生活也是由理想驱动的。此外,这种人文主义的强调使格里尔能够批评那些将人权诋毁为“资产阶级自由”的过度怀疑的方法。相反,格雷尔强调了这些自由在为下层群体争取正义的斗争中的重要性。格莱勒与葛兰西一起,批判了某些思想因其“分支”起源而遭到诋毁的行为。相反,他提供了一个令人信服的论据,看看这些理想如何超越局部利益,并为提高全人类的生活而普遍化(127-28)。读者在这本好书中错过的是一些葛兰西启发下的社会运动。不幸的是,Grelle只提到过一次解放神学,而且是顺带提到的(64)。举个例子,古斯塔沃·古蒂萨雷兹深受葛兰西和约瑟·卡洛斯Mariátegui对马克思主义创造性的、人道主义的解释的影响,这种解释在他的神学发展中得到了批判性的恢复。更密切地关注这一点,以及对葛兰西的其他具体挪用,可以极大地丰富这本书,特别是在其建设性部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust women: a progressive Christian argument for reproductive justice
traditions are necessary for social change, but new visions and languages have to be created as well (113f f.). In addition, Grelle’s attention to Gramsci’s understanding of “ideal interests” in chapter 6 is worth noting (122 ff.). Gramsci challenges orthodox Marxism’s reductionist focus on material interests showing that human life is driven by ideals as well. Moreover, this humanist emphasis allows Grelle to criticize overly suspicious approaches that denigrate human rights as “bourgeois freedoms.” Instead, Grelle stresses the importance of these freedoms in the struggle for justice of subaltern groups. With Gramsci, Grelle criticizes the denigration of certain ideas due to their “sectional” origin. Rather, he offers a compelling argument to see how these ideals can go beyond sectional interests and be universalized for the enhancement of all human life (127–28). What the reader misses in this fine book is some engagement with social movements of Gramscian inspiration. It is unfortunate that Grelle only mentions liberation theology once and in passing (64). To take an example, Gustavo Gutiérrez was deeply influenced by Gramsci and José Carlos Mariátegui’s creative, humanist interpretation of Marxism, an interpretation that he retrieved critically in the development of his theology. Closer attention to this and other concrete appropriations of Gramsci could have enriched the book greatly, especially in its constructive section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信