编程竞赛:通过竞赛学习使用scratch编写代码

{"title":"编程竞赛:通过竞赛学习使用scratch编写代码","authors":"","doi":"10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are\ndiscussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators\nand 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition\nand its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from\nthe Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were\nprocessed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the\ndifferent computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of\nthe Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic,\nand computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased\nfrom 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm,\nshowing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices.","PeriodicalId":23534,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5, Issue 4","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using\\nScratch\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are\\ndiscussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators\\nand 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition\\nand its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from\\nthe Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were\\nprocessed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the\\ndifferent computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of\\nthe Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic,\\nand computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased\\nfrom 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm,\\nshowing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5, Issue 4\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5, Issue 4\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5, Issue 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46243/jst.2020.v5.i4.pp40-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们讨论了指导Codecraft竞赛发展的设计原则,以及使竞赛对每个人都有吸引力的策略。我们还随机抽取了30名参加比赛的教育工作者和30名学生进行访谈,了解他们对比赛的看法,以及比赛对他们的计算思维和创造力的影响。此外,由Scratch程序代码组成的85个项目在2016年至2018年的最后一轮比赛中提交,使用名为Dr Scratch的在线分析工具进行处理。为了确定学生的进步,对不同的计算思维概念进行了更深入的分析。研究表明,在三年的Codecraft竞赛中,在编程概念、逻辑和计算实践的使用方面有了显著的进步。此外,项目的平均计算思维(CT)得分从2016年的11.8分上升到2017年的14.2分和2018年的16.0分。通过积极的基于竞赛的方法学习计算概念也突出了一些优势,如动机、乐趣、承诺和热情,显示出与创造力、计算思维和计算实践相关的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Codecraft Competition: Learning to Code Through Contests Using Scratch
In this article, the design principles that guided the development of the Codecraft competition are discussed together with strategies for making the contest engaging for everyone. A random selection of 30 educators and 30 students who participated in the contests were also interviewed to find out their views about the competition and its impact on their computational thinking and creativity skills. Furthermore, 85 projects made up of codes from the Scratch program and submitted during the final round of the contest during the years 2016 to 2018 were processed using an online analytical tool known as Dr Scratch. To identify the progress made by the students, the different computational thinking concepts were analysed more deeply. The study revealed that over three years of the Codecraft competition, there was a significant improvement regarding the use of programming concepts, logic, and computational practices. Moreover, the average computational thinking (CT) score of the projects increased from 11.8 in 2016 to 14.2 in 2017 and 16.0 in 2018. Learning of computational concepts through an active contestbased approach also highlighted several advantages, such as motivation, fun, commitment, and enthusiasm, showing improvements related to creativity, computational thinking, and computational practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信