通过对推特和在线数据门户网站的分析,改进从卫星获取的InSAR地质灾害数据的传播战略

Q2 Social Sciences
C. Watson, J. Elliott, S. Ebmeier, J. Biggs, F. Albino, S. Brown, Helen Burns, A. Hooper, M. Lazecký, Y. Maghsoudi, R. Rigby, T. Wright
{"title":"通过对推特和在线数据门户网站的分析,改进从卫星获取的InSAR地质灾害数据的传播战略","authors":"C. Watson, J. Elliott, S. Ebmeier, J. Biggs, F. Albino, S. Brown, Helen Burns, A. Hooper, M. Lazecký, Y. Maghsoudi, R. Rigby, T. Wright","doi":"10.5194/gc-6-75-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Satellite-based earth observation sensors are increasingly able to monitor\ngeophysical signals related to natural hazards, and many groups are working\non rapid data acquisition, processing, and dissemination to data users with\na wide range of expertise and goals. A particular challenge in the\nmeaningful dissemination of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR)\ndata to non-expert users is its unique differential data structure and\nsometimes low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we evaluate the online\ndissemination of ground deformation measurements from InSAR through Twitter,\nalongside the provision of open-access InSAR data from the Centre for\nObservation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET)\nLooking Into Continents from Space with Synthetic Aperture Radar (LiCSAR)\nprocessing system. Our aim is to evaluate (1) who interacts with\ndisseminated InSAR data, (2) how the data are used, and (3) to discuss\nstrategies for meaningful communication and dissemination of open InSAR\ndata. We found that the InSAR Twitter community was primarily composed of\nnon-scientists (62 %), although this grouping included earth observation\nexperts in applications such as commercial industries. Twitter activity was\nprimarily associated with natural hazard response, specifically following\nearthquakes and volcanic activity, where users disseminated InSAR\nmeasurements of ground deformation, often using wrapped and unwrapped\ninterferograms. For earthquake events, Sentinel-1 data were acquired,\nprocessed, and tweeted within 4.7±2.8 d (the shortest was 1 d).\nOpen-access Sentinel-1 data dominated the InSAR tweets and were applied to\nvolcanic and earthquake events in the most engaged-with (retweeted) content.\nOpen-access InSAR data provided by LiCSAR were widely accessed, including\nautomatically processed and tweeted interferograms and interactive event\npages revealing ground deformation following earthquake events. The further\nwork required to integrate dissemination of InSAR data into longer-term\ndisaster risk-reduction strategies is highly specific, to both hazard type and\ninternational community of practice, as well as to local political setting and civil\nprotection mandates. Notably, communication of uncertainties and processing\nmethodologies are still lacking. We conclude by outlining the future\ndirection of COMET LiCSAR products to maximize their useability.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for improving the communication of satellite-derived InSAR data for geohazards through the analysis of Twitter and online data portals\",\"authors\":\"C. Watson, J. Elliott, S. Ebmeier, J. Biggs, F. Albino, S. Brown, Helen Burns, A. Hooper, M. Lazecký, Y. Maghsoudi, R. Rigby, T. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gc-6-75-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Satellite-based earth observation sensors are increasingly able to monitor\\ngeophysical signals related to natural hazards, and many groups are working\\non rapid data acquisition, processing, and dissemination to data users with\\na wide range of expertise and goals. A particular challenge in the\\nmeaningful dissemination of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR)\\ndata to non-expert users is its unique differential data structure and\\nsometimes low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we evaluate the online\\ndissemination of ground deformation measurements from InSAR through Twitter,\\nalongside the provision of open-access InSAR data from the Centre for\\nObservation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET)\\nLooking Into Continents from Space with Synthetic Aperture Radar (LiCSAR)\\nprocessing system. Our aim is to evaluate (1) who interacts with\\ndisseminated InSAR data, (2) how the data are used, and (3) to discuss\\nstrategies for meaningful communication and dissemination of open InSAR\\ndata. We found that the InSAR Twitter community was primarily composed of\\nnon-scientists (62 %), although this grouping included earth observation\\nexperts in applications such as commercial industries. Twitter activity was\\nprimarily associated with natural hazard response, specifically following\\nearthquakes and volcanic activity, where users disseminated InSAR\\nmeasurements of ground deformation, often using wrapped and unwrapped\\ninterferograms. For earthquake events, Sentinel-1 data were acquired,\\nprocessed, and tweeted within 4.7±2.8 d (the shortest was 1 d).\\nOpen-access Sentinel-1 data dominated the InSAR tweets and were applied to\\nvolcanic and earthquake events in the most engaged-with (retweeted) content.\\nOpen-access InSAR data provided by LiCSAR were widely accessed, including\\nautomatically processed and tweeted interferograms and interactive event\\npages revealing ground deformation following earthquake events. The further\\nwork required to integrate dissemination of InSAR data into longer-term\\ndisaster risk-reduction strategies is highly specific, to both hazard type and\\ninternational community of practice, as well as to local political setting and civil\\nprotection mandates. Notably, communication of uncertainties and processing\\nmethodologies are still lacking. We conclude by outlining the future\\ndirection of COMET LiCSAR products to maximize their useability.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":52877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-75-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-75-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要基于卫星的地球观测传感器越来越能够监测与自然灾害有关的地球物理信号,许多团体正在致力于快速数据采集、处理和传播给具有广泛专业知识和目标的数据用户。干涉合成孔径雷达(InSAR)数据向非专业用户有意义传播的一个特殊挑战是其独特的差分数据结构和有时较低的信噪比。在本研究中,我们通过Twitter评估了InSAR地面变形测量的在线传播,同时提供了来自地震、火山和构造观测和建模中心(COMET)的开放获取InSAR数据,该中心使用合成孔径雷达(LiCSAR)处理系统从太空观察大陆。我们的目的是评估(1)谁与传播的InSAR数据进行交互,(2)如何使用数据,以及(3)讨论开放InSAR数据的有意义的沟通和传播策略。我们发现,InSAR Twitter社区主要由非科学家(62%)组成,尽管这一群体包括商业行业等应用领域的地球观测专家。Twitter活动主要与自然灾害反应有关,特别是在地震和火山活动之后,用户传播insar测量的地面变形,通常使用包裹和未包裹的干涉图。对于地震事件,Sentinel-1数据的采集、处理和推特时间为4.7±2.8 d(最短1 d)。开放获取的Sentinel-1数据主导了InSAR推文,并应用于最受关注(转发)内容的火山和地震事件。LiCSAR提供的开放获取InSAR数据被广泛获取,包括自动处理和推特干涉图以及显示地震事件后地面变形的交互式事件页面。将InSAR数据的传播纳入长期减少灾害风险战略所需的进一步工作是高度具体的,既针对灾害类型,也针对国际实践社会,也针对当地政治环境和民事保护任务。值得注意的是,不确定性和处理方法的交流仍然缺乏。最后,我们概述了COMET LiCSAR产品的未来方向,以最大限度地提高其可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for improving the communication of satellite-derived InSAR data for geohazards through the analysis of Twitter and online data portals
Abstract. Satellite-based earth observation sensors are increasingly able to monitor geophysical signals related to natural hazards, and many groups are working on rapid data acquisition, processing, and dissemination to data users with a wide range of expertise and goals. A particular challenge in the meaningful dissemination of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data to non-expert users is its unique differential data structure and sometimes low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we evaluate the online dissemination of ground deformation measurements from InSAR through Twitter, alongside the provision of open-access InSAR data from the Centre for Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET) Looking Into Continents from Space with Synthetic Aperture Radar (LiCSAR) processing system. Our aim is to evaluate (1) who interacts with disseminated InSAR data, (2) how the data are used, and (3) to discuss strategies for meaningful communication and dissemination of open InSAR data. We found that the InSAR Twitter community was primarily composed of non-scientists (62 %), although this grouping included earth observation experts in applications such as commercial industries. Twitter activity was primarily associated with natural hazard response, specifically following earthquakes and volcanic activity, where users disseminated InSAR measurements of ground deformation, often using wrapped and unwrapped interferograms. For earthquake events, Sentinel-1 data were acquired, processed, and tweeted within 4.7±2.8 d (the shortest was 1 d). Open-access Sentinel-1 data dominated the InSAR tweets and were applied to volcanic and earthquake events in the most engaged-with (retweeted) content. Open-access InSAR data provided by LiCSAR were widely accessed, including automatically processed and tweeted interferograms and interactive event pages revealing ground deformation following earthquake events. The further work required to integrate dissemination of InSAR data into longer-term disaster risk-reduction strategies is highly specific, to both hazard type and international community of practice, as well as to local political setting and civil protection mandates. Notably, communication of uncertainties and processing methodologies are still lacking. We conclude by outlining the future direction of COMET LiCSAR products to maximize their useability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信