{"title":"取栓后的脑循环时间:急性卒中再通后预后的潜在预测因子","authors":"Jia-Qi Wang, Ying-Jia Wang, Jingsong Qiu, Wei Li, Xian-Hui Sun, Yong-Gang Zhao, Xin Liu, Ziai Zhao, Liang Liu, Thanh N. Nguyen, Huisheng Chen","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.122.025853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite successful recanalization, up to half of patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusion treated with endovascular treatment (EVT) do not recover to functional independence. We aim to evaluate the role of cerebral circulation time (CCT) as outcome predictor after EVT. Methods and Results We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion undergoing EVT. Three categories of CCT based on digital subtraction angiography were studied: CCT of the stroke side, CCT of the healthy side), and change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side. Dramatic clinical recovery was defined as a 24‐hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤2 or ≥8 points drop. A modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 3 months was considered a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prediction of CCT on prognosis. One hundred patients were enrolled, of which 38 (38.0%) experienced a dramatic clinical recovery and 43 (43.0%) achieved a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis found that shorter change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side and CCT of the stroke side were independent positive prognostic factors for dramatic clinical recovery (odds ratio [OR], 0.189; P=0.033; OR, 0.581; P=0.035) and favorable outcomes (OR, 0.142; P=0.020; OR, 0.581; P=0.046) after adjustment for potential confounders. A model including the change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side also had significantly higher area under the curve values compared with the baseline model in patients with dramatic clinical recovery (0.780 versus 0.742) or favorable outcome (0.759 versus 0.713). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report that CCT based on digital subtraction angiography data exhibits an independent predictive performance for clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion after EVT. Given that this readily available CCT can provide alternative perfusion information during EVT, a prospective, multicenter trial is warranted.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral Circulation Time After Thrombectomy: A Potential Predictor of Outcome After Recanalization in Acute Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Qi Wang, Ying-Jia Wang, Jingsong Qiu, Wei Li, Xian-Hui Sun, Yong-Gang Zhao, Xin Liu, Ziai Zhao, Liang Liu, Thanh N. Nguyen, Huisheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.122.025853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite successful recanalization, up to half of patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusion treated with endovascular treatment (EVT) do not recover to functional independence. We aim to evaluate the role of cerebral circulation time (CCT) as outcome predictor after EVT. Methods and Results We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion undergoing EVT. Three categories of CCT based on digital subtraction angiography were studied: CCT of the stroke side, CCT of the healthy side), and change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side. Dramatic clinical recovery was defined as a 24‐hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤2 or ≥8 points drop. A modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 3 months was considered a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prediction of CCT on prognosis. One hundred patients were enrolled, of which 38 (38.0%) experienced a dramatic clinical recovery and 43 (43.0%) achieved a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis found that shorter change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side and CCT of the stroke side were independent positive prognostic factors for dramatic clinical recovery (odds ratio [OR], 0.189; P=0.033; OR, 0.581; P=0.035) and favorable outcomes (OR, 0.142; P=0.020; OR, 0.581; P=0.046) after adjustment for potential confounders. A model including the change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side also had significantly higher area under the curve values compared with the baseline model in patients with dramatic clinical recovery (0.780 versus 0.742) or favorable outcome (0.759 versus 0.713). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report that CCT based on digital subtraction angiography data exhibits an independent predictive performance for clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion after EVT. Given that this readily available CCT can provide alternative perfusion information during EVT, a prospective, multicenter trial is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
尽管血管再通成功,但在接受血管内治疗(EVT)的大血管闭塞引起的急性缺血性卒中患者中,有多达一半的患者不能恢复功能独立。我们的目的是评估脑循环时间(CCT)作为EVT后预后预测因子的作用。方法和结果我们回顾性地招募了连续的急性缺血性卒中大血管闭塞患者进行EVT。研究了基于数字减影血管造影的三种CCT:卒中侧CCT、健康侧CCT,以及卒中侧CCT与健康侧CCT的变化。显著的临床恢复被定义为24小时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分下降≤2或≥8分。3个月时改良Rankin量表评分≤2分被认为是一个有利的结果。采用Logistic回归分析评估CCT对预后的预测。100例患者入组,其中38例(38.0%)临床恢复显著,43例(43.0%)预后良好。Logistic回归分析发现,卒中侧CCT较健康侧和卒中侧CCT变化较短是显著临床恢复的独立阳性预后因素(优势比[OR], 0.189;P = 0.033;或者,0.581;P=0.035)和良好结局(OR, 0.142;P = 0.020;或者,0.581;P=0.046),校正了潜在混杂因素。与基线模型相比,包含卒中侧CCT与健康侧CCT变化的模型在临床恢复显著(0.780 vs 0.742)或预后良好(0.759 vs 0.713)的患者曲线下面积值也显著更高。据我们所知,这是首次报道基于数字减影血管造影数据的CCT对EVT后急性缺血性卒中大血管闭塞患者的临床结果具有独立的预测作用。鉴于这种现成的CCT可以在EVT期间提供替代灌注信息,因此有必要进行前瞻性的多中心试验。
Cerebral Circulation Time After Thrombectomy: A Potential Predictor of Outcome After Recanalization in Acute Stroke
Background Despite successful recanalization, up to half of patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large‐vessel occlusion treated with endovascular treatment (EVT) do not recover to functional independence. We aim to evaluate the role of cerebral circulation time (CCT) as outcome predictor after EVT. Methods and Results We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion undergoing EVT. Three categories of CCT based on digital subtraction angiography were studied: CCT of the stroke side, CCT of the healthy side), and change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side. Dramatic clinical recovery was defined as a 24‐hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤2 or ≥8 points drop. A modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 3 months was considered a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prediction of CCT on prognosis. One hundred patients were enrolled, of which 38 (38.0%) experienced a dramatic clinical recovery and 43 (43.0%) achieved a favorable outcome. Logistic regression analysis found that shorter change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side and CCT of the stroke side were independent positive prognostic factors for dramatic clinical recovery (odds ratio [OR], 0.189; P=0.033; OR, 0.581; P=0.035) and favorable outcomes (OR, 0.142; P=0.020; OR, 0.581; P=0.046) after adjustment for potential confounders. A model including the change of CCT of the stroke side versus CCT of the healthy side also had significantly higher area under the curve values compared with the baseline model in patients with dramatic clinical recovery (0.780 versus 0.742) or favorable outcome (0.759 versus 0.713). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report that CCT based on digital subtraction angiography data exhibits an independent predictive performance for clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke–large‐vessel occlusion after EVT. Given that this readily available CCT can provide alternative perfusion information during EVT, a prospective, multicenter trial is warranted.