基于不确定性评价的区间机器人定位

Yuehan Jiang, Aaronkumar Ehambram, Bernardo Wagner
{"title":"基于不确定性评价的区间机器人定位","authors":"Yuehan Jiang, Aaronkumar Ehambram, Bernardo Wagner","doi":"10.5220/0011143700003271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Being able to provide trustworthy localization for a robot in a map is essential for various tasks with safety-related requirements. In contrast to classical probabilistic approaches that represent the uncertainty as a Gaussian distribution, we use interval error bounds for the uncertainty estimation of a localization problem. To tackle and identify the limitations of probabilistic localization uncertainty estimation, we carry out comparison experiments between an interval-based method and a factor graph-based probabilistic method. Different measurement error models are propagated by the two methods to derive the robot pose uncertainty estimates. Results show that the probabilistic approach can provide very good pose uncertainty when there is no non-Gaussian systematic sensor error. However, if the measurements have unmodeled systematic errors, the interval approach is able to robustly contain the true poses whereas the probabilistic approach gives completely wrong results.","PeriodicalId":6436,"journal":{"name":"2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2010)","volume":"60 1","pages":"296-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interval-based Robot Localization with Uncertainty Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Yuehan Jiang, Aaronkumar Ehambram, Bernardo Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0011143700003271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Being able to provide trustworthy localization for a robot in a map is essential for various tasks with safety-related requirements. In contrast to classical probabilistic approaches that represent the uncertainty as a Gaussian distribution, we use interval error bounds for the uncertainty estimation of a localization problem. To tackle and identify the limitations of probabilistic localization uncertainty estimation, we carry out comparison experiments between an interval-based method and a factor graph-based probabilistic method. Different measurement error models are propagated by the two methods to derive the robot pose uncertainty estimates. Results show that the probabilistic approach can provide very good pose uncertainty when there is no non-Gaussian systematic sensor error. However, if the measurements have unmodeled systematic errors, the interval approach is able to robustly contain the true poses whereas the probabilistic approach gives completely wrong results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2010)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"296-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2010)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011143700003271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 2nd International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (CAR 2010)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0011143700003271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能够在地图上为机器人提供可靠的定位对于各种具有安全相关要求的任务至关重要。与将不确定性表示为高斯分布的经典概率方法相反,我们使用区间误差界来估计局部化问题的不确定性。为了解决和识别概率定位不确定性估计的局限性,我们对基于区间的方法和基于因子图的概率方法进行了比较实验。通过两种方法传播不同的测量误差模型,得出机器人位姿不确定性估计。结果表明,在不存在非高斯系统传感器误差的情况下,概率方法可以提供很好的姿态不确定性。然而,如果测量有未建模的系统误差,区间方法能够鲁棒地包含真实的姿态,而概率方法给出完全错误的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interval-based Robot Localization with Uncertainty Evaluation
: Being able to provide trustworthy localization for a robot in a map is essential for various tasks with safety-related requirements. In contrast to classical probabilistic approaches that represent the uncertainty as a Gaussian distribution, we use interval error bounds for the uncertainty estimation of a localization problem. To tackle and identify the limitations of probabilistic localization uncertainty estimation, we carry out comparison experiments between an interval-based method and a factor graph-based probabilistic method. Different measurement error models are propagated by the two methods to derive the robot pose uncertainty estimates. Results show that the probabilistic approach can provide very good pose uncertainty when there is no non-Gaussian systematic sensor error. However, if the measurements have unmodeled systematic errors, the interval approach is able to robustly contain the true poses whereas the probabilistic approach gives completely wrong results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信