{"title":"电化学抛光诱发亚稳奥氏体不锈钢马氏体相变","authors":"Hojun Gwon, D. H. Kim, D. Chae, Sung-Joon Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3729653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We determined that a severe martensitic transformation during electrochemical polishing (EP) in 16Cr-5Ni metastable austenitic stainless steel was caused solely by EP. The specimen was treated by EP, then sealed in a quartz tube to protect the surface, then annealed at 1150 °C to form a single austenite phase, and again subjected to EP. As the duration of the second EP increased, the fraction of martensite increased to 72.2% when the duration is 160s at 20V of voltage. However, Ferritescope measurements showed that the martensite fraction of the whole specimen was < 1%; comparison of these results suggests that the martensite transformation by EP was limited to the surface. Calculation of the temperature-dependent difference in Gibbs free energy between α’ martensite and austenite confirmed that the energy applied to the specimen during EP is sufficient to cause martensitic transformation at room temperature.","PeriodicalId":11974,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Martensitic Transformation Induced by Electro-Chemical Polishing in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel\",\"authors\":\"Hojun Gwon, D. H. Kim, D. Chae, Sung-Joon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3729653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We determined that a severe martensitic transformation during electrochemical polishing (EP) in 16Cr-5Ni metastable austenitic stainless steel was caused solely by EP. The specimen was treated by EP, then sealed in a quartz tube to protect the surface, then annealed at 1150 °C to form a single austenite phase, and again subjected to EP. As the duration of the second EP increased, the fraction of martensite increased to 72.2% when the duration is 160s at 20V of voltage. However, Ferritescope measurements showed that the martensite fraction of the whole specimen was < 1%; comparison of these results suggests that the martensite transformation by EP was limited to the surface. Calculation of the temperature-dependent difference in Gibbs free energy between α’ martensite and austenite confirmed that the energy applied to the specimen during EP is sufficient to cause martensitic transformation at room temperature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Engineering Design Process (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Martensitic Transformation Induced by Electro-Chemical Polishing in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel
We determined that a severe martensitic transformation during electrochemical polishing (EP) in 16Cr-5Ni metastable austenitic stainless steel was caused solely by EP. The specimen was treated by EP, then sealed in a quartz tube to protect the surface, then annealed at 1150 °C to form a single austenite phase, and again subjected to EP. As the duration of the second EP increased, the fraction of martensite increased to 72.2% when the duration is 160s at 20V of voltage. However, Ferritescope measurements showed that the martensite fraction of the whole specimen was < 1%; comparison of these results suggests that the martensite transformation by EP was limited to the surface. Calculation of the temperature-dependent difference in Gibbs free energy between α’ martensite and austenite confirmed that the energy applied to the specimen during EP is sufficient to cause martensitic transformation at room temperature.