理论化权力,身份和嘻哈:走向酷儿,交叉的方法

K. Berggren
{"title":"理论化权力,身份和嘻哈:走向酷儿,交叉的方法","authors":"K. Berggren","doi":"10.24834/educare.2016.2.1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power and identity are central themes in hip hop scholarship, whether it is race and class that are in focus, or gender and sexuality, or a combination. Yet power and identity are contested concepts that are used with varying theoretical outlooks. This article seeks to outline some key differences between different understandings of power and identity, and their consequences for the study of hip hop. Four models are identified. In the expression model, hip hop is understood as the cultural expression of a specific group. In contrast, the catalogization model and the two-plane model both acknowledge the existence of different dimensions of power and identity, but treat these either in a list-like manner or according to a base-superstructure dichotomy. The limitations of these two models can be overcome, it is suggested, by turning to the complexity model, which builds on contemporary feminist, intersectionality and queer theory.","PeriodicalId":34339,"journal":{"name":"Educare","volume":"11 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theorizing Power, Identity and Hip Hop: Towards a Queer, Intersectional Approach\",\"authors\":\"K. Berggren\",\"doi\":\"10.24834/educare.2016.2.1065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power and identity are central themes in hip hop scholarship, whether it is race and class that are in focus, or gender and sexuality, or a combination. Yet power and identity are contested concepts that are used with varying theoretical outlooks. This article seeks to outline some key differences between different understandings of power and identity, and their consequences for the study of hip hop. Four models are identified. In the expression model, hip hop is understood as the cultural expression of a specific group. In contrast, the catalogization model and the two-plane model both acknowledge the existence of different dimensions of power and identity, but treat these either in a list-like manner or according to a base-superstructure dichotomy. The limitations of these two models can be overcome, it is suggested, by turning to the complexity model, which builds on contemporary feminist, intersectionality and queer theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educare\",\"volume\":\"11 10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2016.2.1065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2016.2.1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

权力和身份是嘻哈学术研究的中心主题,无论是关注的是种族和阶级,还是性别和性取向,或者两者的结合。然而,权力和身份是有争议的概念,在不同的理论观点中使用。本文旨在概述对权力和身份的不同理解之间的一些关键差异,以及它们对嘻哈研究的影响。确定了四种模型。在表达模型中,hip hop被理解为特定群体的文化表达。相比之下,分类模型和双平面模型都承认权力和身份的不同维度的存在,但要么以类似列表的方式对待它们,要么根据基础-上层建筑的二分法来对待它们。这两种模型的局限性可以通过转向复杂性模型来克服,该模型建立在当代女权主义、交叉性和酷儿理论的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theorizing Power, Identity and Hip Hop: Towards a Queer, Intersectional Approach
Power and identity are central themes in hip hop scholarship, whether it is race and class that are in focus, or gender and sexuality, or a combination. Yet power and identity are contested concepts that are used with varying theoretical outlooks. This article seeks to outline some key differences between different understandings of power and identity, and their consequences for the study of hip hop. Four models are identified. In the expression model, hip hop is understood as the cultural expression of a specific group. In contrast, the catalogization model and the two-plane model both acknowledge the existence of different dimensions of power and identity, but treat these either in a list-like manner or according to a base-superstructure dichotomy. The limitations of these two models can be overcome, it is suggested, by turning to the complexity model, which builds on contemporary feminist, intersectionality and queer theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信