在新鲜胚胎移植的正常应答者中,GnRH激动剂触发后hCG补充的疗效:来自越南的病例对照分析

Q3 Medicine
M. Le, N.S.V. Le, N.Q.T. Tran, Q. Nguyen, T. N. Cao
{"title":"在新鲜胚胎移植的正常应答者中,GnRH激动剂触发后hCG补充的疗效:来自越南的病例对照分析","authors":"M. Le, N.S.V. Le, N.Q.T. Tran, Q. Nguyen, T. N. Cao","doi":"10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to assess the effects of a dual trigger by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with normal ovarian response.Materials and Methods. This case-control analysis comprised 118 patients who responded normally to ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol at Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vietnam, between January 2018 and October 2019. Recruitment was achieved through case-control matching: a case (with Dual trigger – group A) was paired with control (with hCG trigger – group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary markers of success were the retrieval of oocytes and embryological data, the pregnancy rate, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results. 59 patients in group A and 59 women in group B were recruited. Two groups had comparable patient characteristics and ovarian reserve. The initial dose, total dose, duration of gonadotropin administration, and peak of estradiol level were not statistically different across groups. The number of recovered oocytes (10.3 ± 4.2 vs. 10.0 ± 3.3; p = 0.663), mature oocytes (8.6 ± 3.7 vs.8.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.346), and high-quality embryos (56.2 ± 28.9 vs. 59.8 ± 35.9; p = 0.555) was equivalent. Fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were comparable between the dual trigger and hCG groups. In neither group were any occurrences of OHSS seen.Conclusion. Dual trigger may substitute hCG for final oocyte maturation and fresh embryo transfer in patients with normal responses to GnRH antagonist protocol-induced ovarian stimulation without compromising IVF outcomes.","PeriodicalId":36521,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of GnRH agonist trigger followed by hCG add-back in normal responders for fresh embryo transfer: a case-control analysis from Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"M. Le, N.S.V. Le, N.Q.T. Tran, Q. Nguyen, T. N. Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: to assess the effects of a dual trigger by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with normal ovarian response.Materials and Methods. This case-control analysis comprised 118 patients who responded normally to ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol at Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vietnam, between January 2018 and October 2019. Recruitment was achieved through case-control matching: a case (with Dual trigger – group A) was paired with control (with hCG trigger – group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary markers of success were the retrieval of oocytes and embryological data, the pregnancy rate, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results. 59 patients in group A and 59 women in group B were recruited. Two groups had comparable patient characteristics and ovarian reserve. The initial dose, total dose, duration of gonadotropin administration, and peak of estradiol level were not statistically different across groups. The number of recovered oocytes (10.3 ± 4.2 vs. 10.0 ± 3.3; p = 0.663), mature oocytes (8.6 ± 3.7 vs.8.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.346), and high-quality embryos (56.2 ± 28.9 vs. 59.8 ± 35.9; p = 0.555) was equivalent. Fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were comparable between the dual trigger and hCG groups. In neither group were any occurrences of OHSS seen.Conclusion. Dual trigger may substitute hCG for final oocyte maturation and fresh embryo transfer in patients with normal responses to GnRH antagonist protocol-induced ovarian stimulation without compromising IVF outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂和低剂量人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)双重触发对卵巢反应正常妇女体外受精(IVF)结果的影响。材料与方法。该病例对照分析包括2018年1月至2019年10月期间在越南顺化生殖内分泌和不孕症中心使用GnRH拮抗剂方案对卵巢刺激反应正常的118例患者。招募通过病例-对照匹配实现:病例(双触发- a组)与对照组(hCG触发- B组)按1:1的比例配对。成功的主要标志是卵母细胞和胚胎学数据的检索,妊娠率和卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的发生率。A组59例,B组59例。两组患者特征和卵巢储备相似。各组间促性腺激素初始剂量、总剂量、给药时间、雌二醇峰值水平差异无统计学意义。恢复卵母细胞数(10.3±4.2 vs. 10.0±3.3);P = 0.663),成熟卵母细胞(8.6±3.7 vs.8.1±2.8;P = 0.346),优质胚胎(56.2±28.9∶59.8±35.9;P = 0.555)相等。受精、临床妊娠和活产率在双触发组和hCG组之间具有可比性。两组均未见OHSS的发生。在GnRH拮抗剂方案诱导的卵巢刺激反应正常的患者中,双触发可能替代hCG进行最终卵母细胞成熟和新鲜胚胎移植,而不会影响IVF结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of GnRH agonist trigger followed by hCG add-back in normal responders for fresh embryo transfer: a case-control analysis from Vietnam
Aim: to assess the effects of a dual trigger by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with normal ovarian response.Materials and Methods. This case-control analysis comprised 118 patients who responded normally to ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol at Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vietnam, between January 2018 and October 2019. Recruitment was achieved through case-control matching: a case (with Dual trigger – group A) was paired with control (with hCG trigger – group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary markers of success were the retrieval of oocytes and embryological data, the pregnancy rate, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results. 59 patients in group A and 59 women in group B were recruited. Two groups had comparable patient characteristics and ovarian reserve. The initial dose, total dose, duration of gonadotropin administration, and peak of estradiol level were not statistically different across groups. The number of recovered oocytes (10.3 ± 4.2 vs. 10.0 ± 3.3; p = 0.663), mature oocytes (8.6 ± 3.7 vs.8.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.346), and high-quality embryos (56.2 ± 28.9 vs. 59.8 ± 35.9; p = 0.555) was equivalent. Fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were comparable between the dual trigger and hCG groups. In neither group were any occurrences of OHSS seen.Conclusion. Dual trigger may substitute hCG for final oocyte maturation and fresh embryo transfer in patients with normal responses to GnRH antagonist protocol-induced ovarian stimulation without compromising IVF outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信