基于fnir的脑机接口人工神经网络与支持向量机分类的比较

Noman Naseer, K. Hong, M. Jawad Khan, M. Raheel Bhutta
{"title":"基于fnir的脑机接口人工神经网络与支持向量机分类的比较","authors":"Noman Naseer, K. Hong, M. Jawad Khan, M. Raheel Bhutta","doi":"10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we analyze and compare the performance of support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) for classification of fNIRS signals. fNIRS signals due to mental arithmetic and mental counting are acquired from the prefrontal cortex of ten healthy subjects. After preprocessing and filtering, SVM and ANN classification is performed on the same feature set - mean and slope of the changes in concentration of oxy-hemoglobin. Although no significant difference in the average classification accuracies, obtained using SVM and ANN, is observed (p = 0.2); it is noted that the standard deviation of classification accuracies using ANN is significantly higher than that of SVM. Furthermore, the computational speed of SVM is significantly higher than that of ANN. It is concluded that SVM offers stable classification accuracies and fast computation as compared to ANN.","PeriodicalId":6641,"journal":{"name":"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)","volume":"49 1","pages":"1817-1821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of artificial neural network and support vector machine classifications for fNIRS-based BCI\",\"authors\":\"Noman Naseer, K. Hong, M. Jawad Khan, M. Raheel Bhutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we analyze and compare the performance of support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) for classification of fNIRS signals. fNIRS signals due to mental arithmetic and mental counting are acquired from the prefrontal cortex of ten healthy subjects. After preprocessing and filtering, SVM and ANN classification is performed on the same feature set - mean and slope of the changes in concentration of oxy-hemoglobin. Although no significant difference in the average classification accuracies, obtained using SVM and ANN, is observed (p = 0.2); it is noted that the standard deviation of classification accuracies using ANN is significantly higher than that of SVM. Furthermore, the computational speed of SVM is significantly higher than that of ANN. It is concluded that SVM offers stable classification accuracies and fast computation as compared to ANN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"1817-1821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文分析比较了支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)对近红外光谱信号的分类性能。从10个健康受试者的前额叶皮层获取心算和心数引起的近红外信号。经过预处理和滤波,SVM和ANN对同一特征集氧血红蛋白浓度变化的均值和斜率进行分类。虽然使用支持向量机和人工神经网络获得的平均分类准确率没有显著差异(p = 0.2);使用人工神经网络的分类准确率标准差明显高于支持向量机。此外,支持向量机的计算速度明显高于人工神经网络。结果表明,与人工神经网络相比,支持向量机分类精度稳定,计算速度快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of artificial neural network and support vector machine classifications for fNIRS-based BCI
In this paper we analyze and compare the performance of support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) for classification of fNIRS signals. fNIRS signals due to mental arithmetic and mental counting are acquired from the prefrontal cortex of ten healthy subjects. After preprocessing and filtering, SVM and ANN classification is performed on the same feature set - mean and slope of the changes in concentration of oxy-hemoglobin. Although no significant difference in the average classification accuracies, obtained using SVM and ANN, is observed (p = 0.2); it is noted that the standard deviation of classification accuracies using ANN is significantly higher than that of SVM. Furthermore, the computational speed of SVM is significantly higher than that of ANN. It is concluded that SVM offers stable classification accuracies and fast computation as compared to ANN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信