{"title":"基于密钥的加密数据传输与无密钥安全传输的保密率比较","authors":"Ziyao Yu, Zijie Ji, Phee Lep Yeoh","doi":"10.1109/GCWkshps52748.2021.9682116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the secrecy rate of two general PHY security approaches of keyless secure transmission (ST) and key-based encrypted data transmission (EDT) in a multiple-input single-output, single eavesdropper (MISOSE) system. Specifically, closed-form approximations of the secrecy rate for both schemes are derived for the same coherence interval and under uncertain eavesdropper location. Our results highlight that the secrecy rate of ST is highly dependent on the propagation distance between the transmitter and the eavesdropper, whilst EDT is more impacted by the coherence interval and transmit power. Numerical simulations based on the IMT-2020 channel model are presented to support our analytical results. Our results clearly highlight different regions where ST or EDT can achieve a higher secrecy rate based on the eavesdropper location relative to the transmitter and receiver in an 11 m × 5 m area.","PeriodicalId":6802,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secrecy Rate Comparison of Key-based Encrypted Data Transmission and Keyless Secure Transmission\",\"authors\":\"Ziyao Yu, Zijie Ji, Phee Lep Yeoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GCWkshps52748.2021.9682116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the secrecy rate of two general PHY security approaches of keyless secure transmission (ST) and key-based encrypted data transmission (EDT) in a multiple-input single-output, single eavesdropper (MISOSE) system. Specifically, closed-form approximations of the secrecy rate for both schemes are derived for the same coherence interval and under uncertain eavesdropper location. Our results highlight that the secrecy rate of ST is highly dependent on the propagation distance between the transmitter and the eavesdropper, whilst EDT is more impacted by the coherence interval and transmit power. Numerical simulations based on the IMT-2020 channel model are presented to support our analytical results. Our results clearly highlight different regions where ST or EDT can achieve a higher secrecy rate based on the eavesdropper location relative to the transmitter and receiver in an 11 m × 5 m area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GCWkshps52748.2021.9682116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GCWkshps52748.2021.9682116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文比较了在多输入单输出单窃听器(MISOSE)系统中无密钥安全传输(ST)和基于密钥的加密数据传输(EDT)两种常用PHY安全方式的保密率。具体地说,在窃听者位置不确定的情况下,导出了两种方案在相同相干间隔下的保密率的封闭近似。我们的研究结果表明,ST的保密率高度依赖于发射机和窃听者之间的传播距离,而EDT则更多地受到相干间隔和发射功率的影响。给出了基于IMT-2020信道模型的数值模拟来支持我们的分析结果。我们的研究结果清楚地强调了在11 m × 5 m区域内,基于窃听者相对于发射器和接收器的位置,ST或EDT可以实现更高保密率的不同区域。
Secrecy Rate Comparison of Key-based Encrypted Data Transmission and Keyless Secure Transmission
This paper compares the secrecy rate of two general PHY security approaches of keyless secure transmission (ST) and key-based encrypted data transmission (EDT) in a multiple-input single-output, single eavesdropper (MISOSE) system. Specifically, closed-form approximations of the secrecy rate for both schemes are derived for the same coherence interval and under uncertain eavesdropper location. Our results highlight that the secrecy rate of ST is highly dependent on the propagation distance between the transmitter and the eavesdropper, whilst EDT is more impacted by the coherence interval and transmit power. Numerical simulations based on the IMT-2020 channel model are presented to support our analytical results. Our results clearly highlight different regions where ST or EDT can achieve a higher secrecy rate based on the eavesdropper location relative to the transmitter and receiver in an 11 m × 5 m area.