基于直接模拟和机器学习技术的图像岩石物性估计研究综述

Ahmed S. Rizk, Moussa Tembely, W. Alameri, E. Al-Shalabi
{"title":"基于直接模拟和机器学习技术的图像岩石物性估计研究综述","authors":"Ahmed S. Rizk, Moussa Tembely, W. Alameri, E. Al-Shalabi","doi":"10.2118/208125-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Estimation of petrophysical properties is essential for accurate reservoir predictions. In recent years, extensive work has been dedicated into training different machine-learning (ML) models to predict petrophysical properties of digital rock using dry rock images along with data from single-phase direct simulations, such as lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and finite volume method (FVM). The objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive literature review on petrophysical properties estimation from dry rock images using different ML workflows and direct simulation methods. The review provides detailed comparison between different ML algorithms that have been used in the literature to estimate porosity, permeability, tortuosity, and effective diffusivity. In this paper, various ML workflows from the literature are screened and compared in terms of the training data set, the testing data set, the extracted features, the algorithms employed as well as their accuracy. A thorough description of the most commonly used algorithms is also provided to better understand the functionality of these algorithms to encode the relationship between the rock images and their respective petrophysical properties.\n The review of various ML workflows for estimating rock petrophysical properties from dry images shows that models trained using features extracted from the image (physics-informed models) outperformed models trained on the dry images directly. In addition, certain tree-based ML algorithms, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting can produce accurate predictions that are comparable to deep learning algorithms such as deep neural networks (DNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work dedicated to exploring and comparing between different ML frameworks that have recently been used to accurately and efficiently estimate rock petrophysical properties from images. This work will enable other researchers to have a broad understanding about the topic and help in developing new ML workflows or further modifying exiting ones in order to improve the characterization of rock properties. Also, this comparison represents a guide to understand the performance and applicability of different ML algorithms. Moreover, the review helps the researchers in this area to cope with digital innovations in porous media characterization in this fourth industrial age – oil and gas 4.0.","PeriodicalId":10959,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Literature Review on Rock Petrophysical Properties Estimation from Images Based on Direct Simulation and Machine Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed S. Rizk, Moussa Tembely, W. Alameri, E. Al-Shalabi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/208125-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Estimation of petrophysical properties is essential for accurate reservoir predictions. In recent years, extensive work has been dedicated into training different machine-learning (ML) models to predict petrophysical properties of digital rock using dry rock images along with data from single-phase direct simulations, such as lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and finite volume method (FVM). The objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive literature review on petrophysical properties estimation from dry rock images using different ML workflows and direct simulation methods. The review provides detailed comparison between different ML algorithms that have been used in the literature to estimate porosity, permeability, tortuosity, and effective diffusivity. In this paper, various ML workflows from the literature are screened and compared in terms of the training data set, the testing data set, the extracted features, the algorithms employed as well as their accuracy. A thorough description of the most commonly used algorithms is also provided to better understand the functionality of these algorithms to encode the relationship between the rock images and their respective petrophysical properties.\\n The review of various ML workflows for estimating rock petrophysical properties from dry images shows that models trained using features extracted from the image (physics-informed models) outperformed models trained on the dry images directly. In addition, certain tree-based ML algorithms, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting can produce accurate predictions that are comparable to deep learning algorithms such as deep neural networks (DNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work dedicated to exploring and comparing between different ML frameworks that have recently been used to accurately and efficiently estimate rock petrophysical properties from images. This work will enable other researchers to have a broad understanding about the topic and help in developing new ML workflows or further modifying exiting ones in order to improve the characterization of rock properties. Also, this comparison represents a guide to understand the performance and applicability of different ML algorithms. Moreover, the review helps the researchers in this area to cope with digital innovations in porous media characterization in this fourth industrial age – oil and gas 4.0.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/208125-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208125-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

岩石物性的估计是准确预测储层的关键。近年来,人们一直致力于训练不同的机器学习(ML)模型,利用干岩图像和单相直接模拟数据(如晶格玻尔兹曼方法(LBM)和有限体积法(FVM))来预测数字岩石的岩石物理性质。本文的目的是对使用不同ML工作流程和直接模拟方法从干岩图像中估计岩石物理性质进行全面的文献综述。这篇综述提供了文献中用于估计孔隙度、渗透率、弯曲度和有效扩散率的不同ML算法之间的详细比较。本文从训练数据集、测试数据集、提取的特征、采用的算法及其准确性等方面对文献中的各种ML工作流进行了筛选和比较。为了更好地理解这些算法对岩石图像及其各自岩石物理性质之间的关系进行编码的功能,还提供了最常用算法的详细描述。对从干图像中估计岩石物理性质的各种ML工作流程的回顾表明,使用从图像中提取的特征(物理信息模型)训练的模型优于直接在干图像上训练的模型。此外,某些基于树的机器学习算法,如随机森林、梯度增强和极端梯度增强,可以产生与深度神经网络(dnn)和卷积神经网络(cnn)等深度学习算法相当的准确预测。据我们所知,这是第一个致力于探索和比较不同ML框架的工作,这些框架最近被用于准确有效地从图像中估计岩石物理性质。这项工作将使其他研究人员对该主题有更广泛的了解,并有助于开发新的机器学习工作流程或进一步修改现有工作流程,以改善岩石性质的表征。此外,这种比较代表了理解不同ML算法的性能和适用性的指南。此外,该综述还有助于该领域的研究人员应对第四次工业时代(石油和天然气4.0)中多孔介质表征的数字创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Literature Review on Rock Petrophysical Properties Estimation from Images Based on Direct Simulation and Machine Learning Techniques
Estimation of petrophysical properties is essential for accurate reservoir predictions. In recent years, extensive work has been dedicated into training different machine-learning (ML) models to predict petrophysical properties of digital rock using dry rock images along with data from single-phase direct simulations, such as lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and finite volume method (FVM). The objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive literature review on petrophysical properties estimation from dry rock images using different ML workflows and direct simulation methods. The review provides detailed comparison between different ML algorithms that have been used in the literature to estimate porosity, permeability, tortuosity, and effective diffusivity. In this paper, various ML workflows from the literature are screened and compared in terms of the training data set, the testing data set, the extracted features, the algorithms employed as well as their accuracy. A thorough description of the most commonly used algorithms is also provided to better understand the functionality of these algorithms to encode the relationship between the rock images and their respective petrophysical properties. The review of various ML workflows for estimating rock petrophysical properties from dry images shows that models trained using features extracted from the image (physics-informed models) outperformed models trained on the dry images directly. In addition, certain tree-based ML algorithms, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting can produce accurate predictions that are comparable to deep learning algorithms such as deep neural networks (DNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work dedicated to exploring and comparing between different ML frameworks that have recently been used to accurately and efficiently estimate rock petrophysical properties from images. This work will enable other researchers to have a broad understanding about the topic and help in developing new ML workflows or further modifying exiting ones in order to improve the characterization of rock properties. Also, this comparison represents a guide to understand the performance and applicability of different ML algorithms. Moreover, the review helps the researchers in this area to cope with digital innovations in porous media characterization in this fourth industrial age – oil and gas 4.0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信