绿色债券融资的下一步

Dion Bongaerts, D. Schoenmaker
{"title":"绿色债券融资的下一步","authors":"Dion Bongaerts, D. Schoenmaker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3389762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, green bonds have gained popularity as the investment industry is looking for environmentally friendly instruments. Yet, green bonds fragment bond issues, which reduces liquidity and thereby increases financing costs. Moreover, most green bonds are used to refinance existing activities. As a result, the growth in environmentally-friendly initiatives is limited. Finally, the product and market design of green bonds is such that prices are unlikely to reflect environmental performance accurately. This makes it hard for investors to differentiate among green bonds and allows firms to get away with window-dressing (greenwashing). We propose to split green bonds into regular bonds and green certificates. We show that this design 1. makes market prices more informative about environmental performance, 2. leads to more liquid securities and therefore lower financing costs, and 3. provides incentives to start new environmentally friendly projects rather than refinance existing ones.","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"10 41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Next Step in Green Bond Financing\",\"authors\":\"Dion Bongaerts, D. Schoenmaker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3389762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, green bonds have gained popularity as the investment industry is looking for environmentally friendly instruments. Yet, green bonds fragment bond issues, which reduces liquidity and thereby increases financing costs. Moreover, most green bonds are used to refinance existing activities. As a result, the growth in environmentally-friendly initiatives is limited. Finally, the product and market design of green bonds is such that prices are unlikely to reflect environmental performance accurately. This makes it hard for investors to differentiate among green bonds and allows firms to get away with window-dressing (greenwashing). We propose to split green bonds into regular bonds and green certificates. We show that this design 1. makes market prices more informative about environmental performance, 2. leads to more liquid securities and therefore lower financing costs, and 3. provides incentives to start new environmentally friendly projects rather than refinance existing ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"10 41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3389762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3389762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来,随着投资行业寻找环保工具,绿色债券越来越受欢迎。然而,绿色债券分散了债券发行,降低了流动性,从而增加了融资成本。此外,大多数绿色债券用于为现有活动再融资。因此,环保举措的增长是有限的。最后,绿色债券的产品和市场设计使得价格不太可能准确反映环境绩效。这使得投资者很难区分不同的绿色债券,并允许公司逃避粉饰账目(漂绿)。我们建议将绿色债券分为普通债券和绿色证书。我们展示了这个设计。使市场价格更能反映环境绩效;2 .使证券更具流动性,从而降低融资成本;鼓励开展新的环保项目,而不是为现有项目再融资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Next Step in Green Bond Financing
In recent years, green bonds have gained popularity as the investment industry is looking for environmentally friendly instruments. Yet, green bonds fragment bond issues, which reduces liquidity and thereby increases financing costs. Moreover, most green bonds are used to refinance existing activities. As a result, the growth in environmentally-friendly initiatives is limited. Finally, the product and market design of green bonds is such that prices are unlikely to reflect environmental performance accurately. This makes it hard for investors to differentiate among green bonds and allows firms to get away with window-dressing (greenwashing). We propose to split green bonds into regular bonds and green certificates. We show that this design 1. makes market prices more informative about environmental performance, 2. leads to more liquid securities and therefore lower financing costs, and 3. provides incentives to start new environmentally friendly projects rather than refinance existing ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信