酒精滥用者的治疗结果评价方法:优势和关键问题

Linda C Sobell, Mark B Sobell
{"title":"酒精滥用者的治疗结果评价方法:优势和关键问题","authors":"Linda C Sobell,&nbsp;Mark B Sobell","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90019-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper addresses selected methodological issues related to treatment outcome studies in the alcohol field. In particular, an assessment is presented of where treatment evaluation methodology has excelled (strengths) and where weaknesses are apparent (key issues facing the field today). The four strengths discussed are (1) precision of measurement of the target behavior—drinking; (2) research on the veridicality of self-reports; (3) length of the follow-up interval; and (4) development of a convergent validity criterion approach to assessment and evaluation. The three key issues reviewed are: (1) How should treatment success be gauged? (2) What is an adequate follow-up interval upon which to base conclusions about treatment success or failure? (3) Can the validity of self-reports be enhanced?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 151-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90019-2","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcome evaluation methodology with alcohol abusers: strengths and key issues\",\"authors\":\"Linda C Sobell,&nbsp;Mark B Sobell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90019-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper addresses selected methodological issues related to treatment outcome studies in the alcohol field. In particular, an assessment is presented of where treatment evaluation methodology has excelled (strengths) and where weaknesses are apparent (key issues facing the field today). The four strengths discussed are (1) precision of measurement of the target behavior—drinking; (2) research on the veridicality of self-reports; (3) length of the follow-up interval; and (4) development of a convergent validity criterion approach to assessment and evaluation. The three key issues reviewed are: (1) How should treatment success be gauged? (2) What is an adequate follow-up interval upon which to base conclusions about treatment success or failure? (3) Can the validity of self-reports be enhanced?</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 151-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90019-2\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文讨论了与酒精领域治疗结果研究相关的方法学问题。特别是,对治疗评估方法的优势(优势)和弱点(当今该领域面临的关键问题)进行了评估。讨论的四个优势是:(1)目标行为-饮酒的测量精度;(2)自我报告的真实性研究;(3)随访间隔时间长短;(4)提出了一种收敛效度准则的评价方法。审查的三个关键问题是:(1)如何衡量治疗成功?(2)什么是适当的随访间隔,以此为基础得出治疗成功或失败的结论?(3)自我报告的效度是否可以提高?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment outcome evaluation methodology with alcohol abusers: strengths and key issues

This paper addresses selected methodological issues related to treatment outcome studies in the alcohol field. In particular, an assessment is presented of where treatment evaluation methodology has excelled (strengths) and where weaknesses are apparent (key issues facing the field today). The four strengths discussed are (1) precision of measurement of the target behavior—drinking; (2) research on the veridicality of self-reports; (3) length of the follow-up interval; and (4) development of a convergent validity criterion approach to assessment and evaluation. The three key issues reviewed are: (1) How should treatment success be gauged? (2) What is an adequate follow-up interval upon which to base conclusions about treatment success or failure? (3) Can the validity of self-reports be enhanced?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信