HS-SPME和PoraPak-Q气味捕捉法测定牛瘤胃代谢产物挥发性有机物的比较研究

Victor O. Omondi, Geoffrey O. Bosire, J. Onyari, M. N. Getahun
{"title":"HS-SPME和PoraPak-Q气味捕捉法测定牛瘤胃代谢产物挥发性有机物的比较研究","authors":"Victor O. Omondi, Geoffrey O. Bosire, J. Onyari, M. N. Getahun","doi":"10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the rapidly increasing field of metabolomic research, fast and accurate trapping of volatile odor compounds from biological samples is critical. Here a comparative evaluation of HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q adsorbent odor trapping methods followed by GC-MS analysis were used to determine volatile compounds in cattle rumen. Compared to the PoraPak-Q adsorbent, the HS-SPME method was more effective in trapping diverse metabolites including low molecular weight and highly volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, acetic and butyric acid. Additionally, using the HS-SPME method, shorter trapping times were achieved (30 minutes) whilst the PoraPak-Q adsorbent required longer time extending beyond 1 hour for effective volatile trapping. In the context of metabolomics analysis from biological samples, the two different methods vary in determination of chemo-diversities, qualitatively and abundance of shared odor, and time required to trap odors, which are critical in such studies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":7793,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","volume":"21 1","pages":"451 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Investigation of Volatile Organic Compounds of Cattle Rumen Metabolites using HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q Odor Trapping Methods\",\"authors\":\"Victor O. Omondi, Geoffrey O. Bosire, J. Onyari, M. N. Getahun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the rapidly increasing field of metabolomic research, fast and accurate trapping of volatile odor compounds from biological samples is critical. Here a comparative evaluation of HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q adsorbent odor trapping methods followed by GC-MS analysis were used to determine volatile compounds in cattle rumen. Compared to the PoraPak-Q adsorbent, the HS-SPME method was more effective in trapping diverse metabolites including low molecular weight and highly volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, acetic and butyric acid. Additionally, using the HS-SPME method, shorter trapping times were achieved (30 minutes) whilst the PoraPak-Q adsorbent required longer time extending beyond 1 hour for effective volatile trapping. In the context of metabolomics analysis from biological samples, the two different methods vary in determination of chemo-diversities, qualitatively and abundance of shared odor, and time required to trap odors, which are critical in such studies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":7793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry Letters\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"451 - 459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2022.2100276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在快速发展的代谢组学研究领域,快速准确地捕获生物样品中的挥发性气味化合物至关重要。本文采用HS-SPME和PoraPak-Q吸附剂气味捕获法进行对比评价,然后采用气相色谱-质谱分析测定牛瘤胃中挥发性化合物。与PoraPak-Q吸附剂相比,HS-SPME方法在捕获各种代谢物(包括低分子量和高挥发性化合物,如二氧化碳、乙酸和丁酸)方面更有效。此外,使用HS-SPME方法,捕获时间更短(30分钟),而PoraPak-Q吸附剂需要更长时间(超过1小时)才能有效捕获挥发物。在生物样本代谢组学分析的背景下,这两种不同的方法在确定化学多样性、质量和共享气味的丰度以及捕获气味所需的时间方面存在差异,这在此类研究中至关重要。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Investigation of Volatile Organic Compounds of Cattle Rumen Metabolites using HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q Odor Trapping Methods
Abstract In the rapidly increasing field of metabolomic research, fast and accurate trapping of volatile odor compounds from biological samples is critical. Here a comparative evaluation of HS-SPME and PoraPak-Q adsorbent odor trapping methods followed by GC-MS analysis were used to determine volatile compounds in cattle rumen. Compared to the PoraPak-Q adsorbent, the HS-SPME method was more effective in trapping diverse metabolites including low molecular weight and highly volatile compounds such as carbon dioxide, acetic and butyric acid. Additionally, using the HS-SPME method, shorter trapping times were achieved (30 minutes) whilst the PoraPak-Q adsorbent required longer time extending beyond 1 hour for effective volatile trapping. In the context of metabolomics analysis from biological samples, the two different methods vary in determination of chemo-diversities, qualitatively and abundance of shared odor, and time required to trap odors, which are critical in such studies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信