{"title":"在埃斯特·塞姆的《另一个印度人致印度其余部分》一书中,次国家话语作为反想象:走向邦联政治假设","authors":"Muthukumar Manickam, Vinod Balakrishnan","doi":"10.1353/pan.2020.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper posits that Esther Syiem's poem, \"To the Rest of India from Another Indian\" (2013) engenders a subnational discourse that, by interrogating the national status of a privileged pedagogy, opts for a confederal political imagination of multiple and equal centers. It fosters this desire by modulating a counter imagination in two strategic ways—foregroundong its strangeness and implanting its own subnational pedagogy which constitutes its imagination. The subnational discourse, then, homogenizes the national imagination, and sets it in binary opposition to the modulated counter imagination which is also homogenized. It proceeds, after setting up a binary opposition, to contradict, delimit, and alienate itself in order to be recognized as another authentic and central entity parallel to the pedagogy that is deemed to be national. This paper concludes that Syiem's subnational discourse, considered as a form of minority discourse, goes against the grain of Homi K. Bhabha's view of minority discourse.","PeriodicalId":42435,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":"17 1","pages":"149 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subnational Discourse as Counter Imagination in Esther Syiem's \\\"To the Rest of India from Another Indian\\\": Towards a Confederal Political Assumption\",\"authors\":\"Muthukumar Manickam, Vinod Balakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pan.2020.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper posits that Esther Syiem's poem, \\\"To the Rest of India from Another Indian\\\" (2013) engenders a subnational discourse that, by interrogating the national status of a privileged pedagogy, opts for a confederal political imagination of multiple and equal centers. It fosters this desire by modulating a counter imagination in two strategic ways—foregroundong its strangeness and implanting its own subnational pedagogy which constitutes its imagination. The subnational discourse, then, homogenizes the national imagination, and sets it in binary opposition to the modulated counter imagination which is also homogenized. It proceeds, after setting up a binary opposition, to contradict, delimit, and alienate itself in order to be recognized as another authentic and central entity parallel to the pedagogy that is deemed to be national. This paper concludes that Syiem's subnational discourse, considered as a form of minority discourse, goes against the grain of Homi K. Bhabha's view of minority discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2020.0007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers-Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2020.0007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文认为,Esther Syiem的诗歌《从另一个印度人致印度其他地区》(2013)引发了一种次国家话语,通过质疑特权教育学的国家地位,选择了多元和平等中心的邦联制政治想象。它通过两种战略方式调节反想象力来促进这种愿望——突出其陌生性和植入自己的次国家教育方法,这构成了它的想象力。于是,次国家话语将国家想象同质化,并将其与同样被同质化的调制反想象二元对立。在建立了二元对立之后,它继续自我矛盾、界定和异化,以便被认为是与被认为是民族的教育学平行的另一个真实的中心实体。本文的结论是,Syiem的次民族话语作为少数民族话语的一种形式,与Homi K. Bhabha的少数民族话语观背道而驰。
Subnational Discourse as Counter Imagination in Esther Syiem's "To the Rest of India from Another Indian": Towards a Confederal Political Assumption
Abstract:This paper posits that Esther Syiem's poem, "To the Rest of India from Another Indian" (2013) engenders a subnational discourse that, by interrogating the national status of a privileged pedagogy, opts for a confederal political imagination of multiple and equal centers. It fosters this desire by modulating a counter imagination in two strategic ways—foregroundong its strangeness and implanting its own subnational pedagogy which constitutes its imagination. The subnational discourse, then, homogenizes the national imagination, and sets it in binary opposition to the modulated counter imagination which is also homogenized. It proceeds, after setting up a binary opposition, to contradict, delimit, and alienate itself in order to be recognized as another authentic and central entity parallel to the pedagogy that is deemed to be national. This paper concludes that Syiem's subnational discourse, considered as a form of minority discourse, goes against the grain of Homi K. Bhabha's view of minority discourse.
期刊介绍:
Partial Answers is an international, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the study of literature and the history of ideas. This interdisciplinary component is responsible for combining analysis of literary works with discussions of historical and theoretical issues. The journal publishes articles on various national literatures including Anglophone, Hebrew, Yiddish, German, Russian, and, predominately, English literature. Partial Answers would appeal to literature scholars, teachers, and students in addition to scholars in philosophy, cultural studies, and intellectual history.