法律是如何实施的?基于中国一个司法案例的社会学分析

Jialiang Huang
{"title":"法律是如何实施的?基于中国一个司法案例的社会学分析","authors":"Jialiang Huang","doi":"10.2753/CSA0009-4625410202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The argument over formalism and instrumentalism has always been a major issue in Western jurisprudence (Bourdieu 2002). They are the two fundamental perspectives from which the law is studied in academic circles. In formalist jurisprudence, the law is deemed to be a fully independent and autonomous system whose development can be understood only through its “intrinsic power”; legal philosophies and legal conduct have absolute independence and are never determined by social factors. Representative of this philosophy is the analytical positivist jurisprudence school that came into being in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Adherents “try to separate values from the scope of jurisprudent research and restrict the tasks of jurisprudence to the analysis and anatomy of actual law” (Bodenheimer 1999, 116) and mainly focus on attempts to “analyze legal terms and study the interrelationships between legal propositions in terms of logic” (Stone 1961, 31). As John Austin believed, jurisprudence is an independent and self-contained theory about actual law and “what it is concerned","PeriodicalId":84447,"journal":{"name":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","volume":"111 1","pages":"41 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Are Laws Practiced? A Sociological Analysis Based on a Judicial Case in China\",\"authors\":\"Jialiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/CSA0009-4625410202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The argument over formalism and instrumentalism has always been a major issue in Western jurisprudence (Bourdieu 2002). They are the two fundamental perspectives from which the law is studied in academic circles. In formalist jurisprudence, the law is deemed to be a fully independent and autonomous system whose development can be understood only through its “intrinsic power”; legal philosophies and legal conduct have absolute independence and are never determined by social factors. Representative of this philosophy is the analytical positivist jurisprudence school that came into being in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Adherents “try to separate values from the scope of jurisprudent research and restrict the tasks of jurisprudence to the analysis and anatomy of actual law” (Bodenheimer 1999, 116) and mainly focus on attempts to “analyze legal terms and study the interrelationships between legal propositions in terms of logic” (Stone 1961, 31). As John Austin believed, jurisprudence is an independent and self-contained theory about actual law and “what it is concerned\",\"PeriodicalId\":84447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625410202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625410202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于形式主义和工具主义的争论一直是西方法理学的一个主要问题(Bourdieu 2002)。它们是学术界研究法律的两个基本视角。在形式主义法理学中,法律被认为是一个完全独立自主的系统,其发展只能通过其“内在力量”来理解;法律理念和法律行为具有绝对的独立性,不受社会因素的制约。这种哲学的代表是19世纪下半叶形成的分析实证主义法学学派。支持者“试图将价值从法理学研究的范围中分离出来,并将法理学的任务限制在对实际法律的分析和剖析中”(Bodenheimer 1999, 116),主要集中在试图“从逻辑的角度分析法律术语和研究法律命题之间的相互关系”(Stone 1961, 31)。正如约翰·奥斯汀(John Austin)所认为的那样,法学是一种关于实际法律及其“所涉之事”的独立而自成体系的理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Are Laws Practiced? A Sociological Analysis Based on a Judicial Case in China
The argument over formalism and instrumentalism has always been a major issue in Western jurisprudence (Bourdieu 2002). They are the two fundamental perspectives from which the law is studied in academic circles. In formalist jurisprudence, the law is deemed to be a fully independent and autonomous system whose development can be understood only through its “intrinsic power”; legal philosophies and legal conduct have absolute independence and are never determined by social factors. Representative of this philosophy is the analytical positivist jurisprudence school that came into being in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Adherents “try to separate values from the scope of jurisprudent research and restrict the tasks of jurisprudence to the analysis and anatomy of actual law” (Bodenheimer 1999, 116) and mainly focus on attempts to “analyze legal terms and study the interrelationships between legal propositions in terms of logic” (Stone 1961, 31). As John Austin believed, jurisprudence is an independent and self-contained theory about actual law and “what it is concerned
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信