统觉测试上帝表征的验证,一种评估上帝表征的隐式测量。第三部分:上帝表征的内隐和外显测量与自我报告的人格功能水平之间的联系

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
H. P. Stulp, J. Koelen, G. Glas, Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe
{"title":"统觉测试上帝表征的验证,一种评估上帝表征的隐式测量。第三部分:上帝表征的内隐和外显测量与自我报告的人格功能水平之间的联系","authors":"H. P. Stulp, J. Koelen, G. Glas, Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe","doi":"10.1080/19349637.2019.1700475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research with self-report measures of God representations suggests an association with personality pathology. However, according to object-relations theory, God representations are predominantly implicit. This observational study aimed at validating the implicit Apperception Test God Representations (ATGR). In a group of 74 patients with personality pathology and a group of 71 non-patients, correlations of measures of self-reported personality functioning with the implicit ATGR were compared with correlations with the explicit Questionnaire God Representations (QGR). Only in the clinical group, results corroborated the validity of three ATGR main scales by showing significant correlations with mostly nearly medium effect sizes.","PeriodicalId":51916,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"197 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the apperception test God representations, an implicit measure to assess God representations. Part 3: associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and self-reported level of personality functioning\",\"authors\":\"H. P. Stulp, J. Koelen, G. Glas, Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19349637.2019.1700475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Research with self-report measures of God representations suggests an association with personality pathology. However, according to object-relations theory, God representations are predominantly implicit. This observational study aimed at validating the implicit Apperception Test God Representations (ATGR). In a group of 74 patients with personality pathology and a group of 71 non-patients, correlations of measures of self-reported personality functioning with the implicit ATGR were compared with correlations with the explicit Questionnaire God Representations (QGR). Only in the clinical group, results corroborated the validity of three ATGR main scales by showing significant correlations with mostly nearly medium effect sizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2019.1700475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2019.1700475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究自我报告测量的上帝表征表明与人格病理学的关联。然而,根据客体关系理论,上帝表征主要是隐式的。本观察性研究旨在验证内隐统觉测验“上帝表征”(ATGR)。在74名人格病理患者和71名非患者中,比较了自我报告人格功能测量与内隐ATGR的相关性以及与外显问卷上帝表征(QGR)的相关性。只有在临床组,结果证实了三个ATGR主量表的有效性,显示出显著的相关性,大多数效应量接近中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the apperception test God representations, an implicit measure to assess God representations. Part 3: associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and self-reported level of personality functioning
ABSTRACT Research with self-report measures of God representations suggests an association with personality pathology. However, according to object-relations theory, God representations are predominantly implicit. This observational study aimed at validating the implicit Apperception Test God Representations (ATGR). In a group of 74 patients with personality pathology and a group of 71 non-patients, correlations of measures of self-reported personality functioning with the implicit ATGR were compared with correlations with the explicit Questionnaire God Representations (QGR). Only in the clinical group, results corroborated the validity of three ATGR main scales by showing significant correlations with mostly nearly medium effect sizes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health is an interdisciplinary professional journal (retiled from American Journal of Pastoral Counseling to better reflect its broader scope) that is devoted to the scholarly study of spirituality as a resource for counseling and psychotherapeutic disciplines. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal seeks to enhance the understanding of spirituality as a core component of human well-being in individual, relational, and communal life. Leading authorities provide insights into research and effective therapy in an interdisciplinary dialog that crosses the disciplines of psychology, spirituality, theology, sociology, cultural analysis, and other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信