{"title":"时代的成因:《层叠文集》8.22.1-4的注释","authors":"Máté Veres","doi":"10.1515/9783110618839-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The majority of the excerpts traditionally taken to derive from a planned book 8 of Clement of Alexandria’s Stromateis concern the theory of demonstration (apodeixis) and related matters of logic. The suspension of judgement (epochē), a recognisably sceptical response to disagreement and a lack of demonstrative certainty, receives two brief treatments in this context. Apart from an attempted refutation of scepticism which points to the allegedly self-refuting character of universal epochē (5.15.2–16.3), the text also includes an account of the causes that lead one to suspend judgement (7.22.1–4). The source of this treatment of scepticism is unknown.2 In his recent edition, translation, and commentary, Matyáš Havrda gives a judicious overview of the scholarly proposals and argues that a liber logicus, perhaps Galen’s lost work On Demonstration (De Demonstratione or Peri Apodeixeōs), could have been the direct or indirect source of parts or the whole of the alleged book 8.3 At the same time, Havrda is not convinced that this material ever made it into a Clementine book. In his view, it is","PeriodicalId":93772,"journal":{"name":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Causes of Epochē: A Note on Stromateis 8.22.1–4\",\"authors\":\"Máté Veres\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110618839-006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The majority of the excerpts traditionally taken to derive from a planned book 8 of Clement of Alexandria’s Stromateis concern the theory of demonstration (apodeixis) and related matters of logic. The suspension of judgement (epochē), a recognisably sceptical response to disagreement and a lack of demonstrative certainty, receives two brief treatments in this context. Apart from an attempted refutation of scepticism which points to the allegedly self-refuting character of universal epochē (5.15.2–16.3), the text also includes an account of the causes that lead one to suspend judgement (7.22.1–4). The source of this treatment of scepticism is unknown.2 In his recent edition, translation, and commentary, Matyáš Havrda gives a judicious overview of the scholarly proposals and argues that a liber logicus, perhaps Galen’s lost work On Demonstration (De Demonstratione or Peri Apodeixeōs), could have been the direct or indirect source of parts or the whole of the alleged book 8.3 At the same time, Havrda is not convinced that this material ever made it into a Clementine book. In his view, it is\",\"PeriodicalId\":93772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839-006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISOEN 2019 : 18th International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose : 2019 symposium proceedings : ACROS Fukuoka, May 26-29, 2019. International Symposium on Olfaction and the Electronic Nose (18th : 2019 : Fukuoka-shi, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110618839-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大部分的节选传统上是从亚历山大的克莱门特的《论文集》第8卷中摘录的,涉及论证理论(apodeixis)和相关的逻辑问题。暂停判断(epoch)是对分歧和缺乏证明性确定性的明显怀疑反应,在此背景下接受了两种简短的处理。除了试图反驳怀疑主义,指出普遍时代的所谓自我反驳的性质(5.15.2-16.3)外,文本还包括导致人们暂停判断的原因(7.22.1-4)的叙述。这种对待怀疑主义的方式的来源是未知的在他最近的版本、翻译和评论中,Matyáš Havrda对学术建议给出了一个审慎的概述,并认为一个逻辑著作,也许是盖伦丢失的著作《论论证》(De Demonstration or Peri Apodeixeōs),可能是部分或全部所谓的书的直接或间接来源。8.3与此同时,Havrda不相信这些材料曾经成为克莱门蒂的书。在他看来,确实如此
The Causes of Epochē: A Note on Stromateis 8.22.1–4
The majority of the excerpts traditionally taken to derive from a planned book 8 of Clement of Alexandria’s Stromateis concern the theory of demonstration (apodeixis) and related matters of logic. The suspension of judgement (epochē), a recognisably sceptical response to disagreement and a lack of demonstrative certainty, receives two brief treatments in this context. Apart from an attempted refutation of scepticism which points to the allegedly self-refuting character of universal epochē (5.15.2–16.3), the text also includes an account of the causes that lead one to suspend judgement (7.22.1–4). The source of this treatment of scepticism is unknown.2 In his recent edition, translation, and commentary, Matyáš Havrda gives a judicious overview of the scholarly proposals and argues that a liber logicus, perhaps Galen’s lost work On Demonstration (De Demonstratione or Peri Apodeixeōs), could have been the direct or indirect source of parts or the whole of the alleged book 8.3 At the same time, Havrda is not convinced that this material ever made it into a Clementine book. In his view, it is