{"title":"人脸识别算法性能的比较研究","authors":"Truong Van Nguyen, Tuan Duc Chu","doi":"10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial and object recognition are more and more applied in our life. Therefore, this field has become important to both academicians and practitioners. Face recognition systems are complex systems using features of the face to recognize. Current face recognition systems may be used to increase work efficiency in various methods, including smart homes, online banking, traffic, sports, robots, and others. With various applications like this, the number of facial recognition methods has been increasing in recent years. However, the performance of face recognition systems can be significantly affected by various factors such as lighting conditions, and different types of masks (sunglasses, scarves, hats, etc.). In this paper, a detailed comparison between face recognition techniques is exposed by listing the structure of each model, the advantages and disadvantages as well as performing experiments to demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and complexity of each algorithm. To be detailed, let’s give a performance comparison of three methods for measuring the efficacy of face recognition systems including a support vector machine (SVM), a visual geometry group with 16 layers (VGG-16), and a residual network with 50 layers (ResNet-50) in real-life settings. The efficiency of algorithms is evaluated in various environments such as normal light indoors, backlit indoors, low light indoors, natural light outdoors, and backlit outdoors. In addition, this paper also evaluates faces with hats and glasses to examine the accuracy of the methods. The experimental results indicate that the ResNet-50 has the highest accuracy to identify faces. The time to recognize is ranging from 1.1s to 1.2s in the normal environment","PeriodicalId":11804,"journal":{"name":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study on the performance of face recognition algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Truong Van Nguyen, Tuan Duc Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Facial and object recognition are more and more applied in our life. Therefore, this field has become important to both academicians and practitioners. Face recognition systems are complex systems using features of the face to recognize. Current face recognition systems may be used to increase work efficiency in various methods, including smart homes, online banking, traffic, sports, robots, and others. With various applications like this, the number of facial recognition methods has been increasing in recent years. However, the performance of face recognition systems can be significantly affected by various factors such as lighting conditions, and different types of masks (sunglasses, scarves, hats, etc.). In this paper, a detailed comparison between face recognition techniques is exposed by listing the structure of each model, the advantages and disadvantages as well as performing experiments to demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and complexity of each algorithm. To be detailed, let’s give a performance comparison of three methods for measuring the efficacy of face recognition systems including a support vector machine (SVM), a visual geometry group with 16 layers (VGG-16), and a residual network with 50 layers (ResNet-50) in real-life settings. The efficiency of algorithms is evaluated in various environments such as normal light indoors, backlit indoors, low light indoors, natural light outdoors, and backlit outdoors. In addition, this paper also evaluates faces with hats and glasses to examine the accuracy of the methods. The experimental results indicate that the ResNet-50 has the highest accuracy to identify faces. The time to recognize is ranging from 1.1s to 1.2s in the normal environment\",\"PeriodicalId\":11804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUREKA: Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2023.002831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study on the performance of face recognition algorithms
Facial and object recognition are more and more applied in our life. Therefore, this field has become important to both academicians and practitioners. Face recognition systems are complex systems using features of the face to recognize. Current face recognition systems may be used to increase work efficiency in various methods, including smart homes, online banking, traffic, sports, robots, and others. With various applications like this, the number of facial recognition methods has been increasing in recent years. However, the performance of face recognition systems can be significantly affected by various factors such as lighting conditions, and different types of masks (sunglasses, scarves, hats, etc.). In this paper, a detailed comparison between face recognition techniques is exposed by listing the structure of each model, the advantages and disadvantages as well as performing experiments to demonstrate the robustness, accuracy, and complexity of each algorithm. To be detailed, let’s give a performance comparison of three methods for measuring the efficacy of face recognition systems including a support vector machine (SVM), a visual geometry group with 16 layers (VGG-16), and a residual network with 50 layers (ResNet-50) in real-life settings. The efficiency of algorithms is evaluated in various environments such as normal light indoors, backlit indoors, low light indoors, natural light outdoors, and backlit outdoors. In addition, this paper also evaluates faces with hats and glasses to examine the accuracy of the methods. The experimental results indicate that the ResNet-50 has the highest accuracy to identify faces. The time to recognize is ranging from 1.1s to 1.2s in the normal environment