质疑印度的发展轨迹:给尼日利亚的教训

Christopher Barisi Barigbon, Kaabe Kpaa
{"title":"质疑印度的发展轨迹:给尼日利亚的教训","authors":"Christopher Barisi Barigbon, Kaabe Kpaa","doi":"10.31039/jgeb.v3i11.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a backward agriculture dominated economy, India jumped straight within a short-while (after four decades of diverse experiment with the socialist model) into an economic structure lead by service and high-end manufacturing sector. Its development model is principally driven by the rapid expansion of the high-end knowledge- intensive sector. This is otherwise known as the knowledge economy. We attempt to unveil the path to the knowledge economy. To do the explanation, we adopt neo-liberalism as our theoretical guide. Our method is historical, descriptive, and analytical .Data are basically collected from secondary sources. A careful analysis of the Indian model of development show: paradox of a flailing state; a neglect of the low-end labour- intensive sector such as manufacturing and agriculture, a growing inequality despite the quantum leap in GDP, This call for a more inclusive development model that will be a sustainable model for a pluralistic society such as India.","PeriodicalId":32548,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Economics and Business","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogating the Indian Development trajectories: Lessons for Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Barisi Barigbon, Kaabe Kpaa\",\"doi\":\"10.31039/jgeb.v3i11.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From a backward agriculture dominated economy, India jumped straight within a short-while (after four decades of diverse experiment with the socialist model) into an economic structure lead by service and high-end manufacturing sector. Its development model is principally driven by the rapid expansion of the high-end knowledge- intensive sector. This is otherwise known as the knowledge economy. We attempt to unveil the path to the knowledge economy. To do the explanation, we adopt neo-liberalism as our theoretical guide. Our method is historical, descriptive, and analytical .Data are basically collected from secondary sources. A careful analysis of the Indian model of development show: paradox of a flailing state; a neglect of the low-end labour- intensive sector such as manufacturing and agriculture, a growing inequality despite the quantum leap in GDP, This call for a more inclusive development model that will be a sustainable model for a pluralistic society such as India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Economics and Business\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Economics and Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31039/jgeb.v3i11.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Economics and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31039/jgeb.v3i11.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从一个落后的农业主导的经济,印度在短时间内(经过40年对社会主义模式的多样化试验)直接跃升为一个以服务业和高端制造业为主导的经济结构。它的发展模式主要是由高端知识密集型产业的快速扩张所驱动的。这就是所谓的知识经济。我们试图揭示通往知识经济的道路。为了进行解释,我们以新自由主义为理论指导。我们的方法是历史性的、描述性的和分析性的。数据基本上是从二手来源收集的。对印度发展模式的仔细分析表明:一个摇摇欲坠的国家的悖论;对制造业和农业等低端劳动密集型行业的忽视,尽管国内生产总值(GDP)出现了巨大飞跃,但不平等现象仍在加剧,这就需要一种更具包容性的发展模式,这种模式将成为印度等多元化社会的可持续模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrogating the Indian Development trajectories: Lessons for Nigeria
From a backward agriculture dominated economy, India jumped straight within a short-while (after four decades of diverse experiment with the socialist model) into an economic structure lead by service and high-end manufacturing sector. Its development model is principally driven by the rapid expansion of the high-end knowledge- intensive sector. This is otherwise known as the knowledge economy. We attempt to unveil the path to the knowledge economy. To do the explanation, we adopt neo-liberalism as our theoretical guide. Our method is historical, descriptive, and analytical .Data are basically collected from secondary sources. A careful analysis of the Indian model of development show: paradox of a flailing state; a neglect of the low-end labour- intensive sector such as manufacturing and agriculture, a growing inequality despite the quantum leap in GDP, This call for a more inclusive development model that will be a sustainable model for a pluralistic society such as India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信