采用大众生产方法的最佳电子货币服务支持决策系统

Melati Wasti, Sari Hartini, R. Rinawati
{"title":"采用大众生产方法的最佳电子货币服务支持决策系统","authors":"Melati Wasti, Sari Hartini, R. Rinawati","doi":"10.30736/jt.v11i2.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was conducted to assist users in choosing the best electronic money. Where electronic money is easier to use than conventional money. By using five criteria, namely: convenience, security, promotion, speed, and convenience. This research was conducted on electronic money users in the city of Bekasi with a population of 3,013,851 people using a sample of 44 respondents. The method used is the weighted product method. The results of this study indicate that the first alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by OVO has a value of 0.391 with very positive criteria, namely convenience value (K1) = 206, security (K2) = 204, promotion (K3) = 169, speed (K4 ) = 203, convenience (K5) = 183. The second alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by Go-Pay has a value of 0.359 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 182, security (K2) = 168, promotion (K3 ) = 166, speed (K4) = 183, comfort (K5) = 180. The third alternative recommendation for electronic money obtained by Dana has a value of 0.227 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 115, security (K2) = 126, promotion (K3) = 117 speed (K4) = 124, comfort (K5) = 111.","PeriodicalId":17707,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Qua Teknika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTASI METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN LAYANAN UANG ELEKTRONIK TERBAIK\",\"authors\":\"Melati Wasti, Sari Hartini, R. Rinawati\",\"doi\":\"10.30736/jt.v11i2.345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research was conducted to assist users in choosing the best electronic money. Where electronic money is easier to use than conventional money. By using five criteria, namely: convenience, security, promotion, speed, and convenience. This research was conducted on electronic money users in the city of Bekasi with a population of 3,013,851 people using a sample of 44 respondents. The method used is the weighted product method. The results of this study indicate that the first alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by OVO has a value of 0.391 with very positive criteria, namely convenience value (K1) = 206, security (K2) = 204, promotion (K3) = 169, speed (K4 ) = 203, convenience (K5) = 183. The second alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by Go-Pay has a value of 0.359 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 182, security (K2) = 168, promotion (K3 ) = 166, speed (K4) = 183, comfort (K5) = 180. The third alternative recommendation for electronic money obtained by Dana has a value of 0.227 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 115, security (K2) = 126, promotion (K3) = 117 speed (K4) = 124, comfort (K5) = 111.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Qua Teknika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Qua Teknika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v11i2.345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Qua Teknika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v11i2.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项研究是为了帮助用户选择最好的电子货币。电子货币比传统货币更容易使用。通过使用五个标准,即:方便、安全、晋升、速度和方便。这项研究是对Bekasi市的电子货币用户进行的,共有3,013,851人,样本为44名受访者。使用的方法是加权乘积法。本研究结果表明,OVO获得的第一种备选电子货币推荐值为0.391,具有非常积极的标准,即便利值(K1) = 206,安全性(K2) = 204,推广(K3) = 169,速度(K4) = 203,便利(K5) = 183。Go-Pay获得的第二种替代电子货币推荐值为0.359,其标准具有非常积极的作用,即便利值(K1) = 182,安全性(K2) = 168,推广(K3) = 166,速度(K4) = 183,舒适度(K5) = 180。Dana获得的第三个电子货币替代建议值为0.227,其标准具有非常积极的作用,即便利值(K1) = 115,安全性(K2) = 126,推广(K3) = 117,速度(K4) = 124,舒适度(K5) = 111。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTASI METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN LAYANAN UANG ELEKTRONIK TERBAIK
This research was conducted to assist users in choosing the best electronic money. Where electronic money is easier to use than conventional money. By using five criteria, namely: convenience, security, promotion, speed, and convenience. This research was conducted on electronic money users in the city of Bekasi with a population of 3,013,851 people using a sample of 44 respondents. The method used is the weighted product method. The results of this study indicate that the first alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by OVO has a value of 0.391 with very positive criteria, namely convenience value (K1) = 206, security (K2) = 204, promotion (K3) = 169, speed (K4 ) = 203, convenience (K5) = 183. The second alternative electronic money recommendation obtained by Go-Pay has a value of 0.359 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 182, security (K2) = 168, promotion (K3 ) = 166, speed (K4) = 183, comfort (K5) = 180. The third alternative recommendation for electronic money obtained by Dana has a value of 0.227 with criteria that have a very positive effect, namely convenience value (K1) = 115, security (K2) = 126, promotion (K3) = 117 speed (K4) = 124, comfort (K5) = 111.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信