N. Khattak, H. Derakhshan, D. Thambiratnam, N. Perera, J. Ingham
{"title":"利用遗产建筑记录来描述澳大利亚布里斯班的无加固砖石建筑","authors":"N. Khattak, H. Derakhshan, D. Thambiratnam, N. Perera, J. Ingham","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2112286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Worldwide, unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are present in abundance with many holding cultural and heritage value. URM buildings have a known history of poor performance during past earthquakes because of the weak tensile properties and lack of mechanical connections between elements. Information about the construction of URM buildings for a region is important because it can help engineers and policy makers to perform seismic assessment, risk and loss studies. In this regard, this study includes a characterisation of the heritage URM buildings in Brisbane City, Australia, and its surrounding suburbs using the Queensland Heritage Register (QHR). The QHR includes a total of 1775 heritage sites, of which 323 are identified as URM buildings in Brisbane City and surrounding suburbs. The studied building characteristics obtained from QHR included the architectural styles, construction year, function/use, number of storeys, roof material and load-bearing wall materials. Other features such as roof types (shapes), plan geometry, isolated or interconnected buildings, verandas and openings, and finally the presence of seismic hazards such as gable-end walls, chimneys, and parapets have been obtained using online 3D maps. It was concluded that heritage registers in combination with online digital resources can be successfully utilised to characterise URM buildings.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using heritage building registers to characterise unreinforced masonry buildings of Brisbane, Australia\",\"authors\":\"N. Khattak, H. Derakhshan, D. Thambiratnam, N. Perera, J. Ingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2022.2112286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Worldwide, unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are present in abundance with many holding cultural and heritage value. URM buildings have a known history of poor performance during past earthquakes because of the weak tensile properties and lack of mechanical connections between elements. Information about the construction of URM buildings for a region is important because it can help engineers and policy makers to perform seismic assessment, risk and loss studies. In this regard, this study includes a characterisation of the heritage URM buildings in Brisbane City, Australia, and its surrounding suburbs using the Queensland Heritage Register (QHR). The QHR includes a total of 1775 heritage sites, of which 323 are identified as URM buildings in Brisbane City and surrounding suburbs. The studied building characteristics obtained from QHR included the architectural styles, construction year, function/use, number of storeys, roof material and load-bearing wall materials. Other features such as roof types (shapes), plan geometry, isolated or interconnected buildings, verandas and openings, and finally the presence of seismic hazards such as gable-end walls, chimneys, and parapets have been obtained using online 3D maps. It was concluded that heritage registers in combination with online digital resources can be successfully utilised to characterise URM buildings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2112286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2112286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using heritage building registers to characterise unreinforced masonry buildings of Brisbane, Australia
ABSTRACT Worldwide, unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are present in abundance with many holding cultural and heritage value. URM buildings have a known history of poor performance during past earthquakes because of the weak tensile properties and lack of mechanical connections between elements. Information about the construction of URM buildings for a region is important because it can help engineers and policy makers to perform seismic assessment, risk and loss studies. In this regard, this study includes a characterisation of the heritage URM buildings in Brisbane City, Australia, and its surrounding suburbs using the Queensland Heritage Register (QHR). The QHR includes a total of 1775 heritage sites, of which 323 are identified as URM buildings in Brisbane City and surrounding suburbs. The studied building characteristics obtained from QHR included the architectural styles, construction year, function/use, number of storeys, roof material and load-bearing wall materials. Other features such as roof types (shapes), plan geometry, isolated or interconnected buildings, verandas and openings, and finally the presence of seismic hazards such as gable-end walls, chimneys, and parapets have been obtained using online 3D maps. It was concluded that heritage registers in combination with online digital resources can be successfully utilised to characterise URM buildings.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.