MED-EL型人工耳蜗儿童镫骨电反射和电极阻抗的长期稳定性

Maram Mohamed Rashad Ghoniem, A. Elsharabasy, Y. Shabana, E. Ismail
{"title":"MED-EL型人工耳蜗儿童镫骨电反射和电极阻抗的长期稳定性","authors":"Maram Mohamed Rashad Ghoniem, A. Elsharabasy, Y. Shabana, E. Ismail","doi":"10.58775/2735-3990.1381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRTs) and electrodes impedance over time in children with MED-EL cochlear implants. Methods: In this study, 60 kids were included, while 15 kids were excluded because their cases did not fit the requirements. Patients who received MED-EL cochlear implants were monitored postoperatively over 5 years to determine whether or not their electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) and electrode impedance remained stable. Results: At the initial fitting, electrodes 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 showed significantly different impedances, while electrodes 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, and 12 showed no significantly different impedances. Excluding electrode 12, all electrodes showed a statistically significant difference in ESRT at three and 6 months. All electrodes, except electrodes 7 and 8, showed no difference between ESRT and the behaviorally based MAP most comfortable level (MCL). After three months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP for the audiometric frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Conclusion: Particularly at 3 and 6 months, there was a considerable decrease in electrode impedance, which stabilized throughout the course of the remaining follow-up period. Nearly all the electrodes showed a significant variation in ESRT between 3 and 6 months, but over the subsequent 5 years, ESRT essentially stabilized. Additionally, there was no difference between behavioral-based MAP and ESRT MCL; nevertheless, after 3 months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP at the 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz audiometric frequencies.","PeriodicalId":18173,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term stability of electrical stapedial reflex and electrodes impedance in children with MED-EL cochlear implants\",\"authors\":\"Maram Mohamed Rashad Ghoniem, A. Elsharabasy, Y. Shabana, E. Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.58775/2735-3990.1381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRTs) and electrodes impedance over time in children with MED-EL cochlear implants. Methods: In this study, 60 kids were included, while 15 kids were excluded because their cases did not fit the requirements. Patients who received MED-EL cochlear implants were monitored postoperatively over 5 years to determine whether or not their electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) and electrode impedance remained stable. Results: At the initial fitting, electrodes 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 showed significantly different impedances, while electrodes 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, and 12 showed no significantly different impedances. Excluding electrode 12, all electrodes showed a statistically significant difference in ESRT at three and 6 months. All electrodes, except electrodes 7 and 8, showed no difference between ESRT and the behaviorally based MAP most comfortable level (MCL). After three months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP for the audiometric frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Conclusion: Particularly at 3 and 6 months, there was a considerable decrease in electrode impedance, which stabilized throughout the course of the remaining follow-up period. Nearly all the electrodes showed a significant variation in ESRT between 3 and 6 months, but over the subsequent 5 years, ESRT essentially stabilized. Additionally, there was no difference between behavioral-based MAP and ESRT MCL; nevertheless, after 3 months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP at the 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz audiometric frequencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58775/2735-3990.1381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58775/2735-3990.1381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是研究MED-EL耳蜗植入儿童的电诱发镫骨反射阈值(ESRTs)和电极阻抗随时间的变化。方法:本研究纳入60例儿童,因病例不符合要求而被排除15例。接受MED-EL人工耳蜗植入的患者术后监测5年,以确定其电诱发镫骨反射阈值(ESRT)和电极阻抗是否保持稳定。结果:初始拟合时,电极4、5、6、8、9的阻抗有显著差异,电极1、2、3、7、10、11、12的阻抗无显著差异。除第12电极外,所有电极在3个月和6个月时的ESRT均有统计学差异。除电极7和8外,所有电极在ESRT和基于行为的MAP最舒适水平(MCL)之间没有差异。3个月后,ESRT和行为MAP在听力频率500、1000、2000和4000 Hz上有显著差异。结论:特别是在3个月和6个月时,电极阻抗显著下降,并在剩余的随访期间保持稳定。在3 - 6个月期间,几乎所有电极的ESRT都有显著变化,但在随后的5年里,ESRT基本稳定。此外,基于行为的MAP和ESRT的MCL之间没有差异;然而,3个月后,在500、1000、2000和4000 Hz听力学频率下,ESRT和行为MAP之间存在高度显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term stability of electrical stapedial reflex and electrodes impedance in children with MED-EL cochlear implants
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRTs) and electrodes impedance over time in children with MED-EL cochlear implants. Methods: In this study, 60 kids were included, while 15 kids were excluded because their cases did not fit the requirements. Patients who received MED-EL cochlear implants were monitored postoperatively over 5 years to determine whether or not their electrical evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) and electrode impedance remained stable. Results: At the initial fitting, electrodes 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 showed significantly different impedances, while electrodes 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, and 12 showed no significantly different impedances. Excluding electrode 12, all electrodes showed a statistically significant difference in ESRT at three and 6 months. All electrodes, except electrodes 7 and 8, showed no difference between ESRT and the behaviorally based MAP most comfortable level (MCL). After three months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP for the audiometric frequencies 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Conclusion: Particularly at 3 and 6 months, there was a considerable decrease in electrode impedance, which stabilized throughout the course of the remaining follow-up period. Nearly all the electrodes showed a significant variation in ESRT between 3 and 6 months, but over the subsequent 5 years, ESRT essentially stabilized. Additionally, there was no difference between behavioral-based MAP and ESRT MCL; nevertheless, after 3 months, there was a highly significant difference between ESRT and the behavioral MAP at the 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz audiometric frequencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信