FDA建议对报道的真空辅助分娩和发病率的影响

Michael G. Ross, Meredith Fresquez, Mostafa A. El-Haddad
{"title":"FDA建议对报道的真空辅助分娩和发病率的影响","authors":"Michael G. Ross,&nbsp;Meredith Fresquez,&nbsp;Mostafa A. El-Haddad","doi":"10.1002/1520-6661(200011/12)9:6<321::AID-MFM1000>3.0.CO;2-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>In May 1998 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a health advisory reporting neonatal injuries/deaths following vacuum delivery and encouraged voluntary reports of future adverse events. We compared FDA reports of vacuum delivery adverse events prior to and following the advisory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The FDA database (MAUDE) was searched for vacuum deliveries using brand name, manufacturer name, and procedure “string searches.” Cases were sorted by report date, source, and manufacturer. Neonatal morbidity was quantified as deaths and life-threatening or nonlife-threatening events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 80 reported adverse cases were identified after duplicate cases were consolidated. Twenty-five were reported to the FDA prior to the 1998 advisory and 55 in the immediate 6-month period following the advisory. There was a 22-fold increase in reported events from five events/year prior to the advisory to an estimated 110 events/year following the advisory. The distribution of reporting sources changed significantly following the advisory with increased “manufacturer” (8–43%) and decreased “voluntary” reports (56–20%). All major brand names were represented. During the 6 months following the FDA advisory there were 10 neonatal deaths, 30 life-threatening events, 12 nonlife-threatening events, and three equipment-related reports. Infant deaths were due to intracranial or subgaleal hematomas. Injuries included skull fracture, scalp abrasions, and cephalohematomas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The FDA advisory was associated with a 22-fold increase in the rate of reported adverse events. This increase in reporting likely represents both enhanced awareness of complications as well as an increase in vacuum-related adverse neonatal sequelae. As vacuum delivery is associated with greater neonatal morbidity/mortality than was previously recognized, the adage that the vacuum is “designed to come off before infant damage occurs” appears unsubstantiated. It is recommended that manufacturers quantify the suction and traction capabilities of present and new proposed vacuum cup designs. J. Matern.-Fetal Med. 2000;9:321–326. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"9 6","pages":"321-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1520-6661(200011/12)9:6<321::AID-MFM1000>3.0.CO;2-W","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of FDA advisory on reported vacuum-assisted delivery and morbidity\",\"authors\":\"Michael G. Ross,&nbsp;Meredith Fresquez,&nbsp;Mostafa A. El-Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1520-6661(200011/12)9:6<321::AID-MFM1000>3.0.CO;2-W\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>In May 1998 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a health advisory reporting neonatal injuries/deaths following vacuum delivery and encouraged voluntary reports of future adverse events. We compared FDA reports of vacuum delivery adverse events prior to and following the advisory.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The FDA database (MAUDE) was searched for vacuum deliveries using brand name, manufacturer name, and procedure “string searches.” Cases were sorted by report date, source, and manufacturer. Neonatal morbidity was quantified as deaths and life-threatening or nonlife-threatening events.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 80 reported adverse cases were identified after duplicate cases were consolidated. Twenty-five were reported to the FDA prior to the 1998 advisory and 55 in the immediate 6-month period following the advisory. There was a 22-fold increase in reported events from five events/year prior to the advisory to an estimated 110 events/year following the advisory. The distribution of reporting sources changed significantly following the advisory with increased “manufacturer” (8–43%) and decreased “voluntary” reports (56–20%). All major brand names were represented. During the 6 months following the FDA advisory there were 10 neonatal deaths, 30 life-threatening events, 12 nonlife-threatening events, and three equipment-related reports. Infant deaths were due to intracranial or subgaleal hematomas. Injuries included skull fracture, scalp abrasions, and cephalohematomas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The FDA advisory was associated with a 22-fold increase in the rate of reported adverse events. This increase in reporting likely represents both enhanced awareness of complications as well as an increase in vacuum-related adverse neonatal sequelae. As vacuum delivery is associated with greater neonatal morbidity/mortality than was previously recognized, the adage that the vacuum is “designed to come off before infant damage occurs” appears unsubstantiated. It is recommended that manufacturers quantify the suction and traction capabilities of present and new proposed vacuum cup designs. J. Matern.-Fetal Med. 2000;9:321–326. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"321-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1520-6661(200011/12)9:6<321::AID-MFM1000>3.0.CO;2-W\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1520-6661%28200011/12%299%3A6%3C321%3A%3AAID-MFM1000%3E3.0.CO%3B2-W\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1520-6661%28200011/12%299%3A6%3C321%3A%3AAID-MFM1000%3E3.0.CO%3B2-W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

目的1998年5月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布了一份健康咨询报告,报告了真空分娩后新生儿受伤/死亡的情况,并鼓励自愿报告未来的不良事件。我们比较了FDA报告的真空输送不良事件之前和之后的咨询。方法对FDA数据库(MAUDE)使用品牌名称、制造商名称和流程“字符串搜索”检索真空输送。病例按报告日期、来源和制造商分类。新生儿发病率量化为死亡和危及生命或非危及生命的事件。结果合并重复病例后,共鉴定出80例不良报告。在1998年的建议之前,有25例报告给了FDA,而在建议发布后的6个月内,有55例报告给了FDA。报告的事件增加了22倍,从咨询前的5起/年增加到咨询后的110起/年。报告来源的分布在咨询后发生了显著变化,“制造商”报告增加(8-43%),“自愿”报告减少(56-20%)。所有主要品牌都有代表。在FDA发布建议后的6个月内,有10例新生儿死亡,30例危及生命事件,12例非危及生命事件和3例与设备相关的报告。婴儿死亡是由于颅内或galeal下血肿。损伤包括颅骨骨折、头皮擦伤和头血肿。FDA的建议与报告的不良事件发生率增加22倍有关。报告的增加可能既表明对并发症的认识增强,也表明与真空相关的新生儿不良后遗症的增加。由于真空分娩与更高的新生儿发病率/死亡率相关,这比以前认识到的要高,因此真空“在婴儿损伤发生之前被设计出来”的谚语似乎没有根据。建议制造商量化目前和新提出的真空吸盘设计的吸力和牵引能力。j . Matern。-胎儿医学,2000;9:21 1 - 326。©2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of FDA advisory on reported vacuum-assisted delivery and morbidity

Objective

In May 1998 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a health advisory reporting neonatal injuries/deaths following vacuum delivery and encouraged voluntary reports of future adverse events. We compared FDA reports of vacuum delivery adverse events prior to and following the advisory.

Methods

The FDA database (MAUDE) was searched for vacuum deliveries using brand name, manufacturer name, and procedure “string searches.” Cases were sorted by report date, source, and manufacturer. Neonatal morbidity was quantified as deaths and life-threatening or nonlife-threatening events.

Results

A total of 80 reported adverse cases were identified after duplicate cases were consolidated. Twenty-five were reported to the FDA prior to the 1998 advisory and 55 in the immediate 6-month period following the advisory. There was a 22-fold increase in reported events from five events/year prior to the advisory to an estimated 110 events/year following the advisory. The distribution of reporting sources changed significantly following the advisory with increased “manufacturer” (8–43%) and decreased “voluntary” reports (56–20%). All major brand names were represented. During the 6 months following the FDA advisory there were 10 neonatal deaths, 30 life-threatening events, 12 nonlife-threatening events, and three equipment-related reports. Infant deaths were due to intracranial or subgaleal hematomas. Injuries included skull fracture, scalp abrasions, and cephalohematomas.

Conclusions

The FDA advisory was associated with a 22-fold increase in the rate of reported adverse events. This increase in reporting likely represents both enhanced awareness of complications as well as an increase in vacuum-related adverse neonatal sequelae. As vacuum delivery is associated with greater neonatal morbidity/mortality than was previously recognized, the adage that the vacuum is “designed to come off before infant damage occurs” appears unsubstantiated. It is recommended that manufacturers quantify the suction and traction capabilities of present and new proposed vacuum cup designs. J. Matern.-Fetal Med. 2000;9:321–326. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信