专利法、适格性与外部研发:经验证据

Yun Hou, I. Png, X. Xiong
{"title":"专利法、适格性与外部研发:经验证据","authors":"Yun Hou, I. Png, X. Xiong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3029106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretically, whether technology firms should increase external R&D in response to stronger patent law depends on the effects of law on returns to external and internal R&D. Exploiting geographical differences in the strengthening of patent protection due to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, we find that, on average, external R&D increased by 42.3 percent. The effect was more pronounced among companies less intensive in manufacturing, smaller in scope, and in complex-technology and more geographically concentrated industries, and those where patents were less effective in appropriability.","PeriodicalId":11837,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patent Law, Appropriability, and External R&D: Empirical Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Yun Hou, I. Png, X. Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3029106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretically, whether technology firms should increase external R&D in response to stronger patent law depends on the effects of law on returns to external and internal R&D. Exploiting geographical differences in the strengthening of patent protection due to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, we find that, on average, external R&D increased by 42.3 percent. The effect was more pronounced among companies less intensive in manufacturing, smaller in scope, and in complex-technology and more geographically concentrated industries, and those where patents were less effective in appropriability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3029106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3029106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论上,技术公司是否应该增加外部研发以应对更强的专利法,取决于法律对外部研发和内部研发回报的影响。利用美国联邦巡回上诉法院在加强专利保护方面的地域差异,我们发现,平均而言,外部研发增加了42.3%。这种影响在制造业集中度较低、规模较小、技术复杂、地域集中度较高的行业,以及专利适用效率较低的企业中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patent Law, Appropriability, and External R&D: Empirical Evidence
Theoretically, whether technology firms should increase external R&D in response to stronger patent law depends on the effects of law on returns to external and internal R&D. Exploiting geographical differences in the strengthening of patent protection due to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, we find that, on average, external R&D increased by 42.3 percent. The effect was more pronounced among companies less intensive in manufacturing, smaller in scope, and in complex-technology and more geographically concentrated industries, and those where patents were less effective in appropriability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信