M. Yalçın, Neslihan Simsek, A. Keleş, F. Ahmetoğlu, A. Dündar, I. Umar
{"title":"唾液污染对自蚀刻胶粘剂粘接后微拉伸强度的影响","authors":"M. Yalçın, Neslihan Simsek, A. Keleş, F. Ahmetoğlu, A. Dündar, I. Umar","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.116036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of two self-etching (SE) adhesive systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond). Materials and Methods: Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were created on 12 extracted human third molar teeth. The two bonding systems and resin composite (Spectrum® TPH® 3) were bonded to the dentin under six surface conditions: Group 1: Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups. Clearfil SE 1: This was a control group in which dentin was not contaminated with the saliva (primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 2: Contaminated once (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 3: The samples were contaminated 2 times (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Group 2: The procedures for Group 2 were similar to Group 1 but did not contain a primer stage. Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups (Clearfil S3 1, 2, and 3). After 24 h, the teeth were prepared for microtensile bond testing and tensile bond strength was measured (1 mm/min). The data were calculated as megapascal (MPa) and analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s post-hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The μTBS of the Clearfil S3 3 subgroup was statistically higher than that of the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and Clearfil S3 1 subgroup. There were no significant statistical differences in the μTBSs between the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and the control subgroup. There were no statistical differences in μTBSs among the Clearfil SE subgroups. Conclusion: μTBS is not affected adversely from one or two saliva contamination after the bonding procedure.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"20 1","pages":"55 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of salivary contamination on micro-tensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives systems after bonding procedure\",\"authors\":\"M. Yalçın, Neslihan Simsek, A. Keleş, F. Ahmetoğlu, A. Dündar, I. Umar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2321-4619.116036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of two self-etching (SE) adhesive systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond). Materials and Methods: Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were created on 12 extracted human third molar teeth. The two bonding systems and resin composite (Spectrum® TPH® 3) were bonded to the dentin under six surface conditions: Group 1: Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups. Clearfil SE 1: This was a control group in which dentin was not contaminated with the saliva (primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 2: Contaminated once (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 3: The samples were contaminated 2 times (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Group 2: The procedures for Group 2 were similar to Group 1 but did not contain a primer stage. Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups (Clearfil S3 1, 2, and 3). After 24 h, the teeth were prepared for microtensile bond testing and tensile bond strength was measured (1 mm/min). The data were calculated as megapascal (MPa) and analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s post-hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The μTBS of the Clearfil S3 3 subgroup was statistically higher than that of the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and Clearfil S3 1 subgroup. There were no significant statistical differences in the μTBSs between the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and the control subgroup. There were no statistical differences in μTBSs among the Clearfil SE subgroups. Conclusion: μTBS is not affected adversely from one or two saliva contamination after the bonding procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.116036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.116036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的:研究唾液污染对两种自腐蚀(SE)粘结体系(Clearfil SE bond、Clearfil S3 bond)微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。材料与方法:在12颗拔除的人第三磨牙上建立牙本质平面。两种粘接系统和树脂复合材料(Spectrum®TPH®3)在六种表面条件下与牙本质粘接:第一组:牙齿样本随机分为三个相同的亚组。Clearfil SE 1:这是一个对照组,牙本质没有被唾液污染(引物/结合物/复合物)。Clearfil SE 2:污染一次(底漆/粘接(固化)/唾液/冲洗/干燥/底漆/粘接/复合)。Clearfil SE 3:样品污染2次(引物/粘接(固化)/唾液/冲洗/干燥/引物/粘接(固化)/唾液/冲洗/干燥/引物/粘接/复合)。第2组:第2组的程序与第1组相似,但不包含引物阶段。将牙齿样本随机分为3个相同的亚组(Clearfil S3 1、2、3),24 h后制备牙齿进行微拉伸粘结试验,测量拉伸粘结强度(1 mm/min)。数据以兆帕斯卡(MPa)计算,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(P < 0.05)进行分析。结果:clearfils3 3亚组的μTBS明显高于clearfils3 2亚组和clearfils3 1亚组。clearfils3 2亚组与对照组的μ tbs差异无统计学意义。clearfilse亚组间μ tbs无统计学差异。结论:粘接后1 ~ 2次唾液污染对μTBS无不良影响。
Effect of salivary contamination on micro-tensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives systems after bonding procedure
Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of two self-etching (SE) adhesive systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond). Materials and Methods: Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were created on 12 extracted human third molar teeth. The two bonding systems and resin composite (Spectrum® TPH® 3) were bonded to the dentin under six surface conditions: Group 1: Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups. Clearfil SE 1: This was a control group in which dentin was not contaminated with the saliva (primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 2: Contaminated once (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Clearfil SE 3: The samples were contaminated 2 times (primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding (cured)/saliva/rinsing/drying/primer/bonding/composite). Group 2: The procedures for Group 2 were similar to Group 1 but did not contain a primer stage. Tooth samples were randomly divided into three equal subgroups (Clearfil S3 1, 2, and 3). After 24 h, the teeth were prepared for microtensile bond testing and tensile bond strength was measured (1 mm/min). The data were calculated as megapascal (MPa) and analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s post-hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The μTBS of the Clearfil S3 3 subgroup was statistically higher than that of the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and Clearfil S3 1 subgroup. There were no significant statistical differences in the μTBSs between the Clearfil S3 2 subgroup and the control subgroup. There were no statistical differences in μTBSs among the Clearfil SE subgroups. Conclusion: μTBS is not affected adversely from one or two saliva contamination after the bonding procedure.