同伴评鉴效度是评鉴者智力和评鉴得分的函数。项目mr005.13-5001,子任务1,代表24。

R. Doll
{"title":"同伴评鉴效度是评鉴者智力和评鉴得分的函数。项目mr005.13-5001,子任务1,代表24。","authors":"R. Doll","doi":"10.1037/e439952004-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.","PeriodicalId":78941,"journal":{"name":"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEER RATING VALIDITY AS A FUNCTION OF RATER INTELLIGENCE AND RATING SCORE RECEIVED. PROJ MR005.13-5001, SUBTASK 1, REP 24.\",\"authors\":\"R. Doll\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e439952004-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1963-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e439952004-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e439952004-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对548名军校学员的记录进行三种分析方法的结果表明,当与智力总体高于平均水平的人群打交道时,在考虑他所给出的评分的有效性时,几乎没有理由考虑相当智力。对于评价者收到的同行评分分数也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PEER RATING VALIDITY AS A FUNCTION OF RATER INTELLIGENCE AND RATING SCORE RECEIVED. PROJ MR005.13-5001, SUBTASK 1, REP 24.
Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信