编者注

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
A. Slaton, Tiago Saraiva
{"title":"编者注","authors":"A. Slaton, Tiago Saraiva","doi":"10.1080/07341512.2019.1695444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue represents the first half of a collaboration between History+Technology and the Journal of the History of Biology. JHB co-editor Karen Rader has guest edited this issue of H + T, and in the coming months we will in turn present a set of articles in a special issue of JHB. The editors of both journals are excited to test the possibility that challenging familiar topical commitments can bring new criticality to all. As we see it, this collaboration does more than historicize the engineering/science binary. Rather, it suggests that these two categories themselves enact historical projects like resource extraction, capitalism, socialism, the making of states, the making of life. When practical endeavors generally seen as ‘engineering’ are demarcated analytically from conceptual processes seen as ‘scientific discovery’ or ‘-research’ those historical projects, and their social origins and impacts, are easily obscured. To make histories of technology and biology–in all their institutional, political, material and corporeal expressions–accountable to one another is, we think, to make them accountable to history more generally. Finally, not least among our reasons for swapping editorial labor in this way: we are thrilled to bring the readers of H + T a sampling of JHB’s ambitious analytical reach, and later, to introduce JHB readers to the historiographic aims, and disruptions, ofH + T. We hope to see these two special issues shared widely within and beyond their familiar disciplinary homes, yielding new audiences, and new questions, for both.","PeriodicalId":45996,"journal":{"name":"History and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ note\",\"authors\":\"A. Slaton, Tiago Saraiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07341512.2019.1695444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue represents the first half of a collaboration between History+Technology and the Journal of the History of Biology. JHB co-editor Karen Rader has guest edited this issue of H + T, and in the coming months we will in turn present a set of articles in a special issue of JHB. The editors of both journals are excited to test the possibility that challenging familiar topical commitments can bring new criticality to all. As we see it, this collaboration does more than historicize the engineering/science binary. Rather, it suggests that these two categories themselves enact historical projects like resource extraction, capitalism, socialism, the making of states, the making of life. When practical endeavors generally seen as ‘engineering’ are demarcated analytically from conceptual processes seen as ‘scientific discovery’ or ‘-research’ those historical projects, and their social origins and impacts, are easily obscured. To make histories of technology and biology–in all their institutional, political, material and corporeal expressions–accountable to one another is, we think, to make them accountable to history more generally. Finally, not least among our reasons for swapping editorial labor in this way: we are thrilled to bring the readers of H + T a sampling of JHB’s ambitious analytical reach, and later, to introduce JHB readers to the historiographic aims, and disruptions, ofH + T. We hope to see these two special issues shared widely within and beyond their familiar disciplinary homes, yielding new audiences, and new questions, for both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1695444\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1695444","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期特刊是《历史+技术》与《生物历史杂志》合作的前半部分。JHB的联合编辑Karen Rader客座编辑了这一期的《H + T》,在接下来的几个月里,我们将在JHB的一期特刊中依次呈现一系列文章。两家期刊的编辑都很兴奋地测试挑战熟悉的主题承诺的可能性,可以给所有人带来新的批判性。正如我们所看到的,这种合作不仅仅是将工程/科学二元化。相反,它表明,这两个类别本身制定了诸如资源开采、资本主义、社会主义、国家的形成、生活的形成等历史项目。当通常被视为“工程”的实际努力与被视为“科学发现”或“研究”的概念过程进行分析区分时,那些历史项目及其社会起源和影响很容易被模糊。我们认为,让技术史和生物史——在它们所有的制度、政治、物质和身体表现方面——相互负责,就是让它们对更普遍的历史负责。最后,在我们以这种方式交换编辑工作的原因中,最重要的是:我们很高兴为JHB的读者带来JHB雄心勃勃的分析范围的样本,然后,向JHB的读者介绍H + T的历史目标和中断。我们希望看到这两个特殊问题在他们熟悉的学科领域内外广泛分享,为两者带来新的受众和新的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors’ note
This special issue represents the first half of a collaboration between History+Technology and the Journal of the History of Biology. JHB co-editor Karen Rader has guest edited this issue of H + T, and in the coming months we will in turn present a set of articles in a special issue of JHB. The editors of both journals are excited to test the possibility that challenging familiar topical commitments can bring new criticality to all. As we see it, this collaboration does more than historicize the engineering/science binary. Rather, it suggests that these two categories themselves enact historical projects like resource extraction, capitalism, socialism, the making of states, the making of life. When practical endeavors generally seen as ‘engineering’ are demarcated analytically from conceptual processes seen as ‘scientific discovery’ or ‘-research’ those historical projects, and their social origins and impacts, are easily obscured. To make histories of technology and biology–in all their institutional, political, material and corporeal expressions–accountable to one another is, we think, to make them accountable to history more generally. Finally, not least among our reasons for swapping editorial labor in this way: we are thrilled to bring the readers of H + T a sampling of JHB’s ambitious analytical reach, and later, to introduce JHB readers to the historiographic aims, and disruptions, ofH + T. We hope to see these two special issues shared widely within and beyond their familiar disciplinary homes, yielding new audiences, and new questions, for both.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: History and Technology serves as an international forum for research on technology in history. A guiding premise is that technology—as knowledge, practice, and material resource—has been a key site for constituting the human experience. In the modern era, it becomes central to our understanding of the making and transformation of societies and cultures, on a local or transnational scale. The journal welcomes historical contributions on any aspect of technology but encourages research that addresses this wider frame through commensurate analytic and critical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信