通过封闭的前厅进行更快、更安全的疏散

I. Sticco, G. Frank, C. Dorso
{"title":"通过封闭的前厅进行更快、更安全的疏散","authors":"I. Sticco, G. Frank, C. Dorso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4233917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving emergency evacuations is a top priority in human safety and in pedestrian dynamics. In this paper, we use the social force model, in order to optimize high-anxiety pedestrian evacuations. We explore two architectural layouts, the 1-door vestibule, and the 2-doors vestibule. The\"vestibule\"is defined as the room next to the exit door and it is characterized by two structural parameters: the vestibule width ($d$) and the vestibule door width ($w$). We found that, specific values of $d$ and $w$, can almost double the evacuation flow compared to the no-vestibule scenario. The key to this achievement is that the density (close to the exit door) can be controlled by $d$ and $w$. Therefore, it is possible to tune these parameters to a density that maximizes the available space while preventing the formation of blocking clusters at the exit door ($\\rho \\sim 2.5\\,$p/m$^2$). As opposed to the optimal condition, low-density values ($\\rho \\sim 1\\,$p/m$^2$) lead to suboptimal flow since there is unused space left; while higher density values ($\\rho \\sim 4\\,$p/m$^2$) also lead to suboptimal flow due to the presence of blocking clusters at the exit. Moreover, we take into account the usually foreseen fact that high pressures can actually be reached at the exit, threatening the health of pedestrians. Therefore, we studied the crowd pressure using the agents' overlap as an indicative. We found that the explored vestibules reduce the crowd pressure compared to the no-vestibule situation. In particular, we show that the 2-doors vestibule scenario performs better than the 1-door vestibule, because it reduces the overall local density (by enforcing the crowd to spread out more).","PeriodicalId":21757,"journal":{"name":"Simul. Model. Pract. Theory","volume":"5 1","pages":"102818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faster and safer evacuations induced by closed vestibules\",\"authors\":\"I. Sticco, G. Frank, C. Dorso\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4233917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving emergency evacuations is a top priority in human safety and in pedestrian dynamics. In this paper, we use the social force model, in order to optimize high-anxiety pedestrian evacuations. We explore two architectural layouts, the 1-door vestibule, and the 2-doors vestibule. The\\\"vestibule\\\"is defined as the room next to the exit door and it is characterized by two structural parameters: the vestibule width ($d$) and the vestibule door width ($w$). We found that, specific values of $d$ and $w$, can almost double the evacuation flow compared to the no-vestibule scenario. The key to this achievement is that the density (close to the exit door) can be controlled by $d$ and $w$. Therefore, it is possible to tune these parameters to a density that maximizes the available space while preventing the formation of blocking clusters at the exit door ($\\\\rho \\\\sim 2.5\\\\,$p/m$^2$). As opposed to the optimal condition, low-density values ($\\\\rho \\\\sim 1\\\\,$p/m$^2$) lead to suboptimal flow since there is unused space left; while higher density values ($\\\\rho \\\\sim 4\\\\,$p/m$^2$) also lead to suboptimal flow due to the presence of blocking clusters at the exit. Moreover, we take into account the usually foreseen fact that high pressures can actually be reached at the exit, threatening the health of pedestrians. Therefore, we studied the crowd pressure using the agents' overlap as an indicative. We found that the explored vestibules reduce the crowd pressure compared to the no-vestibule situation. In particular, we show that the 2-doors vestibule scenario performs better than the 1-door vestibule, because it reduces the overall local density (by enforcing the crowd to spread out more).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simul. Model. Pract. Theory\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"102818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simul. Model. Pract. Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4233917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simul. Model. Pract. Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4233917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改善紧急疏散是人类安全和行人动态的首要任务。本文采用社会力模型,对高焦虑行人疏散进行优化。我们探索了两种建筑布局,一门前厅和两门前厅。“前厅”被定义为靠近出口的房间,它的特点是两个结构参数:前厅宽度($d$)和前厅门宽度($w$)。我们发现,与没有前厅的情况相比,$d$和$w$的特定值几乎可以使疏散流量增加一倍。这一成就的关键是密度(接近出口门)可以通过$d$和$w$来控制。因此,可以将这些参数调整为最大限度地利用可用空间的密度,同时防止在出口形成阻塞簇($\rho \sim 2.5\,$ p/m $^2$)。与最优条件相反,低密度值($\rho \sim 1\,$ p/m $^2$)导致次优流量,因为有剩余的未使用空间;而较高的密度值($\rho \sim 4\,$ p/m $^2$)也会导致次优流量,因为在出口存在阻塞簇。此外,我们考虑到通常可以预见的事实,即在出口实际上可以达到高压,威胁行人的健康。因此,我们使用agent的重叠作为指示来研究人群压力。我们发现,与没有前庭的情况相比,探索的前庭减少了人群压力。特别是,我们展示了2门前厅场景比1门前厅场景表现得更好,因为它降低了整体的局部密度(通过强制人群分散更多)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faster and safer evacuations induced by closed vestibules
Improving emergency evacuations is a top priority in human safety and in pedestrian dynamics. In this paper, we use the social force model, in order to optimize high-anxiety pedestrian evacuations. We explore two architectural layouts, the 1-door vestibule, and the 2-doors vestibule. The"vestibule"is defined as the room next to the exit door and it is characterized by two structural parameters: the vestibule width ($d$) and the vestibule door width ($w$). We found that, specific values of $d$ and $w$, can almost double the evacuation flow compared to the no-vestibule scenario. The key to this achievement is that the density (close to the exit door) can be controlled by $d$ and $w$. Therefore, it is possible to tune these parameters to a density that maximizes the available space while preventing the formation of blocking clusters at the exit door ($\rho \sim 2.5\,$p/m$^2$). As opposed to the optimal condition, low-density values ($\rho \sim 1\,$p/m$^2$) lead to suboptimal flow since there is unused space left; while higher density values ($\rho \sim 4\,$p/m$^2$) also lead to suboptimal flow due to the presence of blocking clusters at the exit. Moreover, we take into account the usually foreseen fact that high pressures can actually be reached at the exit, threatening the health of pedestrians. Therefore, we studied the crowd pressure using the agents' overlap as an indicative. We found that the explored vestibules reduce the crowd pressure compared to the no-vestibule situation. In particular, we show that the 2-doors vestibule scenario performs better than the 1-door vestibule, because it reduces the overall local density (by enforcing the crowd to spread out more).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信