黑点:清理费用的责任

H. Bocken
{"title":"黑点:清理费用的责任","authors":"H. Bocken","doi":"10.1016/0166-3097(87)90015-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper describes in what cases, and by whom, remedial action can be taken under Belgian law in order to clean up environmentally dangerous waste deposits. Emphasis is placed on the situation in the Flemish region.</p><p>An overview is given of the general liability rules relevant to the allocation of the clean-up expenses. Especially important, in this respect, are the liability for personal fault and for defective things. Also a number of specific statutory rules imposing strict liability for clean-up expenses are described. Here the act on toxic waste of 22 July, 1974 is given special attention.</p><p>The paper describes the legal position of the most likely defendants in a suit brought by the government in order to recover clean-up costs: the operator or former operator of a disposal site, the producer of hazardous waste, and the subsequent owner of land containing waste.</p><p>The paper concludes by criticising the potential liability of the unsuspecting buyer of land formerly used as a waste-disposal site and which may result from the application of generally accepted principles of tort law. An equitable and efficient allocation system implies that clean-up costs are in the first place borne either by those originally responsible for making the remedial action necessary, or by the operator of the waste-disposal facility, or by the generator of the waste. If it is not possible to allocate the clean-up costs in this way, they should be financed from levies on polluting products or activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101079,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0166-3097(87)90015-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black points: Liability for clean-up costs\",\"authors\":\"H. Bocken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0166-3097(87)90015-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper describes in what cases, and by whom, remedial action can be taken under Belgian law in order to clean up environmentally dangerous waste deposits. Emphasis is placed on the situation in the Flemish region.</p><p>An overview is given of the general liability rules relevant to the allocation of the clean-up expenses. Especially important, in this respect, are the liability for personal fault and for defective things. Also a number of specific statutory rules imposing strict liability for clean-up expenses are described. Here the act on toxic waste of 22 July, 1974 is given special attention.</p><p>The paper describes the legal position of the most likely defendants in a suit brought by the government in order to recover clean-up costs: the operator or former operator of a disposal site, the producer of hazardous waste, and the subsequent owner of land containing waste.</p><p>The paper concludes by criticising the potential liability of the unsuspecting buyer of land formerly used as a waste-disposal site and which may result from the application of generally accepted principles of tort law. An equitable and efficient allocation system implies that clean-up costs are in the first place borne either by those originally responsible for making the remedial action necessary, or by the operator of the waste-disposal facility, or by the generator of the waste. If it is not possible to allocate the clean-up costs in this way, they should be financed from levies on polluting products or activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources and Conservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0166-3097(87)90015-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166309787900150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0166309787900150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该文件描述了在什么情况下,谁可以根据比利时法律采取补救行动,以便清理对环境有害的废物堆积物。重点放在佛兰德地区的局势上。概述了与清理费用分配有关的一般责任规则。在这方面,特别重要的是对个人过错和有缺陷的事物的责任。此外,还叙述了若干规定清理费用严格责任的具体法定规则。在此特别注意1974年7月22日关于有毒废物的法令。这篇论文描述了在政府为收回清理费用而提起的诉讼中最有可能的被告的法律地位:处理场的经营者或前经营者、危险废物的制造者以及随后的含有废物的土地所有者。本文最后批评了以前用作废物处理场的土地的不知情购买者的潜在责任,这可能是适用普遍接受的侵权法原则所导致的。一个公平和有效的分配制度意味着,清理费用首先要么由最初负责采取必要补救行动的人承担,要么由废物处理设施的经营者或废物产生者承担。如果不可能以这种方式分配清理费用,则应从对污染产品或活动的征税中筹措资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Black points: Liability for clean-up costs

The paper describes in what cases, and by whom, remedial action can be taken under Belgian law in order to clean up environmentally dangerous waste deposits. Emphasis is placed on the situation in the Flemish region.

An overview is given of the general liability rules relevant to the allocation of the clean-up expenses. Especially important, in this respect, are the liability for personal fault and for defective things. Also a number of specific statutory rules imposing strict liability for clean-up expenses are described. Here the act on toxic waste of 22 July, 1974 is given special attention.

The paper describes the legal position of the most likely defendants in a suit brought by the government in order to recover clean-up costs: the operator or former operator of a disposal site, the producer of hazardous waste, and the subsequent owner of land containing waste.

The paper concludes by criticising the potential liability of the unsuspecting buyer of land formerly used as a waste-disposal site and which may result from the application of generally accepted principles of tort law. An equitable and efficient allocation system implies that clean-up costs are in the first place borne either by those originally responsible for making the remedial action necessary, or by the operator of the waste-disposal facility, or by the generator of the waste. If it is not possible to allocate the clean-up costs in this way, they should be financed from levies on polluting products or activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信