速率-伪压力反褶积改进了页岩气井的速率-时间模型、生产历史匹配和预测

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
L. R. Ruiz Maraggi, L. Lake, M. Walsh
{"title":"速率-伪压力反褶积改进了页岩气井的速率-时间模型、生产历史匹配和预测","authors":"L. R. Ruiz Maraggi, L. Lake, M. Walsh","doi":"10.2118/208967-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Physics-based and empirical rate-time models inherently assume constant bottomhole flowing pressure (BHP), an assumption that may not hold for many unconventional wells. Hence, applying these models without accounting for BHP variations might lead to inaccurate (a) flow regime identification, (b) estimation of the parameters of these models, and (c) estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and drainage volumes. This study evaluates and compares the predictions of rate-time relations including and ignoring corrections for time-varying BHP for both synthetic and shale gas wells.\n We generate a real gas synthetic case with errors in the time-varying BHP. First, we convert pressures into pseudopressures. Second, we deconvolve the pseudopressure history by applying the regularized exponential basis function inverse scheme to obtain an equivalent rate—the unit-pseudopressure-drop rate at standard conditions—at constant BHP. Third, we history match the production using the scaled single-phase compressible fluid physics-based model for three different approaches: (a) using rate-time-pressure data with rate-pseudopressure deconvolution, (b) using rate-time-pressure data using just rate-pressure deconvolution, and (c) using only rate-time data. Finally, we compare the results in terms of their history matches and estimated reservoir parameters. We conclude by illustrating the application of this procedure to shale gas wells.\n For the synthetic case, the fit of the single-phase compressible fluid rate-time model using rate-pseudopressure deconvolution can accurately estimate the original gas in place, characteristic time, gas permeability, and fracture half-length. In contrast, considerable errors are noted when either using rate-pressure deconvolution or failing to account for variable BHP. Regarding the shale gas examples, the rate-pseudopressure deconvolution scheme accurately identifies the flow regimes present in the well, which can be difficult to detect by only analyzing rate-time data. For this reason, the fits of the scaled single-phase compressible fluid model using only rate-time result in unreasonably large estimates of the reservoir parameters and EUR. In contrast, the application of rate-pseudopressure deconvolution constrains the fits of the single-phase compressible fluid model yielding more realistic estimates of the time of end of transient flow, and EUR.\n This paper illustrates the application of a workflow that accounts for variable BHP by estimating an equivalent constant unit-pseudopressure-drop gas rate (at standard conditions). We illustrate the workflow for a particular decline-curve model, but the workflow is general and can be applied to any rate-time model. The approach history matches and forecasts the production of unconventional gas reservoirs using rate-time models more accurately than assuming constant BHP.","PeriodicalId":22066,"journal":{"name":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate-Pseudopressure Deconvolution Enhances Rate-Time Models Production History-Matches and Forecasts of Shale Gas Wells\",\"authors\":\"L. R. Ruiz Maraggi, L. Lake, M. Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/208967-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Physics-based and empirical rate-time models inherently assume constant bottomhole flowing pressure (BHP), an assumption that may not hold for many unconventional wells. Hence, applying these models without accounting for BHP variations might lead to inaccurate (a) flow regime identification, (b) estimation of the parameters of these models, and (c) estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and drainage volumes. This study evaluates and compares the predictions of rate-time relations including and ignoring corrections for time-varying BHP for both synthetic and shale gas wells.\\n We generate a real gas synthetic case with errors in the time-varying BHP. First, we convert pressures into pseudopressures. Second, we deconvolve the pseudopressure history by applying the regularized exponential basis function inverse scheme to obtain an equivalent rate—the unit-pseudopressure-drop rate at standard conditions—at constant BHP. Third, we history match the production using the scaled single-phase compressible fluid physics-based model for three different approaches: (a) using rate-time-pressure data with rate-pseudopressure deconvolution, (b) using rate-time-pressure data using just rate-pressure deconvolution, and (c) using only rate-time data. Finally, we compare the results in terms of their history matches and estimated reservoir parameters. We conclude by illustrating the application of this procedure to shale gas wells.\\n For the synthetic case, the fit of the single-phase compressible fluid rate-time model using rate-pseudopressure deconvolution can accurately estimate the original gas in place, characteristic time, gas permeability, and fracture half-length. In contrast, considerable errors are noted when either using rate-pressure deconvolution or failing to account for variable BHP. Regarding the shale gas examples, the rate-pseudopressure deconvolution scheme accurately identifies the flow regimes present in the well, which can be difficult to detect by only analyzing rate-time data. For this reason, the fits of the scaled single-phase compressible fluid model using only rate-time result in unreasonably large estimates of the reservoir parameters and EUR. In contrast, the application of rate-pseudopressure deconvolution constrains the fits of the single-phase compressible fluid model yielding more realistic estimates of the time of end of transient flow, and EUR.\\n This paper illustrates the application of a workflow that accounts for variable BHP by estimating an equivalent constant unit-pseudopressure-drop gas rate (at standard conditions). We illustrate the workflow for a particular decline-curve model, but the workflow is general and can be applied to any rate-time model. The approach history matches and forecasts the production of unconventional gas reservoirs using rate-time models more accurately than assuming constant BHP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/208967-pa\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208967-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于物理和经验的速度-时间模型固有地假设井底流动压力(BHP)恒定,这一假设可能不适用于许多非常规井。因此,在不考虑BHP变化的情况下应用这些模型可能会导致不准确的(a)流态识别,(b)这些模型参数的估计,以及(c)估计的最终采收率(EUR)和排量。本研究对合成气井和页岩气井的速度-时间关系预测进行了评估和比较,包括和忽略了对时变BHP的修正。我们生成了一个具有时变BHP误差的真实气体合成案例。首先,我们把压力转换成伪压力。其次,我们通过应用正则化指数基函数逆格式对伪压力历史进行反卷积,以获得恒定BHP下标准条件下的等效速率-单位伪压降速率。第三,我们使用基于单相可压缩流体物理模型的三种不同方法对产量进行历史匹配:(a)使用速率-时间-压力数据与速率-伪压力反褶积,(b)使用速率-时间-压力数据仅使用速率-压力反褶积,(c)仅使用速率-时间数据。最后,我们比较了它们的历史匹配结果和估计的储层参数。最后,我们举例说明了该方法在页岩气井中的应用。在综合情况下,采用速率-伪压力反褶积方法拟合单相可压缩流体速率-时间模型,可以准确估计原始含气量、特征时间、渗透率和裂缝半长。相比之下,当使用速率压力反褶积或未考虑可变BHP时,会注意到相当大的错误。对于页岩气的例子,速率-伪压力反褶积方案可以准确识别井中存在的流动形式,而仅通过分析速率-时间数据很难检测到这一点。因此,仅使用速率时间拟合缩放单相可压缩流体模型会导致对储层参数和EUR的不合理的大估计。相比之下,速率-伪压力反褶积的应用限制了单相可压缩流体模型的拟合,从而对瞬态流动的结束时间和EUR进行了更真实的估计。本文阐述了一种工作流程的应用,该工作流程通过估算等效恒定单位假压降气速(在标准条件下)来考虑可变BHP。我们举例说明了一个特定的下降曲线模型的工作流,但工作流是通用的,可以应用于任何速率-时间模型。该方法使用速率-时间模型来匹配和预测非常规气藏的产量,比假设BHP恒定更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rate-Pseudopressure Deconvolution Enhances Rate-Time Models Production History-Matches and Forecasts of Shale Gas Wells
Physics-based and empirical rate-time models inherently assume constant bottomhole flowing pressure (BHP), an assumption that may not hold for many unconventional wells. Hence, applying these models without accounting for BHP variations might lead to inaccurate (a) flow regime identification, (b) estimation of the parameters of these models, and (c) estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) and drainage volumes. This study evaluates and compares the predictions of rate-time relations including and ignoring corrections for time-varying BHP for both synthetic and shale gas wells. We generate a real gas synthetic case with errors in the time-varying BHP. First, we convert pressures into pseudopressures. Second, we deconvolve the pseudopressure history by applying the regularized exponential basis function inverse scheme to obtain an equivalent rate—the unit-pseudopressure-drop rate at standard conditions—at constant BHP. Third, we history match the production using the scaled single-phase compressible fluid physics-based model for three different approaches: (a) using rate-time-pressure data with rate-pseudopressure deconvolution, (b) using rate-time-pressure data using just rate-pressure deconvolution, and (c) using only rate-time data. Finally, we compare the results in terms of their history matches and estimated reservoir parameters. We conclude by illustrating the application of this procedure to shale gas wells. For the synthetic case, the fit of the single-phase compressible fluid rate-time model using rate-pseudopressure deconvolution can accurately estimate the original gas in place, characteristic time, gas permeability, and fracture half-length. In contrast, considerable errors are noted when either using rate-pressure deconvolution or failing to account for variable BHP. Regarding the shale gas examples, the rate-pseudopressure deconvolution scheme accurately identifies the flow regimes present in the well, which can be difficult to detect by only analyzing rate-time data. For this reason, the fits of the scaled single-phase compressible fluid model using only rate-time result in unreasonably large estimates of the reservoir parameters and EUR. In contrast, the application of rate-pseudopressure deconvolution constrains the fits of the single-phase compressible fluid model yielding more realistic estimates of the time of end of transient flow, and EUR. This paper illustrates the application of a workflow that accounts for variable BHP by estimating an equivalent constant unit-pseudopressure-drop gas rate (at standard conditions). We illustrate the workflow for a particular decline-curve model, but the workflow is general and can be applied to any rate-time model. The approach history matches and forecasts the production of unconventional gas reservoirs using rate-time models more accurately than assuming constant BHP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Covers the application of a wide range of topics, including reservoir characterization, geology and geophysics, core analysis, well logging, well testing, reservoir management, enhanced oil recovery, fluid mechanics, performance prediction, reservoir simulation, digital energy, uncertainty/risk assessment, information management, resource and reserve evaluation, portfolio/asset management, project valuation, and petroleum economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信