用听觉反馈范式研究发声产生与感知的相互作用

Shunsuke Tamura, Miduki Mori, Kazuhito Ito, Nobuyuki Hirose, S. Mori
{"title":"用听觉反馈范式研究发声产生与感知的相互作用","authors":"Shunsuke Tamura, Miduki Mori, Kazuhito Ito, Nobuyuki Hirose, S. Mori","doi":"10.1121/2.0000650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT boundary of /da/-/ta/, which may be due to selective adaptation. On the other hand, perturbed auditory feedback did not vary the boundary. One interpretation of these results is that the effects of voicing production modulation on voicing perception can be cancelled out by selective adaptation, which may have occurred by listening to a syllable sound /da/ during auditory feedback task.A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT bou...","PeriodicalId":20469,"journal":{"name":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on interactions between voicing production and perception using auditory feedback paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Shunsuke Tamura, Miduki Mori, Kazuhito Ito, Nobuyuki Hirose, S. Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/2.0000650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT boundary of /da/-/ta/, which may be due to selective adaptation. On the other hand, perturbed auditory feedback did not vary the boundary. One interpretation of these results is that the effects of voicing production modulation on voicing perception can be cancelled out by selective adaptation, which may have occurred by listening to a syllable sound /da/ during auditory feedback task.A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT bou...\",\"PeriodicalId\":20469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

先前的一项研究报告称,受干扰的听觉反馈会影响声音的产生[Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall(2014)]。j . Acoust。Soc。点。[j].生态学报,2016,29(5):2986-2994。在这项研究中,我们调查了听觉反馈是否也会影响声音感知。18名以日语为母语的人参加了这项实验。一半的参与者完成了一个听觉反馈任务,在这个任务中,一个音节的声音/da/与参与者发出的/ta/同时出现。另一组参与者做了一个被动听力任务,在这个任务中,参与者听到一个音节的声音/da/,但没有发音。在每个任务之前和之后,参与者分别执行/da/-/ta/语音生成任务和/da/-/ta/语音连续体变化的语音识别任务。结果表明,受干扰的听觉反馈延长了/ta/产生的VOT,而被动倾听对发声产生没有影响。在发声感知方面,被动倾听缩短了/da/-/ta/的VOT边界,这可能是选择性适应的结果。另一方面,受干扰的听觉反馈不改变边界。对这些结果的一种解释是,发声产生调制对发声感知的影响可以通过选择性适应来抵消,选择性适应可能是在听觉反馈任务中听音节音/da/时发生的。先前的一项研究报告称,受干扰的听觉反馈会影响声音的产生[Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall(2014)]。j . Acoust。Soc。点。[j].生态学报,2016,29(5):2986-2994。在这项研究中,我们调查了听觉反馈是否也会影响声音感知。18名以日语为母语的人参加了这项实验。一半的参与者完成了一个听觉反馈任务,在这个任务中,一个音节的声音/da/与参与者发出的/ta/同时出现。另一组参与者做了一个被动听力任务,在这个任务中,参与者听到一个音节的声音/da/,但没有发音。在每个任务之前和之后,参与者分别执行/da/-/ta/语音生成任务和/da/-/ta/语音连续体变化的语音识别任务。结果表明,受干扰的听觉反馈延长了/ta/产生的VOT,而被动倾听对发声产生没有影响。在发声感知方面,被动倾听缩短了VOT弓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on interactions between voicing production and perception using auditory feedback paradigm
A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT boundary of /da/-/ta/, which may be due to selective adaptation. On the other hand, perturbed auditory feedback did not vary the boundary. One interpretation of these results is that the effects of voicing production modulation on voicing perception can be cancelled out by selective adaptation, which may have occurred by listening to a syllable sound /da/ during auditory feedback task.A previous study reported that perturbed auditory feedback affected voicing production [Mitsuya, MacDonald, and Munhall (2014). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 135, 2986-2994]. In this study, we investigated whether perturbed auditory feedback would also affect voicing perception. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated in the experiment. Half of the participants performed an auditory feedback task in which a syllable sound /da/ was presented simultaneously with the participant’s utterance of /ta/. The other participants did a passive listening task in which participants heard a syllable sound /da/ without the utterance. Before and after each task, participants performed a /da/-/ta/ speech production task and a speech identification task of / da/-/ta/ continuum varying in voice-onset time (VOT). Results showed that perturbed auditory feedback lengthened the VOT of /ta/ production, whereas passive listening did not affect voicing production. Regarding voicing perception, passive listening shortened the VOT bou...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信