STAR:总结计时关联规则

Cristian Molinaro, Chiara Pulice, Anja Subasic, Abigail Bartolome, V. S. Subrahmanian
{"title":"STAR:总结计时关联规则","authors":"Cristian Molinaro, Chiara Pulice, Anja Subasic, Abigail Bartolome, V. S. Subrahmanian","doi":"10.1145/3419107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Timed association rules (TARs) generalize classical association rules (ARs) so that we can express temporal dependencies of the form “If X is true at time t , then Y will likely be true at time (t + τ ).” As with ARs, solving the TAR mining problem can generate huge numbers of rules. We show that methods to summarize ARs cannot work directly with TARs, and we develop two notions—strong and weak summaries—to summarize a set of TARs. We show that the problems of finding strong/weak summaries are NP-hard, and we provide polynomial-time approximation algorithms. We show experimentally that the coverage provided by our summarization methods is very high. Both technical measures based on coverage and human experiments on six World Bank datasets using 100 subjects from Mechanical Turk and a separate experiment with terrorism experts on a terrorism dataset show that while both summarization methods perform well, weak summaries are preferred, despite their taking more time to compute than strong summaries.","PeriodicalId":93404,"journal":{"name":"ACM/IMS transactions on data science","volume":"23 1","pages":"6:1-6:36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STAR: Summarizing Timed Association Rules\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Molinaro, Chiara Pulice, Anja Subasic, Abigail Bartolome, V. S. Subrahmanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3419107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Timed association rules (TARs) generalize classical association rules (ARs) so that we can express temporal dependencies of the form “If X is true at time t , then Y will likely be true at time (t + τ ).” As with ARs, solving the TAR mining problem can generate huge numbers of rules. We show that methods to summarize ARs cannot work directly with TARs, and we develop two notions—strong and weak summaries—to summarize a set of TARs. We show that the problems of finding strong/weak summaries are NP-hard, and we provide polynomial-time approximation algorithms. We show experimentally that the coverage provided by our summarization methods is very high. Both technical measures based on coverage and human experiments on six World Bank datasets using 100 subjects from Mechanical Turk and a separate experiment with terrorism experts on a terrorism dataset show that while both summarization methods perform well, weak summaries are preferred, despite their taking more time to compute than strong summaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM/IMS transactions on data science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"6:1-6:36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM/IMS transactions on data science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM/IMS transactions on data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

时间关联规则(TARs)概括了经典关联规则(ARs),因此我们可以用“如果X在时间t为真,那么Y在时间(t + τ)可能为真”的形式来表达时间依赖性。与ar一样,解决TAR挖掘问题可以生成大量规则。我们证明总结ar的方法不能直接与tar一起工作,并且我们提出了两个概念-强和弱摘要-来总结一组tar。我们证明了寻找强/弱摘要的问题是np困难的,并且我们提供了多项式时间近似算法。实验表明,我们的总结方法提供了很高的覆盖率。基于覆盖范围的技术测量和对六个世界银行数据集的人体实验,其中包括来自Mechanical Turk的100名受试者,以及与恐怖主义专家就恐怖主义数据集进行的单独实验表明,虽然两种总结方法都表现良好,但弱总结是首选,尽管它们比强总结需要更多的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STAR: Summarizing Timed Association Rules
Timed association rules (TARs) generalize classical association rules (ARs) so that we can express temporal dependencies of the form “If X is true at time t , then Y will likely be true at time (t + τ ).” As with ARs, solving the TAR mining problem can generate huge numbers of rules. We show that methods to summarize ARs cannot work directly with TARs, and we develop two notions—strong and weak summaries—to summarize a set of TARs. We show that the problems of finding strong/weak summaries are NP-hard, and we provide polynomial-time approximation algorithms. We show experimentally that the coverage provided by our summarization methods is very high. Both technical measures based on coverage and human experiments on six World Bank datasets using 100 subjects from Mechanical Turk and a separate experiment with terrorism experts on a terrorism dataset show that while both summarization methods perform well, weak summaries are preferred, despite their taking more time to compute than strong summaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信