新警务

P. Heymann
{"title":"新警务","authors":"P. Heymann","doi":"10.4135/9781446222270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores new forms of policing in New York, Chicago, and Boston. These cities developed new policing strategies that each involves a different combination of problem solving and new forms of “community policing”. The article explores whether these developments resulted in crime reduction and changes in belief in the efficacy of policing. The article concludes by considering the costs of the resulting increased security reduction in democratic control of policing and increased risk to civil liberties.","PeriodicalId":83028,"journal":{"name":"The Fordham urban law journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New Policing\",\"authors\":\"P. Heymann\",\"doi\":\"10.4135/9781446222270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores new forms of policing in New York, Chicago, and Boston. These cities developed new policing strategies that each involves a different combination of problem solving and new forms of “community policing”. The article explores whether these developments resulted in crime reduction and changes in belief in the efficacy of policing. The article concludes by considering the costs of the resulting increased security reduction in democratic control of policing and increased risk to civil liberties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"102\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fordham urban law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

摘要

本文探讨了纽约、芝加哥和波士顿的新警务形式。这些城市制定了新的警务策略,每个城市都涉及解决问题和新形式的“社区警务”的不同组合。这篇文章探讨了这些发展是否导致了犯罪的减少和人们对警务效力的看法的变化。文章最后考虑了由此带来的安全增加的成本,减少了对警察的民主控制,增加了对公民自由的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The New Policing
This article explores new forms of policing in New York, Chicago, and Boston. These cities developed new policing strategies that each involves a different combination of problem solving and new forms of “community policing”. The article explores whether these developments resulted in crime reduction and changes in belief in the efficacy of policing. The article concludes by considering the costs of the resulting increased security reduction in democratic control of policing and increased risk to civil liberties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信