结肠镜检查的质量指标

Halim Bou Daher, A. Sharara
{"title":"结肠镜检查的质量指标","authors":"Halim Bou Daher, A. Sharara","doi":"10.5812/ACR.84901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonoscopy is the preferred method for colorectal cancer screening. However, despite significant advances, the examination remains subject to limitations and variability amongst different practitioners. This calls for the need for objective quality indicators to ensure the optimal use of the modality. Three major priority quality measures have been identified that include adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. ADR is the best-studied metric correlating with outcomes including post-colonoscopy colon cancer, but has inherent limitations such as the potential for corruptibility. Other important quality indicators include the quality of bowel preparation and colonoscopy withdrawal time. All these quality measures are interrelated and an improvement in any of them would help in increasing the power of colonoscopy as a screening tool, as well as decreasing its economic burden and potentially improving adherence to screening guidelines.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Metrics and Indicators in Colonoscopy\",\"authors\":\"Halim Bou Daher, A. Sharara\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ACR.84901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colonoscopy is the preferred method for colorectal cancer screening. However, despite significant advances, the examination remains subject to limitations and variability amongst different practitioners. This calls for the need for objective quality indicators to ensure the optimal use of the modality. Three major priority quality measures have been identified that include adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. ADR is the best-studied metric correlating with outcomes including post-colonoscopy colon cancer, but has inherent limitations such as the potential for corruptibility. Other important quality indicators include the quality of bowel preparation and colonoscopy withdrawal time. All these quality measures are interrelated and an improvement in any of them would help in increasing the power of colonoscopy as a screening tool, as well as decreasing its economic burden and potentially improving adherence to screening guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Colorectal Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Colorectal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ACR.84901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ACR.84901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

结肠镜检查是结肠直肠癌筛查的首选方法。然而,尽管取得了重大进展,但该检查仍然受到不同从业人员的限制和差异。这就要求需要客观的质量指标,以确保最佳地利用这种方式。已经确定了三个主要的优先质量措施,包括腺瘤检出率(ADR)、盲肠插管和遵守监测指南。ADR是研究最充分的指标,与结肠镜检查后结肠癌相关,但有固有的局限性,如潜在的腐败性。其他重要的质量指标包括肠准备质量和结肠镜检查退出时间。所有这些质量指标都是相互关联的,其中任何一个指标的改善都将有助于提高结肠镜检查作为筛查工具的作用,减轻其经济负担,并有可能提高对筛查指南的遵守程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Metrics and Indicators in Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is the preferred method for colorectal cancer screening. However, despite significant advances, the examination remains subject to limitations and variability amongst different practitioners. This calls for the need for objective quality indicators to ensure the optimal use of the modality. Three major priority quality measures have been identified that include adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation, and adherence to surveillance guidelines. ADR is the best-studied metric correlating with outcomes including post-colonoscopy colon cancer, but has inherent limitations such as the potential for corruptibility. Other important quality indicators include the quality of bowel preparation and colonoscopy withdrawal time. All these quality measures are interrelated and an improvement in any of them would help in increasing the power of colonoscopy as a screening tool, as well as decreasing its economic burden and potentially improving adherence to screening guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信