男性腹主动脉瘤筛查的真实风险和益处

Lucinda Frank, Jonothan J. Earnshaw
{"title":"男性腹主动脉瘤筛查的真实风险和益处","authors":"Lucinda Frank,&nbsp;Jonothan J. Earnshaw","doi":"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for the premature death of more than 4000 men per year in England and Wales (Anjum et al., 2012 </span><span>[1]</span>). The condition is appropriate for screening, with, the aim to prevent premature death from AAA rupture. Screening is the investigation of people for an, otherwise unsuspected condition. Screening for many diseases is currently popular among the lay, press, on the basis that prevention of a serious condition is better than cure. Yet all screening is a, balance of potential harms and benefits. Making an informed choice about attending screening requires, that invited subjects receive balanced information about both the pros and cons. Information given to invited subjects usually contains key facts such as the significant benefits and major harms. The aim of this article is to examine some of the less obvious consequences of accepting or declining the offer of screening for AAA. There are also more subtle advantages and hazards that are less easily communicated, that may have consequences beyond the individual.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101091,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.10.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real risks and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men\",\"authors\":\"Lucinda Frank,&nbsp;Jonothan J. Earnshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for the premature death of more than 4000 men per year in England and Wales (Anjum et al., 2012 </span><span>[1]</span>). The condition is appropriate for screening, with, the aim to prevent premature death from AAA rupture. Screening is the investigation of people for an, otherwise unsuspected condition. Screening for many diseases is currently popular among the lay, press, on the basis that prevention of a serious condition is better than cure. Yet all screening is a, balance of potential harms and benefits. Making an informed choice about attending screening requires, that invited subjects receive balanced information about both the pros and cons. Information given to invited subjects usually contains key facts such as the significant benefits and major harms. The aim of this article is to examine some of the less obvious consequences of accepting or declining the offer of screening for AAA. There are also more subtle advantages and hazards that are less easily communicated, that may have consequences beyond the individual.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.10.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在英格兰和威尔士,每年有超过4000名男性因腹主动脉瘤破裂而过早死亡(Anjum et al., 2012[1])。这种情况适合进行筛查,目的是防止AAA破裂导致的过早死亡。筛查是对人们进行一项调查,否则就不会被怀疑。基于预防重于治疗这一原则,对许多疾病进行筛查目前在非专业新闻界很流行。然而,所有的筛查都是对潜在危害和益处的平衡。在知情的情况下做出是否参加筛查的选择,要求被邀请的受试者获得关于利弊的平衡信息。被邀请的受试者获得的信息通常包含关键事实,例如重大益处和重大危害。本文的目的是研究接受或拒绝接受AAA筛查的一些不太明显的后果。还有更微妙的好处和危害,这些好处和危害不太容易传达,可能会产生超出个人的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real risks and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is responsible for the premature death of more than 4000 men per year in England and Wales (Anjum et al., 2012 [1]). The condition is appropriate for screening, with, the aim to prevent premature death from AAA rupture. Screening is the investigation of people for an, otherwise unsuspected condition. Screening for many diseases is currently popular among the lay, press, on the basis that prevention of a serious condition is better than cure. Yet all screening is a, balance of potential harms and benefits. Making an informed choice about attending screening requires, that invited subjects receive balanced information about both the pros and cons. Information given to invited subjects usually contains key facts such as the significant benefits and major harms. The aim of this article is to examine some of the less obvious consequences of accepting or declining the offer of screening for AAA. There are also more subtle advantages and hazards that are less easily communicated, that may have consequences beyond the individual.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信