治安秩序:有效性和效率的评估

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Peter Hall
{"title":"治安秩序:有效性和效率的评估","authors":"Peter Hall","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1998.9964790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the police have been increasingly channelled towards measures of effectiveness and efficiency. Within society there exists widespread desires for the policing of a universal, unitary form of order. In the arena of public order policing, however, these desires are obstructed by the pluralism of values, beliefs and interests contained within that same society. Members of the public are attracted towards the protection of their own specific and concrete interests, although they nonetheless attempt to invoke a universal and generalisable order to which ‘others’ should conform. In reality such a generalisable form of order is not possible. The police, when they engage in the actual maintenance of order, respond to these contradictory demands by attempting to produce orderliness by invoking concrete and pragmatic solutions which are informed by the specific circumstances. The consequent reality is a ‘good enough’ level of order which is viewed as workable and sufficient for the majority of the p...","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"254 1","pages":"225-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policing order: Assessments of effectiveness and efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Peter Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1998.9964790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years the police have been increasingly channelled towards measures of effectiveness and efficiency. Within society there exists widespread desires for the policing of a universal, unitary form of order. In the arena of public order policing, however, these desires are obstructed by the pluralism of values, beliefs and interests contained within that same society. Members of the public are attracted towards the protection of their own specific and concrete interests, although they nonetheless attempt to invoke a universal and generalisable order to which ‘others’ should conform. In reality such a generalisable form of order is not possible. The police, when they engage in the actual maintenance of order, respond to these contradictory demands by attempting to produce orderliness by invoking concrete and pragmatic solutions which are informed by the specific circumstances. The consequent reality is a ‘good enough’ level of order which is viewed as workable and sufficient for the majority of the p...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":\"254 1\",\"pages\":\"225-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1998.9964790\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1998.9964790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来,警察越来越趋向于采取有效和效率的措施。在社会内部,存在着对一种普遍的、统一的秩序形式的监管的广泛愿望。然而,在维持公共秩序的领域,这些愿望受到同一社会中包含的价值、信仰和利益的多元化的阻碍。公众成员倾向于保护自己的特定和具体利益,尽管他们仍然试图援引一种“其他人”应该遵守的普遍和概括的秩序。在现实中,这样一种可推广的秩序形式是不可能的。警察在实际维持秩序时,对这些相互矛盾的要求作出反应,试图通过援引具体情况下的具体和务实的解决办法来产生秩序。随之而来的现实是一种“足够好”的秩序水平,这种秩序被认为是可行的,对大多数人来说是足够的……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policing order: Assessments of effectiveness and efficiency
In recent years the police have been increasingly channelled towards measures of effectiveness and efficiency. Within society there exists widespread desires for the policing of a universal, unitary form of order. In the arena of public order policing, however, these desires are obstructed by the pluralism of values, beliefs and interests contained within that same society. Members of the public are attracted towards the protection of their own specific and concrete interests, although they nonetheless attempt to invoke a universal and generalisable order to which ‘others’ should conform. In reality such a generalisable form of order is not possible. The police, when they engage in the actual maintenance of order, respond to these contradictory demands by attempting to produce orderliness by invoking concrete and pragmatic solutions which are informed by the specific circumstances. The consequent reality is a ‘good enough’ level of order which is viewed as workable and sufficient for the majority of the p...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信