可实现的可达性:利用高分辨率实时数据评估公共交通可达性的可靠性。

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Luyu Liu, Adam Porr, Harvey J Miller
{"title":"可实现的可达性:利用高分辨率实时数据评估公共交通可达性的可靠性。","authors":"Luyu Liu, Adam Porr, Harvey J Miller","doi":"10.1007/s10109-022-00382-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread availability of high spatial and temporal resolution public transit data is improving the measurement and analysis of public transit-based accessibility to crucial community resources such as jobs and health care. A common approach is leveraging transit route and schedule data published by transit agencies. However, this often results in accessibility overestimations due to endemic delays due to traffic and incidents in bus systems. Retrospective real-time accessibility measures calculated using real-time bus location data attempt to reduce overestimation by capturing the actual performance of the transit system. These measures also overestimate accessibility since they assume that riders had perfect information on systems operations as they occurred. In this paper, we introduce <i>realizable real-time accessibility</i> based on space-time prisms as a more conservative and realistic measure. We, moreover, define <i>accessibility unreliability</i> to measure overestimation of schedule-based and retrospective accessibility measures. Using high-resolution General Transit Feed Specification real-time data, we conduct a case study in the Central Ohio Transit Authority bus system in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Our results prove that realizable accessibility is the most conservative of the three accessibility measures. We also explore the spatial and temporal patterns in the unreliability of both traditional measures. These patterns are consistent with prior findings of the spatial and temporal patterns of bus delays and risk of missing transfers. Realizable accessibility is a more practical, conservative, and robust measure to guide transit planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geographical Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realizable accessibility: evaluating the reliability of public transit accessibility using high-resolution real-time data.\",\"authors\":\"Luyu Liu, Adam Porr, Harvey J Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10109-022-00382-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The widespread availability of high spatial and temporal resolution public transit data is improving the measurement and analysis of public transit-based accessibility to crucial community resources such as jobs and health care. A common approach is leveraging transit route and schedule data published by transit agencies. However, this often results in accessibility overestimations due to endemic delays due to traffic and incidents in bus systems. Retrospective real-time accessibility measures calculated using real-time bus location data attempt to reduce overestimation by capturing the actual performance of the transit system. These measures also overestimate accessibility since they assume that riders had perfect information on systems operations as they occurred. In this paper, we introduce <i>realizable real-time accessibility</i> based on space-time prisms as a more conservative and realistic measure. We, moreover, define <i>accessibility unreliability</i> to measure overestimation of schedule-based and retrospective accessibility measures. Using high-resolution General Transit Feed Specification real-time data, we conduct a case study in the Central Ohio Transit Authority bus system in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Our results prove that realizable accessibility is the most conservative of the three accessibility measures. We also explore the spatial and temporal patterns in the unreliability of both traditional measures. These patterns are consistent with prior findings of the spatial and temporal patterns of bus delays and risk of missing transfers. Realizable accessibility is a more practical, conservative, and robust measure to guide transit planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geographical Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9122481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geographical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-022-00382-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geographical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-022-00382-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高空间和时间分辨率公共交通数据的广泛提供,正在改善对基于公共交通的关键社区资源(如工作和医疗保健)可达性的测量和分析。一种常见的方法是利用公交机构发布的公交线路和时间表数据。然而,由于交通和公交系统事故造成的普遍延误,这往往会导致高估可达性。使用实时公交车位置数据计算的追溯性实时可达性测量,试图通过捕捉公交系统的实际表现来减少高估。这些测量方法也高估了可达性,因为它们假定乘客在系统运行时拥有完美的信息。在本文中,我们引入了基于时空棱镜的可实现实时可达性,作为一种更保守、更现实的衡量标准。此外,我们还定义了可达性不可靠度,以衡量对基于时间表和回顾性可达性测量的高估。利用高分辨率的通用公交反馈规范实时数据,我们在美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市的俄亥俄州中央交通局公交系统进行了案例研究。研究结果证明,可实现的可达性是三种可达性测量方法中最保守的一种。我们还探讨了两种传统测量方法不可靠的空间和时间模式。这些模式与之前对公交车延误的空间和时间模式以及错过换乘风险的研究结果是一致的。可实现的可达性是指导公交规划的更实用、更保守、更稳健的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Realizable accessibility: evaluating the reliability of public transit accessibility using high-resolution real-time data.

Realizable accessibility: evaluating the reliability of public transit accessibility using high-resolution real-time data.

The widespread availability of high spatial and temporal resolution public transit data is improving the measurement and analysis of public transit-based accessibility to crucial community resources such as jobs and health care. A common approach is leveraging transit route and schedule data published by transit agencies. However, this often results in accessibility overestimations due to endemic delays due to traffic and incidents in bus systems. Retrospective real-time accessibility measures calculated using real-time bus location data attempt to reduce overestimation by capturing the actual performance of the transit system. These measures also overestimate accessibility since they assume that riders had perfect information on systems operations as they occurred. In this paper, we introduce realizable real-time accessibility based on space-time prisms as a more conservative and realistic measure. We, moreover, define accessibility unreliability to measure overestimation of schedule-based and retrospective accessibility measures. Using high-resolution General Transit Feed Specification real-time data, we conduct a case study in the Central Ohio Transit Authority bus system in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Our results prove that realizable accessibility is the most conservative of the three accessibility measures. We also explore the spatial and temporal patterns in the unreliability of both traditional measures. These patterns are consistent with prior findings of the spatial and temporal patterns of bus delays and risk of missing transfers. Realizable accessibility is a more practical, conservative, and robust measure to guide transit planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geographical Systems (JGS) is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed academic journal that aims to encourage and promote high-quality scholarship on new theoretical or empirical results, models and methods in the social sciences. It solicits original papers with a spatial dimension that can be of interest to social scientists. Coverage includes regional science, economic geography, spatial economics, regional and urban economics, GIScience and GeoComputation, big data and machine learning. Spatial analysis, spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented. One of the distinctive features of the journal is its concern for the interface between modeling, statistical techniques and spatial issues in a wide spectrum of related fields. An important goal of the journal is to encourage a spatial perspective in the social sciences that emphasizes geographical space as a relevant dimension to our understanding of socio-economic phenomena. Contributions should be of high-quality, be technically well-crafted, make a substantial contribution to the subject and contain a spatial dimension. The journal also aims to publish, review and survey articles that make recent theoretical and methodological developments more readily accessible to the audience of the journal. All papers of this journal have undergone rigorous double-blind peer-review, based on initial editor screening and with at least two peer reviewers. Officially cited as J Geogr Syst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信