三层评分投票制度:一种新的投票制度的研究

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Hatem Smaoui, D. Lepelley
{"title":"三层评分投票制度:一种新的投票制度的研究","authors":"Hatem Smaoui, D. Lepelley","doi":"10.3917/REDP.236.0827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to explore the theoretical properties of the three-valued scale evaluative voting procedure. We confront this new election method, proposed by Felsenthal [1989] and Hillinger [2004a], with a set of normative criteria generally considered by voting theorists as “desirable” conditions that guarantee the consistency and the relevancy of the collective choice. For this purpose, we adapt these conditions, traditionally defined in the context of ordinal preferences, to a formal framework more compatible with the notion of evaluative voting. The normative results we obtain are supplemented by a probabilistic analysis allowing to evaluate the Condorcet efficiency of the evaluative voting procedure.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"2 1","pages":"827-850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le système de vote par note à trois niveaux : étude d'un nouveau mode de scrutin\",\"authors\":\"Hatem Smaoui, D. Lepelley\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/REDP.236.0827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this work is to explore the theoretical properties of the three-valued scale evaluative voting procedure. We confront this new election method, proposed by Felsenthal [1989] and Hillinger [2004a], with a set of normative criteria generally considered by voting theorists as “desirable” conditions that guarantee the consistency and the relevancy of the collective choice. For this purpose, we adapt these conditions, traditionally defined in the context of ordinal preferences, to a formal framework more compatible with the notion of evaluative voting. The normative results we obtain are supplemented by a probabilistic analysis allowing to evaluate the Condorcet efficiency of the evaluative voting procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"827-850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.236.0827\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.236.0827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨三值量表评价性投票程序的理论性质。我们面对Felsenthal[1989]和Hillinger [2004a]提出的这种新的选举方法,以及一套通常被投票理论家视为“理想”条件的规范标准,这些标准保证了集体选择的一致性和相关性。为此目的,我们将这些传统上在顺序偏好范围内定义的条件调整为更符合评价性投票概念的正式框架。我们得到的规范性结果是补充了一个概率分析,允许评估孔多塞效率的评价投票程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Le système de vote par note à trois niveaux : étude d'un nouveau mode de scrutin
The purpose of this work is to explore the theoretical properties of the three-valued scale evaluative voting procedure. We confront this new election method, proposed by Felsenthal [1989] and Hillinger [2004a], with a set of normative criteria generally considered by voting theorists as “desirable” conditions that guarantee the consistency and the relevancy of the collective choice. For this purpose, we adapt these conditions, traditionally defined in the context of ordinal preferences, to a formal framework more compatible with the notion of evaluative voting. The normative results we obtain are supplemented by a probabilistic analysis allowing to evaluate the Condorcet efficiency of the evaluative voting procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信