绿地环境下油田开发规划的整体工作流程研究

Mohamad Alkhatib, A. Ali, Muhammad Mukhtar, Sangseok Park, K. Ghorayeb, Amirhasan Nasiri, Abdur Rahman Shah, Aditya Ojha
{"title":"绿地环境下油田开发规划的整体工作流程研究","authors":"Mohamad Alkhatib, A. Ali, Muhammad Mukhtar, Sangseok Park, K. Ghorayeb, Amirhasan Nasiri, Abdur Rahman Shah, Aditya Ojha","doi":"10.2118/193140-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A novel workflow was developed to select the optimal field development plan (FDP) accounting for the associated uncertainties in a green onshore oil field with a limited number of wells and no production data. The FDP was then revisited in view of the performance of wells drilled during the execution phase and updated as needed based on the acquired data .\n Comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed resulting in multiple subsurface realizations. A broad set of development scenarios and options were screened under uncertainty. The viable scenarios were then economically evaluated, resulting in an optimal FDP that is robust to uncertainty and the least risk prone from an economical point of view.\n The used workflow was specifically suitable to test many development concepts and explore various options including horizontal well orientation, well pattern concept, pattern acreage and spacing, length of the horizontal sections, and landing of the horizontal sections.\n Following an extensive techno-economic analysis of all possible combinations (900 in total), the most robust development concept was selected and analyzed considering the viable development strategies pertaining to plateau rate, drilling schedule, phasing, water injection timing and artificial lift timings.\n A phased development approach was adopted enabling acquiring necessary data to mitigate the remaining uncertainty and avoid costly consequences of significant over- or under-capacity. Data acquired in one development phase were assessed and used to update the following planned phases, if necessary.\n The study demonstrated that the field development could accommodate a delay in either water injection or artificial lift implementation. Although it was not recommended at this stage to delay either of them, it is noteworthy that the long lead time that may be incurred in the implementation of artificial lift or the risk of lower injectivity would not impact the field performance or ultimate recovery if contained to a few years during initial production. These results further reinforced the robustness of the proposed development plan.\n Large subsurface uncertainty combined with an extensive set of possible development scenarios and options required cutting-edge uncertainty analysis and screening workflows to select the optimal FDP. These unique workflows can be readily used in similar green fields to help arrive at the final FDP.","PeriodicalId":11014,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Holistic Workflow for Field Development Planning in Green Field Environment: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Alkhatib, A. Ali, Muhammad Mukhtar, Sangseok Park, K. Ghorayeb, Amirhasan Nasiri, Abdur Rahman Shah, Aditya Ojha\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/193140-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A novel workflow was developed to select the optimal field development plan (FDP) accounting for the associated uncertainties in a green onshore oil field with a limited number of wells and no production data. The FDP was then revisited in view of the performance of wells drilled during the execution phase and updated as needed based on the acquired data .\\n Comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed resulting in multiple subsurface realizations. A broad set of development scenarios and options were screened under uncertainty. The viable scenarios were then economically evaluated, resulting in an optimal FDP that is robust to uncertainty and the least risk prone from an economical point of view.\\n The used workflow was specifically suitable to test many development concepts and explore various options including horizontal well orientation, well pattern concept, pattern acreage and spacing, length of the horizontal sections, and landing of the horizontal sections.\\n Following an extensive techno-economic analysis of all possible combinations (900 in total), the most robust development concept was selected and analyzed considering the viable development strategies pertaining to plateau rate, drilling schedule, phasing, water injection timing and artificial lift timings.\\n A phased development approach was adopted enabling acquiring necessary data to mitigate the remaining uncertainty and avoid costly consequences of significant over- or under-capacity. Data acquired in one development phase were assessed and used to update the following planned phases, if necessary.\\n The study demonstrated that the field development could accommodate a delay in either water injection or artificial lift implementation. Although it was not recommended at this stage to delay either of them, it is noteworthy that the long lead time that may be incurred in the implementation of artificial lift or the risk of lower injectivity would not impact the field performance or ultimate recovery if contained to a few years during initial production. These results further reinforced the robustness of the proposed development plan.\\n Large subsurface uncertainty combined with an extensive set of possible development scenarios and options required cutting-edge uncertainty analysis and screening workflows to select the optimal FDP. These unique workflows can be readily used in similar green fields to help arrive at the final FDP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/193140-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193140-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在一个油井数量有限且没有生产数据的绿色陆上油田中,考虑到相关的不确定性,提出了一种新的工作流程来选择最佳的油田开发计划(FDP)。然后,根据执行阶段所钻油井的性能,重新检查FDP,并根据所需数据进行更新。进行了全面的不确定性分析,得到了多个地下实现。在不确定的情况下,筛选了一系列广泛的发展方案和备选方案。然后对可行方案进行经济评估,得出最优的FDP,该FDP对不确定性具有鲁棒性,并且从经济角度来看风险最小。所使用的工作流程特别适合测试许多开发概念,并探索各种选择,包括水平井定向、井网概念、井网面积和间距、水平段长度以及水平段的着陆。在对所有可能的组合(总共900种)进行了广泛的技术经济分析之后,考虑到平台率、钻井进度、阶段、注水时机和人工举升时机等可行的开发策略,选择并分析了最稳健的开发概念。采用了一种分阶段发展的方法,能够获取必要的数据,以减轻剩余的不确定性,并避免能力严重过剩或不足造成的代价高昂的后果。评估在一个开发阶段获得的数据,并在必要时用于更新后续计划的阶段。研究表明,油田开发可以适应注水或人工举升实施的延迟。虽然现阶段不建议推迟这两种方法中的任何一种,但值得注意的是,在实施人工举升过程中可能产生的较长准备时间或较低注入能力的风险,如果在初始生产期间控制在几年内,则不会影响油田的性能或最终采收率。这些结果进一步加强了拟议发展计划的稳健性。巨大的地下不确定性,加上大量可能的开发方案和选择,需要先进的不确定性分析和筛选工作流程来选择最佳的FDP。这些独特的工作流程可以很容易地用于类似的绿色领域,以帮助达到最终的FDP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Holistic Workflow for Field Development Planning in Green Field Environment: A Case Study
A novel workflow was developed to select the optimal field development plan (FDP) accounting for the associated uncertainties in a green onshore oil field with a limited number of wells and no production data. The FDP was then revisited in view of the performance of wells drilled during the execution phase and updated as needed based on the acquired data . Comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed resulting in multiple subsurface realizations. A broad set of development scenarios and options were screened under uncertainty. The viable scenarios were then economically evaluated, resulting in an optimal FDP that is robust to uncertainty and the least risk prone from an economical point of view. The used workflow was specifically suitable to test many development concepts and explore various options including horizontal well orientation, well pattern concept, pattern acreage and spacing, length of the horizontal sections, and landing of the horizontal sections. Following an extensive techno-economic analysis of all possible combinations (900 in total), the most robust development concept was selected and analyzed considering the viable development strategies pertaining to plateau rate, drilling schedule, phasing, water injection timing and artificial lift timings. A phased development approach was adopted enabling acquiring necessary data to mitigate the remaining uncertainty and avoid costly consequences of significant over- or under-capacity. Data acquired in one development phase were assessed and used to update the following planned phases, if necessary. The study demonstrated that the field development could accommodate a delay in either water injection or artificial lift implementation. Although it was not recommended at this stage to delay either of them, it is noteworthy that the long lead time that may be incurred in the implementation of artificial lift or the risk of lower injectivity would not impact the field performance or ultimate recovery if contained to a few years during initial production. These results further reinforced the robustness of the proposed development plan. Large subsurface uncertainty combined with an extensive set of possible development scenarios and options required cutting-edge uncertainty analysis and screening workflows to select the optimal FDP. These unique workflows can be readily used in similar green fields to help arrive at the final FDP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信