SETH vs近似

A. Rubinstein, V. V. Williams
{"title":"SETH vs近似","authors":"A. Rubinstein, V. V. Williams","doi":"10.1145/3374857.3374870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our story is about hardness of problems in P, but its roots begin with two algorithmic approaches that have been developed to cope with NP-hard problems: approximation algorithms and fasterthan- brute-force algorithms.\n Approximation algorithms were proposed as a response for NP-hardness almost immediately (in historical perspective of almost half a century), and have been one of the most celebrated success stories of our eld. An outstanding complexity result in this area, which has since turned into a sub- eld of its own, is the Probabilistically Checkable Proof (PCP) Theorem. For many problems like Max-3-SAT we now have nearly tight hardness-of-approximation results.","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":"85 1","pages":"57-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SETH vs Approximation\",\"authors\":\"A. Rubinstein, V. V. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3374857.3374870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our story is about hardness of problems in P, but its roots begin with two algorithmic approaches that have been developed to cope with NP-hard problems: approximation algorithms and fasterthan- brute-force algorithms.\\n Approximation algorithms were proposed as a response for NP-hardness almost immediately (in historical perspective of almost half a century), and have been one of the most celebrated success stories of our eld. An outstanding complexity result in this area, which has since turned into a sub- eld of its own, is the Probabilistically Checkable Proof (PCP) Theorem. For many problems like Max-3-SAT we now have nearly tight hardness-of-approximation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGACT News\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"57-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGACT News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3374857.3374870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3374857.3374870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

我们的故事是关于P中问题的硬度,但它的根源始于两种算法方法,这两种方法是为了处理np困难问题而开发的:近似算法和比暴力算法更快的算法。近似算法几乎立即被提出作为对np -硬度的响应(从近半个世纪的历史角度来看),并且已经成为我们这个领域最著名的成功故事之一。在这一领域中,一个突出的复杂性结果是概率可检验证明定理(PCP),它已经形成了自己的一个子领域。对于像Max-3-SAT这样的许多问题,我们现在几乎有严格的近似硬度结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SETH vs Approximation
Our story is about hardness of problems in P, but its roots begin with two algorithmic approaches that have been developed to cope with NP-hard problems: approximation algorithms and fasterthan- brute-force algorithms. Approximation algorithms were proposed as a response for NP-hardness almost immediately (in historical perspective of almost half a century), and have been one of the most celebrated success stories of our eld. An outstanding complexity result in this area, which has since turned into a sub- eld of its own, is the Probabilistically Checkable Proof (PCP) Theorem. For many problems like Max-3-SAT we now have nearly tight hardness-of-approximation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信