特征设计通过等距嵌入:应用到翼型逆设计

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Qiuyi Chen, M. Fuge
{"title":"特征设计通过等距嵌入:应用到翼型逆设计","authors":"Qiuyi Chen, M. Fuge","doi":"10.1115/1.4063363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Many design problems involve reasoning about points in high-dimensional space. A common strategy is to first embed these high-dimensional points into a low-dimensional latent space. We propose that a good embedding should be isometric---i.e., preserving the geodesic distance between points on the data manifold in the latent space. However, enforcing isometry is non-trivial for common Neural embedding models such as autoencoders. Moreover, while theoretically appealing, it is unclear to what extent is enforcing isometry necessary for a given design analysis. This paper answers these questions by constructing an isometric embedding via an isometric autoencoder, which we employ to analyze an inverse airfoil design problem. Specifically, the paper describes how to train an isometric autoencoder and demonstrates its usefulness compared to non-isometric autoencoders on the UIUC airfoil dataset. Our ablation study illustrates that enforcing isometry is necessary for accurately discovering clusters through the latent space. We also show how isometric autoencoders can uncover pathologies in typical gradient-based Shape Optimization solvers through an analysis on the SU2-optimized airfoil dataset, wherein we find an over-reliance of the gradient solver on angle of attack. Overall, this paper motivates the use of isometry constraints in Neural embedding models, particularly in cases where researchers or designers intend to use distance-based analysis measures to analyze designs within the latent space. While this work focuses on airfoil design as an illustrative example, it applies to any domain where analyzing isometric design or data embeddings would be useful.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Designs via Isometric Embeddings: Applications to Airfoil Inverse Design\",\"authors\":\"Qiuyi Chen, M. Fuge\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Many design problems involve reasoning about points in high-dimensional space. A common strategy is to first embed these high-dimensional points into a low-dimensional latent space. We propose that a good embedding should be isometric---i.e., preserving the geodesic distance between points on the data manifold in the latent space. However, enforcing isometry is non-trivial for common Neural embedding models such as autoencoders. Moreover, while theoretically appealing, it is unclear to what extent is enforcing isometry necessary for a given design analysis. This paper answers these questions by constructing an isometric embedding via an isometric autoencoder, which we employ to analyze an inverse airfoil design problem. Specifically, the paper describes how to train an isometric autoencoder and demonstrates its usefulness compared to non-isometric autoencoders on the UIUC airfoil dataset. Our ablation study illustrates that enforcing isometry is necessary for accurately discovering clusters through the latent space. We also show how isometric autoencoders can uncover pathologies in typical gradient-based Shape Optimization solvers through an analysis on the SU2-optimized airfoil dataset, wherein we find an over-reliance of the gradient solver on angle of attack. Overall, this paper motivates the use of isometry constraints in Neural embedding models, particularly in cases where researchers or designers intend to use distance-based analysis measures to analyze designs within the latent space. While this work focuses on airfoil design as an illustrative example, it applies to any domain where analyzing isometric design or data embeddings would be useful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多设计问题涉及对高维空间中的点进行推理。一种常见的策略是首先将这些高维点嵌入到低维潜在空间中。我们建议一个好的嵌入应该是等距的——即。,在隐空间中保持数据流形上点之间的测地线距离。然而,对于常见的神经嵌入模型(如自编码器),强制等距是非常重要的。此外,虽然理论上很有吸引力,但对于给定的设计分析,在多大程度上强制执行等距是必要的还不清楚。本文通过等距自编码器构造等距嵌入来回答这些问题,我们采用等距自编码器来分析反翼型设计问题。具体来说,本文描述了如何训练一个等距自编码器,并证明了其实用性相比于非等距自编码器在UIUC翼型数据集。我们的消融研究表明,通过潜在空间精确地发现簇是必要的。我们还展示了等距自编码器如何通过对su2优化翼型数据集的分析揭示典型的基于梯度的形状优化求解器的病理,其中我们发现了对攻角的梯度求解器的过度依赖。总体而言,本文鼓励在神经嵌入模型中使用等距约束,特别是在研究人员或设计师打算使用基于距离的分析措施来分析潜在空间内的设计的情况下。而这项工作的重点是翼型设计作为一个说明性的例子,它适用于任何领域,其中分析等距设计或数据嵌入将是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing Designs via Isometric Embeddings: Applications to Airfoil Inverse Design
Many design problems involve reasoning about points in high-dimensional space. A common strategy is to first embed these high-dimensional points into a low-dimensional latent space. We propose that a good embedding should be isometric---i.e., preserving the geodesic distance between points on the data manifold in the latent space. However, enforcing isometry is non-trivial for common Neural embedding models such as autoencoders. Moreover, while theoretically appealing, it is unclear to what extent is enforcing isometry necessary for a given design analysis. This paper answers these questions by constructing an isometric embedding via an isometric autoencoder, which we employ to analyze an inverse airfoil design problem. Specifically, the paper describes how to train an isometric autoencoder and demonstrates its usefulness compared to non-isometric autoencoders on the UIUC airfoil dataset. Our ablation study illustrates that enforcing isometry is necessary for accurately discovering clusters through the latent space. We also show how isometric autoencoders can uncover pathologies in typical gradient-based Shape Optimization solvers through an analysis on the SU2-optimized airfoil dataset, wherein we find an over-reliance of the gradient solver on angle of attack. Overall, this paper motivates the use of isometry constraints in Neural embedding models, particularly in cases where researchers or designers intend to use distance-based analysis measures to analyze designs within the latent space. While this work focuses on airfoil design as an illustrative example, it applies to any domain where analyzing isometric design or data embeddings would be useful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信