临床与超声检查在新生儿髋关节筛查检测发育不良中的比较——以医院为基础的横断面研究

Viveksheel Kashyap, Rajeev Reddy Kikkuri, Dr. Anmol RS Mittal, Karri Sandeep Reddy, R. Singhal
{"title":"临床与超声检查在新生儿髋关节筛查检测发育不良中的比较——以医院为基础的横断面研究","authors":"Viveksheel Kashyap, Rajeev Reddy Kikkuri, Dr. Anmol RS Mittal, Karri Sandeep Reddy, R. Singhal","doi":"10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During infancy, among developmental abnormalities of the hip joint, a broad-spectrum anomaly is developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To examine this abnormality, no standardized screening protocol is available. Clinical examination is most frequently followed, and in doubtful cases, ultrasound (US) examination is used to confirm the diagnosis. Aims: The present study aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of clinical to US examination in neonatal hip screening to detect DDH. Materials and Methods: This is a 1-year hospital-based cross-sectional study. Newborns who were referred to the Department of Orthopaedics with suspected DDH and examined by both clinical examination and US examination were included in the study. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of the 75 babies, referred two-thirds were girls. The mean age of the babies was 6.25 ± 3.50 days. The breech presentation was the common risk factor (85.33%) for DDH, and LSCS was the standard mode of delivery. Clinical diagnosis of DDH was positive among babies, more on the left side than the right side. Eight babies (10.67%) were diagnosed to have DDH based on Graf’s test using USG. Among them, 4 (50%) babies had a clinical diagnosis of DDH. The sensitivity of the clinical trial with USG as reference standard was 50% Conclusion: Due to the lower sensitivity of clinical examination, USG screening should be done to detect DDH.","PeriodicalId":15476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"157 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Of Clinical and Ultrasound Examination in Neonatal Hip Screening for Detection of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip-Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Viveksheel Kashyap, Rajeev Reddy Kikkuri, Dr. Anmol RS Mittal, Karri Sandeep Reddy, R. Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: During infancy, among developmental abnormalities of the hip joint, a broad-spectrum anomaly is developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To examine this abnormality, no standardized screening protocol is available. Clinical examination is most frequently followed, and in doubtful cases, ultrasound (US) examination is used to confirm the diagnosis. Aims: The present study aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of clinical to US examination in neonatal hip screening to detect DDH. Materials and Methods: This is a 1-year hospital-based cross-sectional study. Newborns who were referred to the Department of Orthopaedics with suspected DDH and examined by both clinical examination and US examination were included in the study. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of the 75 babies, referred two-thirds were girls. The mean age of the babies was 6.25 ± 3.50 days. The breech presentation was the common risk factor (85.33%) for DDH, and LSCS was the standard mode of delivery. Clinical diagnosis of DDH was positive among babies, more on the left side than the right side. Eight babies (10.67%) were diagnosed to have DDH based on Graf’s test using USG. Among them, 4 (50%) babies had a clinical diagnosis of DDH. The sensitivity of the clinical trial with USG as reference standard was 50% Conclusion: Due to the lower sensitivity of clinical examination, USG screening should be done to detect DDH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在婴儿期,在髋关节发育异常中,一种广谱异常是髋关节发育不良(DDH)。为了检查这种异常,没有标准化的筛查方案。临床检查是最常见的,在可疑的情况下,超声检查被用来确认诊断。目的:本研究的目的是比较临床检查和超声检查在新生儿髋关节筛查中检测DDH的敏感性和特异性。材料和方法:这是一项为期一年的以医院为基础的横断面研究。转介至骨科疑似DDH并经临床检查和US检查的新生儿纳入研究。采用卡方检验和Fisher t检验进行统计分析。结果:在75名婴儿中,三分之二是女孩。婴儿平均年龄为6.25±3.50天。臀位是DDH的常见危险因素(85.33%),LSCS是标准分娩方式。婴儿DDH临床诊断呈阳性,左侧多于右侧。使用USG进行Graf试验诊断DDH 8例(10.67%)。其中4例(50%)患儿临床诊断为DDH。以USG为参比标准的临床试验灵敏度为50%。结论:由于临床检查的灵敏度较低,应进行USG筛查以检测DDH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Of Clinical and Ultrasound Examination in Neonatal Hip Screening for Detection of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip-Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Background: During infancy, among developmental abnormalities of the hip joint, a broad-spectrum anomaly is developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To examine this abnormality, no standardized screening protocol is available. Clinical examination is most frequently followed, and in doubtful cases, ultrasound (US) examination is used to confirm the diagnosis. Aims: The present study aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of clinical to US examination in neonatal hip screening to detect DDH. Materials and Methods: This is a 1-year hospital-based cross-sectional study. Newborns who were referred to the Department of Orthopaedics with suspected DDH and examined by both clinical examination and US examination were included in the study. The Chi-square test and Fisher’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of the 75 babies, referred two-thirds were girls. The mean age of the babies was 6.25 ± 3.50 days. The breech presentation was the common risk factor (85.33%) for DDH, and LSCS was the standard mode of delivery. Clinical diagnosis of DDH was positive among babies, more on the left side than the right side. Eight babies (10.67%) were diagnosed to have DDH based on Graf’s test using USG. Among them, 4 (50%) babies had a clinical diagnosis of DDH. The sensitivity of the clinical trial with USG as reference standard was 50% Conclusion: Due to the lower sensitivity of clinical examination, USG screening should be done to detect DDH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信