掌侧入路治疗桡骨远端骨折会影响方前肌吗?

M. Tunçez, H. Ursavaş, H. Tunçez, M. Tahta
{"title":"掌侧入路治疗桡骨远端骨折会影响方前肌吗?","authors":"M. Tunçez, H. Ursavaş, H. Tunçez, M. Tahta","doi":"10.5455/handmicrosurg.94388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: One of the structures encountered in surgical incision in volar Henry approach to distal end of the radius is the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle. It may be preferable to repair the PQ after the surgery on radius, but due to the structure of the muscle tissue, the success of repair and therefore repair indications are still controversial. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the PQ muscle placement and functional conclusions of patients with radial distal end fractures treated with volar locking plate. Methods:74 patients with closed distal radius fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with volar plate, are over 18 year were evaluated. Quick DASH, Stewart Scoring Board, AO classification, Frykman classification, thickness of the PQ muscle with USG, ranges of motion of wrist and grip strengths were recorded. Results:In 26 patients with PQ repair and 48 without PQ repair; no significant difference was found in QDASH scores (p=0.954), grip strength (p=0.300), ranges of motion of wrist and Stewart scores. No statistically significant thickness difference was found in USG transverse (p=0.312) and longitudinal (p=0.137) measurements made in patients with or without repair. Loss of thickness compared to the intact side was found as 15.4% in all patients. Conclusion:We found that PQ repair had no significant effect on range of motion of wrist, QDASH score or grip strength. We found an average 15.4% atrophy whether it was repaired or not. We believe that the portion of PQ removed from the radius does not affect the function of hand.","PeriodicalId":31023,"journal":{"name":"Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"112 1","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Pronator Quadratus Affected In Volar Approach To Distal Radius Fractures?\",\"authors\":\"M. Tunçez, H. Ursavaş, H. Tunçez, M. Tahta\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/handmicrosurg.94388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: One of the structures encountered in surgical incision in volar Henry approach to distal end of the radius is the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle. It may be preferable to repair the PQ after the surgery on radius, but due to the structure of the muscle tissue, the success of repair and therefore repair indications are still controversial. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the PQ muscle placement and functional conclusions of patients with radial distal end fractures treated with volar locking plate. Methods:74 patients with closed distal radius fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with volar plate, are over 18 year were evaluated. Quick DASH, Stewart Scoring Board, AO classification, Frykman classification, thickness of the PQ muscle with USG, ranges of motion of wrist and grip strengths were recorded. Results:In 26 patients with PQ repair and 48 without PQ repair; no significant difference was found in QDASH scores (p=0.954), grip strength (p=0.300), ranges of motion of wrist and Stewart scores. No statistically significant thickness difference was found in USG transverse (p=0.312) and longitudinal (p=0.137) measurements made in patients with or without repair. Loss of thickness compared to the intact side was found as 15.4% in all patients. Conclusion:We found that PQ repair had no significant effect on range of motion of wrist, QDASH score or grip strength. We found an average 15.4% atrophy whether it was repaired or not. We believe that the portion of PQ removed from the radius does not affect the function of hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"86-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/handmicrosurg.94388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/handmicrosurg.94388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:掌侧亨利入路到桡骨远端手术切口时遇到的结构之一是旋前方肌。桡骨手术后修复PQ可能更好,但由于肌肉组织的结构,修复的成功和修复的适应症仍然存在争议。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估掌侧锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折患者的PQ肌位置和功能结论。方法:对74例18岁以上桡骨远端闭合性骨折行掌侧钢板内固定的患者进行回顾性分析。记录快速DASH、Stewart计分板、AO分级、Frykman分级、带USG的PQ肌厚度、腕关节活动度和握力。结果:PQ修复26例,未修复48例;QDASH评分(p=0.954)、握力(p=0.300)、腕关节活动度、Stewart评分差异无统计学意义。在修复或未修复的患者中,USG横向(p=0.312)和纵向(p=0.137)测量的厚度无统计学意义差异。与完整侧相比,所有患者的厚度损失为15.4%。结论:PQ修复对腕关节活动度、QDASH评分及握力无显著影响。无论修复与否,平均萎缩率为15.4%。我们认为PQ从桡骨上切除的部分不会影响手的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Pronator Quadratus Affected In Volar Approach To Distal Radius Fractures?
Objective: One of the structures encountered in surgical incision in volar Henry approach to distal end of the radius is the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle. It may be preferable to repair the PQ after the surgery on radius, but due to the structure of the muscle tissue, the success of repair and therefore repair indications are still controversial. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the PQ muscle placement and functional conclusions of patients with radial distal end fractures treated with volar locking plate. Methods:74 patients with closed distal radius fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with volar plate, are over 18 year were evaluated. Quick DASH, Stewart Scoring Board, AO classification, Frykman classification, thickness of the PQ muscle with USG, ranges of motion of wrist and grip strengths were recorded. Results:In 26 patients with PQ repair and 48 without PQ repair; no significant difference was found in QDASH scores (p=0.954), grip strength (p=0.300), ranges of motion of wrist and Stewart scores. No statistically significant thickness difference was found in USG transverse (p=0.312) and longitudinal (p=0.137) measurements made in patients with or without repair. Loss of thickness compared to the intact side was found as 15.4% in all patients. Conclusion:We found that PQ repair had no significant effect on range of motion of wrist, QDASH score or grip strength. We found an average 15.4% atrophy whether it was repaired or not. We believe that the portion of PQ removed from the radius does not affect the function of hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信