意大利和必要的公共投资刺激:需求和供给侧

P. Scandizzo, G. Tria
{"title":"意大利和必要的公共投资刺激:需求和供给侧","authors":"P. Scandizzo, G. Tria","doi":"10.4172/2375-4389.1000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The controversial nature of public investment as a countercyclical demand stimulus has contributed to obscure the issue of its long term fall, with many governments feeling justified in making deeper cuts for public investment expenditure during both phases of the economic cycle, and many others favoring public-private partnerships and other forms of blended financing. In addition to the overall fall, an asset substitution process has progressively reduced the truly social part of public investment, which in developing and developed countries alike may be well below the mark of 1-2% of GDP. This negative trend is made more dramatic by the fact that virtually the only public investment with a reach beyond the single countries is of public- private nature and thus explicitly excludes multilateral assets of pure public good nature, such as intercountry infrastructure and multilateral social welfare programs. The situation is especially dramatic for Italy, where the fall of public investment has contributed to the decline of key components of the country human and social capital endowment. This article explores some of the most important dimensions of this phenomenon, concentrating on the supply rather than the demand side effects, and proposes a solution based on a conditioned expansion of European public investment, concentrated in highly productive assets such as education and infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":73758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health economics and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Italy and a Needed Public Investment Boost: The Demand and the Supply Side\",\"authors\":\"P. Scandizzo, G. Tria\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2375-4389.1000310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The controversial nature of public investment as a countercyclical demand stimulus has contributed to obscure the issue of its long term fall, with many governments feeling justified in making deeper cuts for public investment expenditure during both phases of the economic cycle, and many others favoring public-private partnerships and other forms of blended financing. In addition to the overall fall, an asset substitution process has progressively reduced the truly social part of public investment, which in developing and developed countries alike may be well below the mark of 1-2% of GDP. This negative trend is made more dramatic by the fact that virtually the only public investment with a reach beyond the single countries is of public- private nature and thus explicitly excludes multilateral assets of pure public good nature, such as intercountry infrastructure and multilateral social welfare programs. The situation is especially dramatic for Italy, where the fall of public investment has contributed to the decline of key components of the country human and social capital endowment. This article explores some of the most important dimensions of this phenomenon, concentrating on the supply rather than the demand side effects, and proposes a solution based on a conditioned expansion of European public investment, concentrated in highly productive assets such as education and infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global health economics and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health economics and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4389.1000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共投资作为一种反周期需求刺激的有争议的性质,使其长期下降的问题变得模糊,许多政府认为在经济周期的两个阶段都有理由进一步削减公共投资支出,而其他许多政府则倾向于公私合作伙伴关系和其他形式的混合融资。除了整体下降之外,资产替代过程还逐渐减少了公共投资中真正的社会部分,这在发展中国家和发达国家都可能远远低于GDP的1-2%。这种负面趋势由于以下事实而变得更加戏剧化:实际上,唯一能超越单一国家的公共投资是公私合营性质的,因此明确排除了纯公共产品性质的多边资产,如跨国基础设施和多边社会福利计划。意大利的情况尤其严重,公共投资的下降导致该国人力和社会资本禀赋的关键组成部分下降。本文探讨了这一现象的一些最重要的方面,集中在供应而不是需求的副作用上,并提出了一个基于欧洲公共投资的有条件扩张的解决方案,集中在教育和基础设施等高生产率资产上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Italy and a Needed Public Investment Boost: The Demand and the Supply Side
The controversial nature of public investment as a countercyclical demand stimulus has contributed to obscure the issue of its long term fall, with many governments feeling justified in making deeper cuts for public investment expenditure during both phases of the economic cycle, and many others favoring public-private partnerships and other forms of blended financing. In addition to the overall fall, an asset substitution process has progressively reduced the truly social part of public investment, which in developing and developed countries alike may be well below the mark of 1-2% of GDP. This negative trend is made more dramatic by the fact that virtually the only public investment with a reach beyond the single countries is of public- private nature and thus explicitly excludes multilateral assets of pure public good nature, such as intercountry infrastructure and multilateral social welfare programs. The situation is especially dramatic for Italy, where the fall of public investment has contributed to the decline of key components of the country human and social capital endowment. This article explores some of the most important dimensions of this phenomenon, concentrating on the supply rather than the demand side effects, and proposes a solution based on a conditioned expansion of European public investment, concentrated in highly productive assets such as education and infrastructure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信