银行绩效分析及电子银行客户满意度关键决定因素识别-平衡计分卡方法

IF 0.2 N/A ART
Nevena Jolović, Ivana Jolović, S. Zdravković
{"title":"银行绩效分析及电子银行客户满意度关键决定因素识别-平衡计分卡方法","authors":"Nevena Jolović, Ivana Jolović, S. Zdravković","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2283459j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of adequate measurement of the use of intangible assets and monitoring its impact on the financial performance of the organization in recent decades is bridged by a measurement-managerial model that unites financial and non-financial performance indicators - Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Since this paper focuses on banks as representatives of specific, modern financial organizations, the subject of research is to examine the possibility of applying this model in the analysis of banking performance. The aim of the research is to analyze, by using the qualitative methodology (review of existing papers in the literature), whether the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances; and then, by using the quantitative methodology, through connecting two perspectives of the same model (perspective of internal business processes and perspective of customers), to examine how the determinants of TAM model (perceived usefulness, ease of use) and determinants of SERVQUAL model (perceived security and privacy, responsibility) affect electronic banking customer satisfaction. The empirical research was conducted through the survey method on the territory of the Republic of Serbia at the end of 2020, and the sample included 324 respondents. Statistical software SPSS Statistics was used to process the collected data. Based on the literature review, it was found that the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances. The results of the empirical research have shown that perceived usefulness, perceived security and privacy, and responsibility have a positive statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of electronic banking users, while ease of use does not have a statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of mentioned users.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bank performance analysis and identification of key determinants of electronic banking customer satisfaction - balanced scorecard approach\",\"authors\":\"Nevena Jolović, Ivana Jolović, S. Zdravković\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zmsdn2283459j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of adequate measurement of the use of intangible assets and monitoring its impact on the financial performance of the organization in recent decades is bridged by a measurement-managerial model that unites financial and non-financial performance indicators - Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Since this paper focuses on banks as representatives of specific, modern financial organizations, the subject of research is to examine the possibility of applying this model in the analysis of banking performance. The aim of the research is to analyze, by using the qualitative methodology (review of existing papers in the literature), whether the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances; and then, by using the quantitative methodology, through connecting two perspectives of the same model (perspective of internal business processes and perspective of customers), to examine how the determinants of TAM model (perceived usefulness, ease of use) and determinants of SERVQUAL model (perceived security and privacy, responsibility) affect electronic banking customer satisfaction. The empirical research was conducted through the survey method on the territory of the Republic of Serbia at the end of 2020, and the sample included 324 respondents. Statistical software SPSS Statistics was used to process the collected data. Based on the literature review, it was found that the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances. The results of the empirical research have shown that perceived usefulness, perceived security and privacy, and responsibility have a positive statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of electronic banking users, while ease of use does not have a statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of mentioned users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2283459j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2283459j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,对无形资产的使用进行充分计量并监测其对组织财务绩效的影响的问题,通过统一财务和非财务绩效指标的计量管理模型-平衡计分卡(BSC)来解决。由于本文关注的是作为特定现代金融组织代表的银行,因此研究的主题是检验将该模型应用于银行绩效分析的可能性。本研究的目的是通过使用定性方法(回顾文献中已有的论文)来分析平衡记分卡模型是否适用于银行绩效分析;然后,运用定量方法,通过连接同一模型的两个视角(内部业务流程视角和客户视角),考察TAM模型的决定因素(感知有用性、易用性)和SERVQUAL模型的决定因素(感知安全性、隐私性、责任)如何影响电子银行客户满意度。实证研究采用调查法,于2020年底在塞尔维亚共和国境内进行,样本包括324名受访者。采用SPSS统计软件对收集的数据进行处理。通过文献综述,我们发现平衡记分卡模型适用于银行绩效分析。实证研究结果表明,感知有用性、感知安全与隐私性、感知责任对电子银行用户满意度有统计学显著的正向影响,而易用性对上述用户满意度无统计学显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bank performance analysis and identification of key determinants of electronic banking customer satisfaction - balanced scorecard approach
The issue of adequate measurement of the use of intangible assets and monitoring its impact on the financial performance of the organization in recent decades is bridged by a measurement-managerial model that unites financial and non-financial performance indicators - Balanced Scorecard (BSC). Since this paper focuses on banks as representatives of specific, modern financial organizations, the subject of research is to examine the possibility of applying this model in the analysis of banking performance. The aim of the research is to analyze, by using the qualitative methodology (review of existing papers in the literature), whether the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances; and then, by using the quantitative methodology, through connecting two perspectives of the same model (perspective of internal business processes and perspective of customers), to examine how the determinants of TAM model (perceived usefulness, ease of use) and determinants of SERVQUAL model (perceived security and privacy, responsibility) affect electronic banking customer satisfaction. The empirical research was conducted through the survey method on the territory of the Republic of Serbia at the end of 2020, and the sample included 324 respondents. Statistical software SPSS Statistics was used to process the collected data. Based on the literature review, it was found that the BSC model is applicable for the analysis of banking performances. The results of the empirical research have shown that perceived usefulness, perceived security and privacy, and responsibility have a positive statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of electronic banking users, while ease of use does not have a statistically significant impact on the satisfaction of mentioned users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信